Social exclusion modulates fairness consideration in the ultimatum game: an ERP study

Previous neuroimaging research has identified brain regions activated when people’s fairness consideration changes under conditions of social exclusion. The current study used EEG data to examine the temporal process of changes in fairness consideration under social exclusion. In this study, a Cyber...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen eQu, Yuru eWang, Yunyun eHuang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00505/full
id doaj-0bb4638e0e614a6b858ee1b7301b908b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0bb4638e0e614a6b858ee1b7301b908b2020-11-25T02:04:19ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612013-08-01710.3389/fnhum.2013.0050561754Social exclusion modulates fairness consideration in the ultimatum game: an ERP studyChen eQu0Yuru eWang1Yunyun eHuang2South China Normal UniversitySouth China Normal UniversitySouth China Normal UniversityPrevious neuroimaging research has identified brain regions activated when people’s fairness consideration changes under conditions of social exclusion. The current study used EEG data to examine the temporal process of changes in fairness consideration under social exclusion. In this study, a Cyberball game was administered to manipulate participants’ social exclusion or inclusion. Then, in the following Ultimatum game, participants’ brain potentials were recorded while they received fair/unfair offers from someone who previously excluded them, someone who previously included them, or a stranger. Results showed that feedback related negativity (FRN) after onset of distribution outcome was more pronounced for unfair offers compared to fair offers. Moreover, the FRN was more negative-going in response to unfair offers from people who previously excluded them than from the includer and the stranger. Fair offers ¬¬¬elicited a larger P300 than unfair offers. In addition, P300 was more positive-going for unfair offers from the stranger than from the excluder and the includer. This study reveals a temporal process in which the effects of social exclusion on fair consideration are reflected in FRN in the early stage of outcome evaluation. These data also suggest that the FRN is modulated by the subjective evaluation of outcome events in a social context.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00505/fullsocial exclusionevent-related potential (ERP)fairness considerationoutcome evaluationfeedback related negativity (FRN)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chen eQu
Yuru eWang
Yunyun eHuang
spellingShingle Chen eQu
Yuru eWang
Yunyun eHuang
Social exclusion modulates fairness consideration in the ultimatum game: an ERP study
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
social exclusion
event-related potential (ERP)
fairness consideration
outcome evaluation
feedback related negativity (FRN)
author_facet Chen eQu
Yuru eWang
Yunyun eHuang
author_sort Chen eQu
title Social exclusion modulates fairness consideration in the ultimatum game: an ERP study
title_short Social exclusion modulates fairness consideration in the ultimatum game: an ERP study
title_full Social exclusion modulates fairness consideration in the ultimatum game: an ERP study
title_fullStr Social exclusion modulates fairness consideration in the ultimatum game: an ERP study
title_full_unstemmed Social exclusion modulates fairness consideration in the ultimatum game: an ERP study
title_sort social exclusion modulates fairness consideration in the ultimatum game: an erp study
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
issn 1662-5161
publishDate 2013-08-01
description Previous neuroimaging research has identified brain regions activated when people’s fairness consideration changes under conditions of social exclusion. The current study used EEG data to examine the temporal process of changes in fairness consideration under social exclusion. In this study, a Cyberball game was administered to manipulate participants’ social exclusion or inclusion. Then, in the following Ultimatum game, participants’ brain potentials were recorded while they received fair/unfair offers from someone who previously excluded them, someone who previously included them, or a stranger. Results showed that feedback related negativity (FRN) after onset of distribution outcome was more pronounced for unfair offers compared to fair offers. Moreover, the FRN was more negative-going in response to unfair offers from people who previously excluded them than from the includer and the stranger. Fair offers ¬¬¬elicited a larger P300 than unfair offers. In addition, P300 was more positive-going for unfair offers from the stranger than from the excluder and the includer. This study reveals a temporal process in which the effects of social exclusion on fair consideration are reflected in FRN in the early stage of outcome evaluation. These data also suggest that the FRN is modulated by the subjective evaluation of outcome events in a social context.
topic social exclusion
event-related potential (ERP)
fairness consideration
outcome evaluation
feedback related negativity (FRN)
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00505/full
work_keys_str_mv AT chenequ socialexclusionmodulatesfairnessconsiderationintheultimatumgameanerpstudy
AT yuruewang socialexclusionmodulatesfairnessconsiderationintheultimatumgameanerpstudy
AT yunyunehuang socialexclusionmodulatesfairnessconsiderationintheultimatumgameanerpstudy
_version_ 1724943161081462784