Why the Covenant Worked: On the Institutional Foundations of the American Civil Religion

Scholars of American civil religion (ACR) have paid insufficient attention to the micro-level processes through which civil religious ideas have historically influenced beliefs and behavior. We know little about what makes such appeals meaningful to average Americans (assuming they are meaningful);...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John W. Compton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-05-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/6/350
id doaj-0ba4ae4dd1d1447b973cd76c521992fb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0ba4ae4dd1d1447b973cd76c521992fb2020-11-25T01:58:52ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442019-05-0110635010.3390/rel10060350rel10060350Why the Covenant Worked: On the Institutional Foundations of the American Civil ReligionJohn W. Compton0Department of Political Science, Chapman University, Orange, CA 92866, USAScholars of American civil religion (ACR) have paid insufficient attention to the micro-level processes through which civil religious ideas have historically influenced beliefs and behavior. We know little about what makes such appeals meaningful to average Americans (assuming they are meaningful); nor do we know much about the mechanisms through which abstract religious themes and imagery come to be associated with specific policy aims, or what Robert Bellah called “national goals.” This article argues that a renewed focus on the relationship between civil religion and organized religion can help fill this gap in the literature. More specifically, I draw attention to three mainline Protestant institutions that for much of the twentieth-century were instrumental both in cultivating respect for the national civic faith and in connecting its abstract ideals to concrete reform programs: namely, the clergy, the state and local church councils, and the policy-oriented departments of the National Council of Churches (NCC). Finally, I argue that a fresh look at the relationship between civil religion and “church religion” sheds new light on the (arguably) diminished role of civil religious appeals in the present. If, as Bellah claimed in his later writings, ACR appeals have lost much of their power to motivate support for shared national goals, it is at least in part because the formal religious networks through which they once were transmitted and interpreted have largely collapsed.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/6/350civil religionRobert Bellahmainline Protestantismcivil rights
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John W. Compton
spellingShingle John W. Compton
Why the Covenant Worked: On the Institutional Foundations of the American Civil Religion
Religions
civil religion
Robert Bellah
mainline Protestantism
civil rights
author_facet John W. Compton
author_sort John W. Compton
title Why the Covenant Worked: On the Institutional Foundations of the American Civil Religion
title_short Why the Covenant Worked: On the Institutional Foundations of the American Civil Religion
title_full Why the Covenant Worked: On the Institutional Foundations of the American Civil Religion
title_fullStr Why the Covenant Worked: On the Institutional Foundations of the American Civil Religion
title_full_unstemmed Why the Covenant Worked: On the Institutional Foundations of the American Civil Religion
title_sort why the covenant worked: on the institutional foundations of the american civil religion
publisher MDPI AG
series Religions
issn 2077-1444
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Scholars of American civil religion (ACR) have paid insufficient attention to the micro-level processes through which civil religious ideas have historically influenced beliefs and behavior. We know little about what makes such appeals meaningful to average Americans (assuming they are meaningful); nor do we know much about the mechanisms through which abstract religious themes and imagery come to be associated with specific policy aims, or what Robert Bellah called “national goals.” This article argues that a renewed focus on the relationship between civil religion and organized religion can help fill this gap in the literature. More specifically, I draw attention to three mainline Protestant institutions that for much of the twentieth-century were instrumental both in cultivating respect for the national civic faith and in connecting its abstract ideals to concrete reform programs: namely, the clergy, the state and local church councils, and the policy-oriented departments of the National Council of Churches (NCC). Finally, I argue that a fresh look at the relationship between civil religion and “church religion” sheds new light on the (arguably) diminished role of civil religious appeals in the present. If, as Bellah claimed in his later writings, ACR appeals have lost much of their power to motivate support for shared national goals, it is at least in part because the formal religious networks through which they once were transmitted and interpreted have largely collapsed.
topic civil religion
Robert Bellah
mainline Protestantism
civil rights
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/10/6/350
work_keys_str_mv AT johnwcompton whythecovenantworkedontheinstitutionalfoundationsoftheamericancivilreligion
_version_ 1724967535803105280