Studying Politics or Being Political? High School Students’ Assessment of the Welfare State

Purpose: This article examines high school students’ understanding of the welfare state as a political issue and discusses how it can be approached in the classroom. The study was conducted within a social-science educational context and departs from a perspective from which educational goals can b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Johan Sandahl
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Bielefeld University 2019-03-01
Series:Journal of Social Science Education
Online Access:http://www.jsse.org/index.php/jsse/article/view/900
id doaj-0b9ead5fe6d644b192c7aa00c12dc362
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0b9ead5fe6d644b192c7aa00c12dc3622020-11-24T21:28:51ZdeuBielefeld UniversityJournal of Social Science Education1618-52932019-03-0118110.4119/jsse-900Studying Politics or Being Political? High School Students’ Assessment of the Welfare StateJohan Sandahl0Stockholm University, Department of Humanities and Social Science Education Purpose: This article examines high school students’ understanding of the welfare state as a political issue and discusses how it can be approached in the classroom. The study was conducted within a social-science educational context and departs from a perspective from which educational goals can be seen as intrinsic (goals closely connected to the academic disciplines) or extrinsic (goals formulated by the political sphere, e.g. students’ deliberation on political issues). These variant goals can pose a dilemma for teachers and students alike as they engage in highly political topics. Design & methodology: To explain the structure of the dilemmas of teaching issues that can be understood politically in a social-science context, this paper focuses on students’ assessment of such topics before teaching and how they generally reason different political views on the welfare state. The data consist of written documents produced by tenth-year students in response to two accounts of the best welfare state. Using a qualitative content analysis, the data were analysed to identify students’ approaches to a political issue and their normative reasoning. Findings: The results display an understanding of the welfare state that is consistent with extrinsic goals, i.e. as an issue to engage with as a political entity rather than exclusively as a social scientist. It was noted that students experience difficulty in recognising the difference between politics and the study of politics. Practical implications: The study contributes to an understanding of the influence of normativity on students’ thinking and represents an attempt to bridge the difficulty of combining intrinsic and extrinsic goals in social-science education. http://www.jsse.org/index.php/jsse/article/view/900
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Johan Sandahl
spellingShingle Johan Sandahl
Studying Politics or Being Political? High School Students’ Assessment of the Welfare State
Journal of Social Science Education
author_facet Johan Sandahl
author_sort Johan Sandahl
title Studying Politics or Being Political? High School Students’ Assessment of the Welfare State
title_short Studying Politics or Being Political? High School Students’ Assessment of the Welfare State
title_full Studying Politics or Being Political? High School Students’ Assessment of the Welfare State
title_fullStr Studying Politics or Being Political? High School Students’ Assessment of the Welfare State
title_full_unstemmed Studying Politics or Being Political? High School Students’ Assessment of the Welfare State
title_sort studying politics or being political? high school students’ assessment of the welfare state
publisher Bielefeld University
series Journal of Social Science Education
issn 1618-5293
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Purpose: This article examines high school students’ understanding of the welfare state as a political issue and discusses how it can be approached in the classroom. The study was conducted within a social-science educational context and departs from a perspective from which educational goals can be seen as intrinsic (goals closely connected to the academic disciplines) or extrinsic (goals formulated by the political sphere, e.g. students’ deliberation on political issues). These variant goals can pose a dilemma for teachers and students alike as they engage in highly political topics. Design & methodology: To explain the structure of the dilemmas of teaching issues that can be understood politically in a social-science context, this paper focuses on students’ assessment of such topics before teaching and how they generally reason different political views on the welfare state. The data consist of written documents produced by tenth-year students in response to two accounts of the best welfare state. Using a qualitative content analysis, the data were analysed to identify students’ approaches to a political issue and their normative reasoning. Findings: The results display an understanding of the welfare state that is consistent with extrinsic goals, i.e. as an issue to engage with as a political entity rather than exclusively as a social scientist. It was noted that students experience difficulty in recognising the difference between politics and the study of politics. Practical implications: The study contributes to an understanding of the influence of normativity on students’ thinking and represents an attempt to bridge the difficulty of combining intrinsic and extrinsic goals in social-science education.
url http://www.jsse.org/index.php/jsse/article/view/900
work_keys_str_mv AT johansandahl studyingpoliticsorbeingpoliticalhighschoolstudentsassessmentofthewelfarestate
_version_ 1725969012097024000