#BLACKLIVESMATTER and struggle over national discourse on Twitter: digital activism as new public sphere

• Main Authors: Valeria Bondarenko, Olena Kaptiurova, Vira Orlova
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv 2021-05-01
• Series: Актуальні проблеми української лінгвістики: теорія і практика
• Online Access: https://apultp.knu.ua/index.php/APULTP/article/view/100

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/APULTP.2021.42.90-103 The tragic death of George Floyd, an African-American male killed by a white policeman, has been widely discussed on social media and instigated many to use social media as an argumentum over the law enforcement role and the racist status quo in the USA. As social media have unignorably become a tool for activists who seek to introduce new voices into the present-day monoglossic public opinion, Twitter has offered the space for the Black Lives Matter digital activism to create their own identity that enables them to participate in (re)shaping the public opinion and aspire for social change. Social media, leaning on the technological thrust into modern society, have created a viable substitute for public sphere to challenge the power and hegemony which control the production of discourse and agenda that dominate the public opinion. The study draws on Habermas' theory of the 'public sphere' so as to conceptualize the #BalckLivesMatter (BLM) activism aimed at controlling the public national discourse. Critical Discourse Analysis, in its turn, provides the framework for critical examination of language choices and the ways in which texts are structured, selected, and invested with meanings that facilitate the promotion of certain ideologies and particular social representations. Using this theoretical background, the article explores language means used in Twitter messages (http://twitter.com) by BLM activists between May 25 and 31, 2020, in the aftermath of Floyd's death. The article reveals that #BlackLivesMatter tweets expose the discourse of inequality, injustice and racism across the American nation and that Twitter is used by the black minority marginalized in the American society as an alternative space to (re)construct the public sphere and to challenge the mainstream mass media dominated by the white ideology. The linguistic analysis uncovers the divisive nature of #BlackLivesMatter messages on Twitter expressed by the emphatic blacks vs whites opposition as well as their particularism that becomes pronounced in the debates of BLM activists with the universalist #AllLivesMatter supporters. Key words: digital activism, public sphere, #BlackLivesMatter, Twitter, public discourse, critical discourse analysis. Information about the authors: Bondarenko Valeria Valeriivna – PhD in English Philology, Associate Professor; Associate Professor of the Department of English Philology and Intercultural Communication; Institute of Philology; Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Kaptiurova Olena Viacheslavivna – PhD in English Philology, Associate Professor; Associate Professor of the Department of English Philology and Intercultural Communication; Institute of Philology; Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Orlova Vira Volodymyrivna – PhD in English Philology, Assistant Professor of the Department of English Philology and Intercultural Communication; Institute of Philology; Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. E-mail: [e-mail]; [e-mail];  [e-mail]   REFERENCES • Benford, R.D., & Snow, D.A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639 [in English]. • Birkland, T. A. (1997). After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press [in English]. • Black lives Matter. (n.d.). About. Retrieved August 29, 2020. URL: https://blacklivesmatter.com/about/ [in English]. • Brock, A. (2012). From the Blackhand Side: Twitter as a Cultural Conversation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 529-549. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732147 [in English]. • Cheung, H. (2020). George Floyd death: Why US protests are so powerful this time. BBC News. URL: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-uscanada-52969905 (last access: 18.05.2020) [in English]. • Clark, M. (2019). To tweet our own cause: A mixed-methods study of the online phenomenon "Black Twitter". University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. https://doi.org/10.17615/7bfs-rp55 [in English]. • Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (Eds.). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: SAGE, 121-139 [in English]. • Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In T.A. van Dijk (Ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction (pp.258-284). London: Sage [in English]. • Freelon, D., McIlwain, C., & Clark, M. (2016). Beyond the Hashtags: #Ferguson, #Blacklivesmatter, and the Online Struggle for Offline Justice. Center for Media and Social Impact. Washington, DC, American University [in English]. • Fuentes, M. A. (2014). Digital activism. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved August 8, 2020. URL: https://www.britannica.com/ topic/digital-activism (last access: 18.05.2020) [in English]. • Habermas, J. (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [in English]. • Hall, S. (1985). Signification, representation, ideology: Althusser and the poststructuralist debates. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 2 (2), 91-114 [in English]. • Hall, S. (1997). Race, the floating signifier. Featuring Stuart Hall. [Video Transcript]. Northampton, MA: Media Education Foundation. URL: https://www.mediaed.org/transcripts/Stuart-Hall-Race-the-Floating-SignifierTranscript.pdf (last access: 18.05.2020) [in English]. • Ince, J., Rojas,, & Davis, C.A. (2017). The social media response to Black Lives Matter: how Twitter users interact with Black Lives Matter through hashtag use. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(11), 1814-1830 [in English]. • Janks, H. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis as a Research Tool, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18(3), 329-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/0159630970180302 [in English]. • Ramsey, D., X. (2015). The Truth About Black Twitter. The Atlantic. URL: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/04/the-truth-about-black-twitter/390120/ [in English]. • Singh, M. (2020). The armed white men who terrorized Philadelphia's Black Lives Matter supporters. The Guardian. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/04/philadelphia-armed-white-men-george-floyd-protests (last access: 18.05.2020) [in English]. • Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International social movement research, 1(1), 197-217 [in English]. • Van Dijk, T.A. (2008). Discourse and power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan [in English].