Predicting the results of evaluation procedures of academics

Background The 2010 reform of the Italian university system introduced the National Scientific Habilitation (ASN) as a requirement for applying to permanent professor positions. Since the CVs of the 59,149 candidates and the results of their assessments have been made publicly available, the ASN con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francesco Poggi, Paolo Ciancarini, Aldo Gangemi, Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese, Silvio Peroni, Valentina Presutti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2019-06-01
Series:PeerJ Computer Science
Subjects:
ASN
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/cs-199.pdf
id doaj-0b9045a7e6e74660baed1b4ac380c525
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0b9045a7e6e74660baed1b4ac380c5252020-11-25T01:40:12ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ Computer Science2376-59922019-06-015e19910.7717/peerj-cs.199Predicting the results of evaluation procedures of academicsFrancesco Poggi0Paolo Ciancarini1Aldo Gangemi2Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese3Silvio Peroni4Valentina Presutti5Department of Computer Science and Engineering (DISI), University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering (DISI), University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Classical Philology and Italian Studies, University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalySTLab, Institute of Cognitive Science and Technologies, National Research Council, Roma, ItalyDepartment of Classical Philology and Italian Studies, University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalySTLab, Institute of Cognitive Science and Technologies, National Research Council, Roma, ItalyBackground The 2010 reform of the Italian university system introduced the National Scientific Habilitation (ASN) as a requirement for applying to permanent professor positions. Since the CVs of the 59,149 candidates and the results of their assessments have been made publicly available, the ASN constitutes an opportunity to perform analyses about a nation-wide evaluation process. Objective The main goals of this paper are: (i) predicting the ASN results using the information contained in the candidates’ CVs; (ii) identifying a small set of quantitative indicators that can be used to perform accurate predictions. Approach Semantic technologies are used to extract, systematize and enrich the information contained in the applicants’ CVs, and machine learning methods are used to predict the ASN results and to identify a subset of relevant predictors. Results For predicting the success in the role of associate professor, our best models using all and the top 15 predictors make accurate predictions (F-measure values higher than 0.6) in 88% and 88.6% of the cases, respectively. Similar results have been achieved for the role of full professor. Evaluation The proposed approach outperforms the other models developed to predict the results of researchers’ evaluation procedures. Conclusions Such results allow the development of an automated system for supporting both candidates and committees in the future ASN sessions and other scholars’ evaluation procedures.https://peerj.com/articles/cs-199.pdfPredictive ModelsScientometricsResearch EvaluationData ProcessingASNMachine Learning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Francesco Poggi
Paolo Ciancarini
Aldo Gangemi
Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese
Silvio Peroni
Valentina Presutti
spellingShingle Francesco Poggi
Paolo Ciancarini
Aldo Gangemi
Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese
Silvio Peroni
Valentina Presutti
Predicting the results of evaluation procedures of academics
PeerJ Computer Science
Predictive Models
Scientometrics
Research Evaluation
Data Processing
ASN
Machine Learning
author_facet Francesco Poggi
Paolo Ciancarini
Aldo Gangemi
Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese
Silvio Peroni
Valentina Presutti
author_sort Francesco Poggi
title Predicting the results of evaluation procedures of academics
title_short Predicting the results of evaluation procedures of academics
title_full Predicting the results of evaluation procedures of academics
title_fullStr Predicting the results of evaluation procedures of academics
title_full_unstemmed Predicting the results of evaluation procedures of academics
title_sort predicting the results of evaluation procedures of academics
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ Computer Science
issn 2376-5992
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Background The 2010 reform of the Italian university system introduced the National Scientific Habilitation (ASN) as a requirement for applying to permanent professor positions. Since the CVs of the 59,149 candidates and the results of their assessments have been made publicly available, the ASN constitutes an opportunity to perform analyses about a nation-wide evaluation process. Objective The main goals of this paper are: (i) predicting the ASN results using the information contained in the candidates’ CVs; (ii) identifying a small set of quantitative indicators that can be used to perform accurate predictions. Approach Semantic technologies are used to extract, systematize and enrich the information contained in the applicants’ CVs, and machine learning methods are used to predict the ASN results and to identify a subset of relevant predictors. Results For predicting the success in the role of associate professor, our best models using all and the top 15 predictors make accurate predictions (F-measure values higher than 0.6) in 88% and 88.6% of the cases, respectively. Similar results have been achieved for the role of full professor. Evaluation The proposed approach outperforms the other models developed to predict the results of researchers’ evaluation procedures. Conclusions Such results allow the development of an automated system for supporting both candidates and committees in the future ASN sessions and other scholars’ evaluation procedures.
topic Predictive Models
Scientometrics
Research Evaluation
Data Processing
ASN
Machine Learning
url https://peerj.com/articles/cs-199.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT francescopoggi predictingtheresultsofevaluationproceduresofacademics
AT paolociancarini predictingtheresultsofevaluationproceduresofacademics
AT aldogangemi predictingtheresultsofevaluationproceduresofacademics
AT andreagiovanninuzzolese predictingtheresultsofevaluationproceduresofacademics
AT silvioperoni predictingtheresultsofevaluationproceduresofacademics
AT valentinapresutti predictingtheresultsofevaluationproceduresofacademics
_version_ 1725046439750402048