Assessing imprecision in Cochrane systematic reviews: a comparison of GRADE and Trial Sequential Analysis
Abstract Background The evaluation of imprecision is a key dimension of the grading of the confidence in the estimate. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) gives recommendations on how to downgrade evidence for imprecision, but authors vary in their use. Trial Se...
Main Authors: | Greta Castellini, Matteo Bruschettini, Silvia Gianola, Christian Gluud, Lorenzo Moja |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-07-01
|
Series: | Systematic Reviews |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-018-0770-1 |
Similar Items
-
Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: "P" values, statistical significance and confidence intervals
by: Priya Ranganathan, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
General concepts in biostatistics and clinical epidemiology: Random error and systematic error
by: Felipe Barraza, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01) -
Risk of bias judgements and strength of conclusions in meta-evidence from the Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group
by: John Delaney, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01) -
How to interpret clinical trials with sequential analysis that were stopped early
by: Luis Ignacio Garegnani, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01) -
A meta-epidemiological study of subgroup analyses in cochrane systematic reviews of atrial fibrillation
by: Miney Paquette, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01)