Student retention policies in public higher education in comparative perspective: Argentina, Brazil and Chile

The higher education systems in Argentina, Brazil and Chile have considerable differences in relation to their origins and structures, but the elitist characteristic is a common feature of the three countries. There have been massification processes going on along the last three decades, supported b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hustana Maria Vargas, Rosana Heringer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arizona State University 2017-07-01
Series:Education Policy Analysis Archives
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2799
id doaj-0b7cf0bb04f5408eace217350623722d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0b7cf0bb04f5408eace217350623722d2020-11-25T03:16:22ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412017-07-0125010.14507/epaa.25.27991643Student retention policies in public higher education in comparative perspective: Argentina, Brazil and ChileHustana Maria Vargas0Rosana Heringer1Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFFUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJThe higher education systems in Argentina, Brazil and Chile have considerable differences in relation to their origins and structures, but the elitist characteristic is a common feature of the three countries. There have been massification processes going on along the last three decades, supported by expansion of the system as well as by the adoption of affirmative action policies. Considering the multidimensional problems of student retention, given its financial, cultural, symbolic and psychological aspects, we are interested in analyzing, in a comparative perspective, the practices related to national/federal higher education students in these three countries. We have selected a few key categories for comparison, such as: 1) views about student retention in normative documents: Right? Assistance? 2) judicial and political nature of these actions: State commitment? Isolated actions? 3) institutional autonomy to design their own student retention models; 4) main student retention models found. Beyond the theoretical contributions, the analysis is based on national legislation about these issues, national level secondary data provided by educational agencies in each country and information provided by selected higher education institutions. This is mainly a descriptive effort, based on historical, legal and socioeconomic aspects, with the aim of giving an overview about the programs in different national contexts.https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2799educação superioracessopermanênciaArgentinaBrasilChile
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hustana Maria Vargas
Rosana Heringer
spellingShingle Hustana Maria Vargas
Rosana Heringer
Student retention policies in public higher education in comparative perspective: Argentina, Brazil and Chile
Education Policy Analysis Archives
educação superior
acesso
permanência
Argentina
Brasil
Chile
author_facet Hustana Maria Vargas
Rosana Heringer
author_sort Hustana Maria Vargas
title Student retention policies in public higher education in comparative perspective: Argentina, Brazil and Chile
title_short Student retention policies in public higher education in comparative perspective: Argentina, Brazil and Chile
title_full Student retention policies in public higher education in comparative perspective: Argentina, Brazil and Chile
title_fullStr Student retention policies in public higher education in comparative perspective: Argentina, Brazil and Chile
title_full_unstemmed Student retention policies in public higher education in comparative perspective: Argentina, Brazil and Chile
title_sort student retention policies in public higher education in comparative perspective: argentina, brazil and chile
publisher Arizona State University
series Education Policy Analysis Archives
issn 1068-2341
publishDate 2017-07-01
description The higher education systems in Argentina, Brazil and Chile have considerable differences in relation to their origins and structures, but the elitist characteristic is a common feature of the three countries. There have been massification processes going on along the last three decades, supported by expansion of the system as well as by the adoption of affirmative action policies. Considering the multidimensional problems of student retention, given its financial, cultural, symbolic and psychological aspects, we are interested in analyzing, in a comparative perspective, the practices related to national/federal higher education students in these three countries. We have selected a few key categories for comparison, such as: 1) views about student retention in normative documents: Right? Assistance? 2) judicial and political nature of these actions: State commitment? Isolated actions? 3) institutional autonomy to design their own student retention models; 4) main student retention models found. Beyond the theoretical contributions, the analysis is based on national legislation about these issues, national level secondary data provided by educational agencies in each country and information provided by selected higher education institutions. This is mainly a descriptive effort, based on historical, legal and socioeconomic aspects, with the aim of giving an overview about the programs in different national contexts.
topic educação superior
acesso
permanência
Argentina
Brasil
Chile
url https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2799
work_keys_str_mv AT hustanamariavargas studentretentionpoliciesinpublichighereducationincomparativeperspectiveargentinabrazilandchile
AT rosanaheringer studentretentionpoliciesinpublichighereducationincomparativeperspectiveargentinabrazilandchile
_version_ 1724636646774669312