The Noisy Brain: Power of Resting-State Fluctuations Predicts Individual Recognition Performance

Summary: The unique profile of strong and weak cognitive traits characterizing each individual is of a fundamental significance, yet their neurophysiological underpinnings remain elusive. Here, we present intracranial electroencephalogram (iEEG) measurements in humans pointing to resting-state corti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shany Grossman, Erin M. Yeagle, Michal Harel, Elizabeth Espinal, Roy Harpaz, Niv Noy, Pierre Mégevand, David M. Groppe, Ashesh D. Mehta, Rafael Malach
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019-12-01
Series:Cell Reports
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211124719315724
id doaj-0b64fd5d7cd64839823cb43182e6c164
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0b64fd5d7cd64839823cb43182e6c1642020-11-25T01:37:09ZengElsevierCell Reports2211-12472019-12-01291237753784.e4The Noisy Brain: Power of Resting-State Fluctuations Predicts Individual Recognition PerformanceShany Grossman0Erin M. Yeagle1Michal Harel2Elizabeth Espinal3Roy Harpaz4Niv Noy5Pierre Mégevand6David M. Groppe7Ashesh D. Mehta8Rafael Malach9Department of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel; The Azrieli National Institute for Human Brain Imaging and Research, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, IsraelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, and Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY 11030, USADepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel; The Azrieli National Institute for Human Brain Imaging and Research, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, IsraelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, and Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY 11030, USADepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel; The Azrieli National Institute for Human Brain Imaging and Research, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel; Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USADepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel; The Azrieli National Institute for Human Brain Imaging and Research, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, IsraelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, and Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA; Neurology Division, Clinical Neuroscience Department, Geneva University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva 1205, SwitzerlandDepartment of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, and Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY 11030, USA; The Krembil Neuroscience Centre, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, CanadaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, and Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY 11030, USADepartment of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel; The Azrieli National Institute for Human Brain Imaging and Research, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel; Corresponding authorSummary: The unique profile of strong and weak cognitive traits characterizing each individual is of a fundamental significance, yet their neurophysiological underpinnings remain elusive. Here, we present intracranial electroencephalogram (iEEG) measurements in humans pointing to resting-state cortical “noise” as a possible neurophysiological trait that limits visual recognition capacity. We show that amplitudes of slow (<1 Hz) spontaneous fluctuations in high-frequency power measured during rest were predictive of the patients’ performance in a visual recognition 1-back task (26 patients, total of 1,389 bipolar contacts pairs). Importantly, the effect was selective only to task-related cortical sites. The prediction was significant even across long (mean distance 4.6 ± 2.8 days) lags. These findings highlight the level of the individuals’ internal “noise” as a trait that limits performance in externally oriented demanding tasks. : The amplitude of neural fluctuations during rest varies between individuals and cortical networks. Using intracranial recordings in patients, Grossman et al. find that the amplitudes of slow (<1 Hz) fluctuations during rest are predictive of individual differences in recognition memory performance, a link that is specific to task-relevant cortical sites. Keywords: resting state, neural noise, individual differences, cognitive abilities, iEEG, ECoG, spontaneous fluctuations, 1-back task, neural variabilityhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211124719315724
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shany Grossman
Erin M. Yeagle
Michal Harel
Elizabeth Espinal
Roy Harpaz
Niv Noy
Pierre Mégevand
David M. Groppe
Ashesh D. Mehta
Rafael Malach
spellingShingle Shany Grossman
Erin M. Yeagle
Michal Harel
Elizabeth Espinal
Roy Harpaz
Niv Noy
Pierre Mégevand
David M. Groppe
Ashesh D. Mehta
Rafael Malach
The Noisy Brain: Power of Resting-State Fluctuations Predicts Individual Recognition Performance
Cell Reports
author_facet Shany Grossman
Erin M. Yeagle
Michal Harel
Elizabeth Espinal
Roy Harpaz
Niv Noy
Pierre Mégevand
David M. Groppe
Ashesh D. Mehta
Rafael Malach
author_sort Shany Grossman
title The Noisy Brain: Power of Resting-State Fluctuations Predicts Individual Recognition Performance
title_short The Noisy Brain: Power of Resting-State Fluctuations Predicts Individual Recognition Performance
title_full The Noisy Brain: Power of Resting-State Fluctuations Predicts Individual Recognition Performance
title_fullStr The Noisy Brain: Power of Resting-State Fluctuations Predicts Individual Recognition Performance
title_full_unstemmed The Noisy Brain: Power of Resting-State Fluctuations Predicts Individual Recognition Performance
title_sort noisy brain: power of resting-state fluctuations predicts individual recognition performance
publisher Elsevier
series Cell Reports
issn 2211-1247
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Summary: The unique profile of strong and weak cognitive traits characterizing each individual is of a fundamental significance, yet their neurophysiological underpinnings remain elusive. Here, we present intracranial electroencephalogram (iEEG) measurements in humans pointing to resting-state cortical “noise” as a possible neurophysiological trait that limits visual recognition capacity. We show that amplitudes of slow (<1 Hz) spontaneous fluctuations in high-frequency power measured during rest were predictive of the patients’ performance in a visual recognition 1-back task (26 patients, total of 1,389 bipolar contacts pairs). Importantly, the effect was selective only to task-related cortical sites. The prediction was significant even across long (mean distance 4.6 ± 2.8 days) lags. These findings highlight the level of the individuals’ internal “noise” as a trait that limits performance in externally oriented demanding tasks. : The amplitude of neural fluctuations during rest varies between individuals and cortical networks. Using intracranial recordings in patients, Grossman et al. find that the amplitudes of slow (<1 Hz) fluctuations during rest are predictive of individual differences in recognition memory performance, a link that is specific to task-relevant cortical sites. Keywords: resting state, neural noise, individual differences, cognitive abilities, iEEG, ECoG, spontaneous fluctuations, 1-back task, neural variability
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211124719315724
work_keys_str_mv AT shanygrossman thenoisybrainpowerofrestingstatefluctuationspredictsindividualrecognitionperformance
AT erinmyeagle thenoisybrainpowerofrestingstatefluctuationspredictsindividualrecognitionperformance
AT michalharel thenoisybrainpowerofrestingstatefluctuationspredictsindividualrecognitionperformance
AT elizabethespinal thenoisybrainpowerofrestingstatefluctuationspredictsindividualrecognitionperformance
AT royharpaz thenoisybrainpowerofrestingstatefluctuationspredictsindividualrecognitionperformance
AT nivnoy thenoisybrainpowerofrestingstatefluctuationspredictsindividualrecognitionperformance
AT pierremegevand thenoisybrainpowerofrestingstatefluctuationspredictsindividualrecognitionperformance
AT davidmgroppe thenoisybrainpowerofrestingstatefluctuationspredictsindividualrecognitionperformance
AT asheshdmehta thenoisybrainpowerofrestingstatefluctuationspredictsindividualrecognitionperformance
AT rafaelmalach thenoisybrainpowerofrestingstatefluctuationspredictsindividualrecognitionperformance
AT shanygrossman noisybrainpowerofrestingstatefluctuationspredictsindividualrecognitionperformance
AT erinmyeagle noisybrainpowerofrestingstatefluctuationspredictsindividualrecognitionperformance
AT michalharel noisybrainpowerofrestingstatefluctuationspredictsindividualrecognitionperformance
AT elizabethespinal noisybrainpowerofrestingstatefluctuationspredictsindividualrecognitionperformance
AT royharpaz noisybrainpowerofrestingstatefluctuationspredictsindividualrecognitionperformance
AT nivnoy noisybrainpowerofrestingstatefluctuationspredictsindividualrecognitionperformance
AT pierremegevand noisybrainpowerofrestingstatefluctuationspredictsindividualrecognitionperformance
AT davidmgroppe noisybrainpowerofrestingstatefluctuationspredictsindividualrecognitionperformance
AT asheshdmehta noisybrainpowerofrestingstatefluctuationspredictsindividualrecognitionperformance
AT rafaelmalach noisybrainpowerofrestingstatefluctuationspredictsindividualrecognitionperformance
_version_ 1725059394360573952