Natural Alternatives to Natural Number: The Case of Ratio

The overwhelming majority of efforts to cultivate early mathematical thinking rely primarily on counting and associated natural number concepts. Unfortunately, natural numbers and discretized thinking do not align well with a large swath of the mathematical concepts we wish for children to learn. Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Percival G. Matthews, Amy B. Ellis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PsychOpen 2018-06-01
Series:Journal of Numerical Cognition
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jnc.psychopen.eu/article/view/97
id doaj-0b5bcce89c4b41a399643fbce2bdee7f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0b5bcce89c4b41a399643fbce2bdee7f2020-11-25T00:03:39ZengPsychOpenJournal of Numerical Cognition2363-87612018-06-0141195810.5964/jnc.v4i1.97jnc.v4i1.97Natural Alternatives to Natural Number: The Case of RatioPercival G. Matthews0Amy B. Ellis1University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USAUniversity of Georgia, Athens, GA, USAThe overwhelming majority of efforts to cultivate early mathematical thinking rely primarily on counting and associated natural number concepts. Unfortunately, natural numbers and discretized thinking do not align well with a large swath of the mathematical concepts we wish for children to learn. This misalignment presents an important impediment to teaching and learning. We suggest that one way to circumvent these pitfalls is to leverage students’ non-numerical experiences that can provide intuitive access to foundational mathematical concepts. Specifically, we advocate for explicitly leveraging a) students’ perceptually based intuitions about quantity and b) students’ reasoning about change and variation, and we address the affordances offered by this approach. We argue that it can support ways of thinking that may at times align better with to-be-learned mathematical ideas, and thus may serve as a productive alternative for particular mathematical concepts when compared to number. We illustrate this argument using the domain of ratio, and we do so from the distinct disciplinary lenses we employ respectively as a cognitive psychologist and as a mathematics education researcher. Finally, we discuss the potential for productive synthesis given the substantial differences in our preferred methods and general epistemologies.http://jnc.psychopen.eu/article/view/97numberperceptionratiorational number
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Percival G. Matthews
Amy B. Ellis
spellingShingle Percival G. Matthews
Amy B. Ellis
Natural Alternatives to Natural Number: The Case of Ratio
Journal of Numerical Cognition
number
perception
ratio
rational number
author_facet Percival G. Matthews
Amy B. Ellis
author_sort Percival G. Matthews
title Natural Alternatives to Natural Number: The Case of Ratio
title_short Natural Alternatives to Natural Number: The Case of Ratio
title_full Natural Alternatives to Natural Number: The Case of Ratio
title_fullStr Natural Alternatives to Natural Number: The Case of Ratio
title_full_unstemmed Natural Alternatives to Natural Number: The Case of Ratio
title_sort natural alternatives to natural number: the case of ratio
publisher PsychOpen
series Journal of Numerical Cognition
issn 2363-8761
publishDate 2018-06-01
description The overwhelming majority of efforts to cultivate early mathematical thinking rely primarily on counting and associated natural number concepts. Unfortunately, natural numbers and discretized thinking do not align well with a large swath of the mathematical concepts we wish for children to learn. This misalignment presents an important impediment to teaching and learning. We suggest that one way to circumvent these pitfalls is to leverage students’ non-numerical experiences that can provide intuitive access to foundational mathematical concepts. Specifically, we advocate for explicitly leveraging a) students’ perceptually based intuitions about quantity and b) students’ reasoning about change and variation, and we address the affordances offered by this approach. We argue that it can support ways of thinking that may at times align better with to-be-learned mathematical ideas, and thus may serve as a productive alternative for particular mathematical concepts when compared to number. We illustrate this argument using the domain of ratio, and we do so from the distinct disciplinary lenses we employ respectively as a cognitive psychologist and as a mathematics education researcher. Finally, we discuss the potential for productive synthesis given the substantial differences in our preferred methods and general epistemologies.
topic number
perception
ratio
rational number
url http://jnc.psychopen.eu/article/view/97
work_keys_str_mv AT percivalgmatthews naturalalternativestonaturalnumberthecaseofratio
AT amybellis naturalalternativestonaturalnumberthecaseofratio
_version_ 1725432725972713472