Screening of the pelvic organ prolapse without a physical examination; (a community based study)

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a silent disorder with a huge impact on women's quality of life. There is limited data from community-based studies conducted to determine the prevalence of POP as its assessment needs a pelvic exa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tehrani Fahimeh, Hashemi Somayeh, Simbar Masoumeh, Shiva Niloofar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-11-01
Series:BMC Women's Health
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/11/48
id doaj-0b5a7a6c39034e139397271697aa02f5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0b5a7a6c39034e139397271697aa02f52020-11-25T02:25:21ZengBMCBMC Women's Health1472-68742011-11-011114810.1186/1472-6874-11-48Screening of the pelvic organ prolapse without a physical examination; (a community based study)Tehrani FahimehHashemi SomayehSimbar MasoumehShiva Niloofar<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a silent disorder with a huge impact on women's quality of life. There is limited data from community-based studies conducted to determine the prevalence of POP as its assessment needs a pelvic examination. We aimed to develop a simple screening inventory for identification of pelvic organ prolapse and then evaluate its sensitivity and specificity.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This study had two phases. In the first phase in order to develop a simple inventory for assessment of POP, the Pelvic Floor Disorder Inventory (PFDI) was completed for a convenience sample of 200 women, aged 18-45 years, referred for annual gynecologic examination, and their pelvic organ prolapse was assessed using the standard protocol. The most sensitive and specific questions were selected as pelvic organ prolapse simple screening inventory (POPSSI). In the second phase, using a stratified multistage probability cluster sampling method, the sensitivity and specificity of the POPSSI was investigated in a non selected sample of 954 women recruited from among reproductive aged women living in four randomly selected provinces of Iran.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The sensitivity and specificity of POPSSI for identification of pelvic organ prolapse in the general population were 45.5 and 87.4% respectively; these values were 96.7 and 20% among those women who were aware of their pelvic dysfunction.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Community based screening studies on pelvic organ prolapse could be facilitated by using the POPSSI, the sensitivity of which would be enhanced through conducting of public awareness programs.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/11/48
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tehrani Fahimeh
Hashemi Somayeh
Simbar Masoumeh
Shiva Niloofar
spellingShingle Tehrani Fahimeh
Hashemi Somayeh
Simbar Masoumeh
Shiva Niloofar
Screening of the pelvic organ prolapse without a physical examination; (a community based study)
BMC Women's Health
author_facet Tehrani Fahimeh
Hashemi Somayeh
Simbar Masoumeh
Shiva Niloofar
author_sort Tehrani Fahimeh
title Screening of the pelvic organ prolapse without a physical examination; (a community based study)
title_short Screening of the pelvic organ prolapse without a physical examination; (a community based study)
title_full Screening of the pelvic organ prolapse without a physical examination; (a community based study)
title_fullStr Screening of the pelvic organ prolapse without a physical examination; (a community based study)
title_full_unstemmed Screening of the pelvic organ prolapse without a physical examination; (a community based study)
title_sort screening of the pelvic organ prolapse without a physical examination; (a community based study)
publisher BMC
series BMC Women's Health
issn 1472-6874
publishDate 2011-11-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a silent disorder with a huge impact on women's quality of life. There is limited data from community-based studies conducted to determine the prevalence of POP as its assessment needs a pelvic examination. We aimed to develop a simple screening inventory for identification of pelvic organ prolapse and then evaluate its sensitivity and specificity.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>This study had two phases. In the first phase in order to develop a simple inventory for assessment of POP, the Pelvic Floor Disorder Inventory (PFDI) was completed for a convenience sample of 200 women, aged 18-45 years, referred for annual gynecologic examination, and their pelvic organ prolapse was assessed using the standard protocol. The most sensitive and specific questions were selected as pelvic organ prolapse simple screening inventory (POPSSI). In the second phase, using a stratified multistage probability cluster sampling method, the sensitivity and specificity of the POPSSI was investigated in a non selected sample of 954 women recruited from among reproductive aged women living in four randomly selected provinces of Iran.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The sensitivity and specificity of POPSSI for identification of pelvic organ prolapse in the general population were 45.5 and 87.4% respectively; these values were 96.7 and 20% among those women who were aware of their pelvic dysfunction.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Community based screening studies on pelvic organ prolapse could be facilitated by using the POPSSI, the sensitivity of which would be enhanced through conducting of public awareness programs.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6874/11/48
work_keys_str_mv AT tehranifahimeh screeningofthepelvicorganprolapsewithoutaphysicalexaminationacommunitybasedstudy
AT hashemisomayeh screeningofthepelvicorganprolapsewithoutaphysicalexaminationacommunitybasedstudy
AT simbarmasoumeh screeningofthepelvicorganprolapsewithoutaphysicalexaminationacommunitybasedstudy
AT shivaniloofar screeningofthepelvicorganprolapsewithoutaphysicalexaminationacommunitybasedstudy
_version_ 1724851611327528960