Complicating the rhetoric: How racial construction confounds market-based reformers’ civil rights invocations

Reformers today maintain the use of civil rights rhetoric when advocating for policies that address educational inequity. While continuing the legacy of earlier civil rights activists, the leaders invoking this rhetoric and the educational platforms they promote differ greatly from previous decades....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Laura Elena Hernandez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arizona State University 2016-10-01
Series:Education Policy Analysis Archives
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2321
id doaj-0b4e326d20914b6eb6f8cd9b4ec67725
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0b4e326d20914b6eb6f8cd9b4ec677252020-11-25T03:51:31ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412016-10-0124010.14507/epaa.24.23211548Complicating the rhetoric: How racial construction confounds market-based reformers’ civil rights invocationsLaura Elena Hernandez0University of California, BerkeleyReformers today maintain the use of civil rights rhetoric when advocating for policies that address educational inequity. While continuing the legacy of earlier civil rights activists, the leaders invoking this rhetoric and the educational platforms they promote differ greatly from previous decades. Not only does this new crop of reformers differ demographically, they also tend to promote market-oriented initiatives like the expansion of charter schools and other school choice initiatives, which embody market logics alongside a sharp retrenchment from the public sphere. While scholars have revealed how these policies generate questionable outcomes for students and communities of color, few have considered the manner in which marginalized racial groups are characterized and framed amidst these reforms and cries for civil rights. In this empirical paper, I use Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to analyze how race-based constructions complicate the use of civil rights rhetoric in today’s increasingly marketized educational context. Specifically, I investigate how two educational leaders discuss race within comments about education and its connection to civil rights. The findings suggest that the leaders allude to race without explicitly naming it in the context of civil rights discourse. In addition, their civil rights invocations exist alongside subtly constructed, negative racial narratives that they articulate in the context of their statements. Given these findings, this paper ends with a discussion of these seemingly incompatible discourses. In particular, I interrogate how these racial constructions reflect the characteristics of colorblindness and how this, in turn, may undermine policies the aim to address racial inequity.https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2321rhetoric, race, civil rights, discourse analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laura Elena Hernandez
spellingShingle Laura Elena Hernandez
Complicating the rhetoric: How racial construction confounds market-based reformers’ civil rights invocations
Education Policy Analysis Archives
rhetoric, race, civil rights, discourse analysis
author_facet Laura Elena Hernandez
author_sort Laura Elena Hernandez
title Complicating the rhetoric: How racial construction confounds market-based reformers’ civil rights invocations
title_short Complicating the rhetoric: How racial construction confounds market-based reformers’ civil rights invocations
title_full Complicating the rhetoric: How racial construction confounds market-based reformers’ civil rights invocations
title_fullStr Complicating the rhetoric: How racial construction confounds market-based reformers’ civil rights invocations
title_full_unstemmed Complicating the rhetoric: How racial construction confounds market-based reformers’ civil rights invocations
title_sort complicating the rhetoric: how racial construction confounds market-based reformers’ civil rights invocations
publisher Arizona State University
series Education Policy Analysis Archives
issn 1068-2341
publishDate 2016-10-01
description Reformers today maintain the use of civil rights rhetoric when advocating for policies that address educational inequity. While continuing the legacy of earlier civil rights activists, the leaders invoking this rhetoric and the educational platforms they promote differ greatly from previous decades. Not only does this new crop of reformers differ demographically, they also tend to promote market-oriented initiatives like the expansion of charter schools and other school choice initiatives, which embody market logics alongside a sharp retrenchment from the public sphere. While scholars have revealed how these policies generate questionable outcomes for students and communities of color, few have considered the manner in which marginalized racial groups are characterized and framed amidst these reforms and cries for civil rights. In this empirical paper, I use Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to analyze how race-based constructions complicate the use of civil rights rhetoric in today’s increasingly marketized educational context. Specifically, I investigate how two educational leaders discuss race within comments about education and its connection to civil rights. The findings suggest that the leaders allude to race without explicitly naming it in the context of civil rights discourse. In addition, their civil rights invocations exist alongside subtly constructed, negative racial narratives that they articulate in the context of their statements. Given these findings, this paper ends with a discussion of these seemingly incompatible discourses. In particular, I interrogate how these racial constructions reflect the characteristics of colorblindness and how this, in turn, may undermine policies the aim to address racial inequity.
topic rhetoric, race, civil rights, discourse analysis
url https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/2321
work_keys_str_mv AT lauraelenahernandez complicatingtherhetorichowracialconstructionconfoundsmarketbasedreformerscivilrightsinvocations
_version_ 1724487193361121280