The decision of the International Court of Justice related to preliminary exceptions in the Nicaragua v. Colombia case
This article is divided into three main parts. The fi rst part presents the precedents in the case relating to delimiting the Caribbean Sea boundary between Nicaragua and Colombia. It analyzes the competence of the International Court of Justice – ICJ (the Court) in accordance with Article 36 of the...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad del Rosario
2010-05-01
|
Series: | ACDI: Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/acdi/article/view/1099 |
id |
doaj-0b41f363c0164e4da8867df47035ce6b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0b41f363c0164e4da8867df47035ce6b2020-11-25T00:05:03ZengUniversidad del RosarioACDI: Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional2027-11312145-44932010-05-0120988The decision of the International Court of Justice related to preliminary exceptions in the Nicaragua v. Colombia caseRafael Nieto Navia0l’Institut de Droit InternationalThis article is divided into three main parts. The fi rst part presents the precedents in the case relating to delimiting the Caribbean Sea boundary between Nicaragua and Colombia. It analyzes the competence of the International Court of Justice – ICJ (the Court) in accordance with Article 36 of the Statute of the Court; consequently, it studies the Declaration of the acceptance of the Competence of the Court presented by Colombia to the Permanent Court of International Justice in 1937 as well as the Bogota Pact of 1948 as to its applicability and breadth as regards the 1928 EsguerraBárcenas Treaty. The second part presents a detailed analysis of the decision of the Court on the preliminary exceptions in which it was determined that the sovereignty of the islands of San Andres, Providencia, and Santa Catalina was Colombian, that the Esguerra-Bárcenas Treaty was not treaty delimiting maritime boundaries and that it (the Court) was competent to get to the foundation of the matter. The third part sets out the actions which still must be completed relative to the foundation of the case.http://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/acdi/article/view/1099Corte Internacional de Justicia, Competencia, jurisdicción, declaración de aceptación de la competencia, Pacto de Bogotá, Tratado Esguerra-Bárcenas, excepciones preliminares. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Rafael Nieto Navia |
spellingShingle |
Rafael Nieto Navia The decision of the International Court of Justice related to preliminary exceptions in the Nicaragua v. Colombia case ACDI: Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional Corte Internacional de Justicia, Competencia, jurisdicción, declaración de aceptación de la competencia, Pacto de Bogotá, Tratado Esguerra-Bárcenas, excepciones preliminares. |
author_facet |
Rafael Nieto Navia |
author_sort |
Rafael Nieto Navia |
title |
The decision of the International Court of Justice related to preliminary exceptions in the Nicaragua v. Colombia case |
title_short |
The decision of the International Court of Justice related to preliminary exceptions in the Nicaragua v. Colombia case |
title_full |
The decision of the International Court of Justice related to preliminary exceptions in the Nicaragua v. Colombia case |
title_fullStr |
The decision of the International Court of Justice related to preliminary exceptions in the Nicaragua v. Colombia case |
title_full_unstemmed |
The decision of the International Court of Justice related to preliminary exceptions in the Nicaragua v. Colombia case |
title_sort |
decision of the international court of justice related to preliminary exceptions in the nicaragua v. colombia case |
publisher |
Universidad del Rosario |
series |
ACDI: Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional |
issn |
2027-1131 2145-4493 |
publishDate |
2010-05-01 |
description |
This article is divided into three main parts. The fi rst part presents the precedents in the case relating to delimiting the Caribbean Sea boundary between Nicaragua and Colombia. It analyzes the competence of the International Court of Justice – ICJ (the Court) in accordance with Article 36 of the Statute of the Court; consequently, it studies the Declaration of the acceptance of the Competence of the Court presented by Colombia to the Permanent Court of International Justice in 1937 as well as the Bogota Pact of 1948 as to its applicability and breadth as regards the 1928 EsguerraBárcenas Treaty. The second part presents a detailed analysis of the decision of the Court on the preliminary exceptions in which it was determined that the sovereignty of the islands of San Andres, Providencia, and Santa Catalina was Colombian, that the Esguerra-Bárcenas Treaty was not treaty delimiting maritime boundaries and that it (the Court) was competent to get to the foundation of the matter. The third part sets out the actions which still must be completed relative to the foundation of the case. |
topic |
Corte Internacional de Justicia, Competencia, jurisdicción, declaración de aceptación de la competencia, Pacto de Bogotá, Tratado Esguerra-Bárcenas, excepciones preliminares. |
url |
http://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/acdi/article/view/1099 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rafaelnietonavia thedecisionoftheinternationalcourtofjusticerelatedtopreliminaryexceptionsinthenicaraguavcolombiacase AT rafaelnietonavia decisionoftheinternationalcourtofjusticerelatedtopreliminaryexceptionsinthenicaraguavcolombiacase |
_version_ |
1725426604476203008 |