The decision of the International Court of Justice related to preliminary exceptions in the Nicaragua v. Colombia case

This article is divided into three main parts. The fi rst part presents the precedents in the case relating to delimiting the Caribbean Sea boundary between Nicaragua and Colombia. It analyzes the competence of the International Court of Justice – ICJ (the Court) in accordance with Article 36 of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rafael Nieto Navia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad del Rosario 2010-05-01
Series:ACDI: Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional
Subjects:
Online Access:http://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/acdi/article/view/1099
id doaj-0b41f363c0164e4da8867df47035ce6b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0b41f363c0164e4da8867df47035ce6b2020-11-25T00:05:03ZengUniversidad del RosarioACDI: Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional2027-11312145-44932010-05-0120988The decision of the International Court of Justice related to preliminary exceptions in the Nicaragua v. Colombia caseRafael Nieto Navia0l’Institut de Droit InternationalThis article is divided into three main parts. The fi rst part presents the precedents in the case relating to delimiting the Caribbean Sea boundary between Nicaragua and Colombia. It analyzes the competence of the International Court of Justice – ICJ (the Court) in accordance with Article 36 of the Statute of the Court; consequently, it studies the Declaration of the acceptance of the Competence of the Court presented by Colombia to the Permanent Court of International Justice in 1937 as well as the Bogota Pact of 1948 as to its applicability and breadth as regards the 1928 EsguerraBárcenas Treaty. The second part presents a detailed analysis of the decision of the Court on the preliminary exceptions in which it was determined that the sovereignty of the islands of San Andres, Providencia, and Santa Catalina was Colombian, that the Esguerra-Bárcenas Treaty was not treaty delimiting maritime boundaries and that it (the Court) was competent to get to the foundation of the matter. The third part sets out the actions which still must be completed relative to the foundation of the case.http://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/acdi/article/view/1099Corte Internacional de Justicia, Competencia, jurisdicción, declaración de aceptación de la competencia, Pacto de Bogotá, Tratado Esguerra-Bárcenas, excepciones preliminares.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rafael Nieto Navia
spellingShingle Rafael Nieto Navia
The decision of the International Court of Justice related to preliminary exceptions in the Nicaragua v. Colombia case
ACDI: Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional
Corte Internacional de Justicia, Competencia, jurisdicción, declaración de aceptación de la competencia, Pacto de Bogotá, Tratado Esguerra-Bárcenas, excepciones preliminares.
author_facet Rafael Nieto Navia
author_sort Rafael Nieto Navia
title The decision of the International Court of Justice related to preliminary exceptions in the Nicaragua v. Colombia case
title_short The decision of the International Court of Justice related to preliminary exceptions in the Nicaragua v. Colombia case
title_full The decision of the International Court of Justice related to preliminary exceptions in the Nicaragua v. Colombia case
title_fullStr The decision of the International Court of Justice related to preliminary exceptions in the Nicaragua v. Colombia case
title_full_unstemmed The decision of the International Court of Justice related to preliminary exceptions in the Nicaragua v. Colombia case
title_sort decision of the international court of justice related to preliminary exceptions in the nicaragua v. colombia case
publisher Universidad del Rosario
series ACDI: Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional
issn 2027-1131
2145-4493
publishDate 2010-05-01
description This article is divided into three main parts. The fi rst part presents the precedents in the case relating to delimiting the Caribbean Sea boundary between Nicaragua and Colombia. It analyzes the competence of the International Court of Justice – ICJ (the Court) in accordance with Article 36 of the Statute of the Court; consequently, it studies the Declaration of the acceptance of the Competence of the Court presented by Colombia to the Permanent Court of International Justice in 1937 as well as the Bogota Pact of 1948 as to its applicability and breadth as regards the 1928 EsguerraBárcenas Treaty. The second part presents a detailed analysis of the decision of the Court on the preliminary exceptions in which it was determined that the sovereignty of the islands of San Andres, Providencia, and Santa Catalina was Colombian, that the Esguerra-Bárcenas Treaty was not treaty delimiting maritime boundaries and that it (the Court) was competent to get to the foundation of the matter. The third part sets out the actions which still must be completed relative to the foundation of the case.
topic Corte Internacional de Justicia, Competencia, jurisdicción, declaración de aceptación de la competencia, Pacto de Bogotá, Tratado Esguerra-Bárcenas, excepciones preliminares.
url http://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/acdi/article/view/1099
work_keys_str_mv AT rafaelnietonavia thedecisionoftheinternationalcourtofjusticerelatedtopreliminaryexceptionsinthenicaraguavcolombiacase
AT rafaelnietonavia decisionoftheinternationalcourtofjusticerelatedtopreliminaryexceptionsinthenicaraguavcolombiacase
_version_ 1725426604476203008