Assessment of Treated Wastewater Reuse in Drip Irrigation under Different Pressure Conditions

This study aims to investigate the influence of treated wastewater (TWW) on the hydraulic performance of drip irrigation emitters. A field experiment was conducted in order to test two types of online emitters, a low pressure (LP) and a standard pressure (SP), at different working pressures (0.25 ba...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naji K. Al-Mefleh, Samer Talozi, Khalid Abu Nasir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/8/1033
id doaj-0b2d9fe8428d4821b9b3d8727e539946
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0b2d9fe8428d4821b9b3d8727e5399462021-04-09T23:03:40ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412021-04-01131033103310.3390/w13081033Assessment of Treated Wastewater Reuse in Drip Irrigation under Different Pressure ConditionsNaji K. Al-Mefleh0Samer Talozi1Khalid Abu Nasir2Department of Natural Resources, Faculty of Agriculture, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid P.O. Box 3030, JordanCivil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid P.O. Box 3030, JordanDepartment of Natural Resources and Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Irbid P.O. Box 3030, JordanThis study aims to investigate the influence of treated wastewater (TWW) on the hydraulic performance of drip irrigation emitters. A field experiment was conducted in order to test two types of online emitters, a low pressure (LP) and a standard pressure (SP), at different working pressures (0.25 bar, 0.50 bar, and 1.00 bar) using TWW. The emitters were initially evaluated in the laboratory and the field for the discharge exponent (<i>X</i>), discharge coefficient (<i>Kd</i>), average emitter discharge (<i>Q<sub>avg</sub></i>), coefficient of variation (<i>CV</i>), distribution uniformity (<i>DU</i>), the mean discharge ratio (<i>Dra</i>), and the main degree of clogging (<i>DC</i>). The main effect of the emitters on the hydraulic parameters of irrigation performance was not significant, while the operational pressure and operational time of irrigation had a significant effect. For the LP emitter, the average emitter discharge was 7.6, 7.7, and 7.8 Lh<sup>−1</sup> at 0.25, 0.50, and 1.00 bar, respectively. For the SP emitter, the average emitter discharge was 7.6, 7.8, and 7.8 Lh<sup>−1</sup> at 0.25, 0.50, and 1.00 bar, respectively. The <i>EU</i> values for the LP and SP emitters varied from low to moderate at 0.25 bar, as the EU values at 0.50 and 1.00 bar were considered high for both emitter types.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/8/1033drip irrigationtreated wastewaterclogging emitterscompensated emittersemitter characteristics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Naji K. Al-Mefleh
Samer Talozi
Khalid Abu Nasir
spellingShingle Naji K. Al-Mefleh
Samer Talozi
Khalid Abu Nasir
Assessment of Treated Wastewater Reuse in Drip Irrigation under Different Pressure Conditions
Water
drip irrigation
treated wastewater
clogging emitters
compensated emitters
emitter characteristics
author_facet Naji K. Al-Mefleh
Samer Talozi
Khalid Abu Nasir
author_sort Naji K. Al-Mefleh
title Assessment of Treated Wastewater Reuse in Drip Irrigation under Different Pressure Conditions
title_short Assessment of Treated Wastewater Reuse in Drip Irrigation under Different Pressure Conditions
title_full Assessment of Treated Wastewater Reuse in Drip Irrigation under Different Pressure Conditions
title_fullStr Assessment of Treated Wastewater Reuse in Drip Irrigation under Different Pressure Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Treated Wastewater Reuse in Drip Irrigation under Different Pressure Conditions
title_sort assessment of treated wastewater reuse in drip irrigation under different pressure conditions
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2021-04-01
description This study aims to investigate the influence of treated wastewater (TWW) on the hydraulic performance of drip irrigation emitters. A field experiment was conducted in order to test two types of online emitters, a low pressure (LP) and a standard pressure (SP), at different working pressures (0.25 bar, 0.50 bar, and 1.00 bar) using TWW. The emitters were initially evaluated in the laboratory and the field for the discharge exponent (<i>X</i>), discharge coefficient (<i>Kd</i>), average emitter discharge (<i>Q<sub>avg</sub></i>), coefficient of variation (<i>CV</i>), distribution uniformity (<i>DU</i>), the mean discharge ratio (<i>Dra</i>), and the main degree of clogging (<i>DC</i>). The main effect of the emitters on the hydraulic parameters of irrigation performance was not significant, while the operational pressure and operational time of irrigation had a significant effect. For the LP emitter, the average emitter discharge was 7.6, 7.7, and 7.8 Lh<sup>−1</sup> at 0.25, 0.50, and 1.00 bar, respectively. For the SP emitter, the average emitter discharge was 7.6, 7.8, and 7.8 Lh<sup>−1</sup> at 0.25, 0.50, and 1.00 bar, respectively. The <i>EU</i> values for the LP and SP emitters varied from low to moderate at 0.25 bar, as the EU values at 0.50 and 1.00 bar were considered high for both emitter types.
topic drip irrigation
treated wastewater
clogging emitters
compensated emitters
emitter characteristics
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/8/1033
work_keys_str_mv AT najikalmefleh assessmentoftreatedwastewaterreuseindripirrigationunderdifferentpressureconditions
AT samertalozi assessmentoftreatedwastewaterreuseindripirrigationunderdifferentpressureconditions
AT khalidabunasir assessmentoftreatedwastewaterreuseindripirrigationunderdifferentpressureconditions
_version_ 1721532137085075456