Performance of identical rockbolts tested on four dynamic testing rigs employing the direct impact method

Impact drop tests are routinely used to examine the dynamic performance of rockbolts. Numerous impact tests have been carried out in the past decades on independently designed, constructed and operated testing rigs. Each laboratory has developed testing procedures; thus, the results are often report...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charlie C. Li, John Hadjigeorgiou, Peter Mikula, Greig Knox, Bradley Darlington, Renée Royer, Andrzej Pytlik, Michael Hosp
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-08-01
Series:Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775521000160
id doaj-0b16ce8d691a4f94855f8fa04b4bd592
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0b16ce8d691a4f94855f8fa04b4bd5922021-07-13T04:08:54ZengElsevierJournal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering1674-77552021-08-01134745754Performance of identical rockbolts tested on four dynamic testing rigs employing the direct impact methodCharlie C. Li0John Hadjigeorgiou1Peter Mikula2Greig Knox3Bradley Darlington4Renée Royer5Andrzej Pytlik6Michael Hosp7Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway; Corresponding author.University of Toronto, Toronto, CanadaMikula Geotechnics Pty. Ltd., Kalgoorlie, AustraliaNew Concept Mining, Johannesburg, South AfricaSandvik Mining & Rock Technology, Heatherbrae, AustraliaCanmetMINING, Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, CanadaCentral Mining Institute, Katowice, PolandMinova, Innovation and Development Ground Support, Feistritz, AustriaImpact drop tests are routinely used to examine the dynamic performance of rockbolts. Numerous impact tests have been carried out in the past decades on independently designed, constructed and operated testing rigs. Each laboratory has developed testing procedures; thus, the results are often reported in different ways by various laboratories. The inconsistency in testing procedures and reporting formats presents a challenge when comparing results from different laboratories. A series of impact tests of identical rockbolts was carried out using the direct impact method (i.e. the mass free-fall method) on the rigs in four laboratories in different countries. The purpose of these tests was to investigate the level of consistency in the results from the four rigs. Each rig demonstrated a high level of repeatability, but differences existed between the various rigs. The differences would suggest that there is noticeable equipment-dependent bias when test results obtained from different laboratories are compared. It was also observed that the energy dissipated for the plastic displacement of the bolt was smaller than the impact energy in the tests. The average impact load (AIL) and the ultimate plastic displacement (D) of the bolt describe the ultimate dynamic performance of the bolt. In the case where the bolt does not rupture, the specific plastic energy (SPE) is an appropriate parameter in describing the impact performance of the bolt. Two other relevant parameters are the first peak load (FPL) and the initial stiffness (K) of the bolt sample. The information from this test series will guide the formulation of standardised testing procedures for dynamic impact tests of rockbolts.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775521000160Dynamic testDrop testImpact testRockboltRock reinforcementGround support
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Charlie C. Li
John Hadjigeorgiou
Peter Mikula
Greig Knox
Bradley Darlington
Renée Royer
Andrzej Pytlik
Michael Hosp
spellingShingle Charlie C. Li
John Hadjigeorgiou
Peter Mikula
Greig Knox
Bradley Darlington
Renée Royer
Andrzej Pytlik
Michael Hosp
Performance of identical rockbolts tested on four dynamic testing rigs employing the direct impact method
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Dynamic test
Drop test
Impact test
Rockbolt
Rock reinforcement
Ground support
author_facet Charlie C. Li
John Hadjigeorgiou
Peter Mikula
Greig Knox
Bradley Darlington
Renée Royer
Andrzej Pytlik
Michael Hosp
author_sort Charlie C. Li
title Performance of identical rockbolts tested on four dynamic testing rigs employing the direct impact method
title_short Performance of identical rockbolts tested on four dynamic testing rigs employing the direct impact method
title_full Performance of identical rockbolts tested on four dynamic testing rigs employing the direct impact method
title_fullStr Performance of identical rockbolts tested on four dynamic testing rigs employing the direct impact method
title_full_unstemmed Performance of identical rockbolts tested on four dynamic testing rigs employing the direct impact method
title_sort performance of identical rockbolts tested on four dynamic testing rigs employing the direct impact method
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
issn 1674-7755
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Impact drop tests are routinely used to examine the dynamic performance of rockbolts. Numerous impact tests have been carried out in the past decades on independently designed, constructed and operated testing rigs. Each laboratory has developed testing procedures; thus, the results are often reported in different ways by various laboratories. The inconsistency in testing procedures and reporting formats presents a challenge when comparing results from different laboratories. A series of impact tests of identical rockbolts was carried out using the direct impact method (i.e. the mass free-fall method) on the rigs in four laboratories in different countries. The purpose of these tests was to investigate the level of consistency in the results from the four rigs. Each rig demonstrated a high level of repeatability, but differences existed between the various rigs. The differences would suggest that there is noticeable equipment-dependent bias when test results obtained from different laboratories are compared. It was also observed that the energy dissipated for the plastic displacement of the bolt was smaller than the impact energy in the tests. The average impact load (AIL) and the ultimate plastic displacement (D) of the bolt describe the ultimate dynamic performance of the bolt. In the case where the bolt does not rupture, the specific plastic energy (SPE) is an appropriate parameter in describing the impact performance of the bolt. Two other relevant parameters are the first peak load (FPL) and the initial stiffness (K) of the bolt sample. The information from this test series will guide the formulation of standardised testing procedures for dynamic impact tests of rockbolts.
topic Dynamic test
Drop test
Impact test
Rockbolt
Rock reinforcement
Ground support
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674775521000160
work_keys_str_mv AT charliecli performanceofidenticalrockboltstestedonfourdynamictestingrigsemployingthedirectimpactmethod
AT johnhadjigeorgiou performanceofidenticalrockboltstestedonfourdynamictestingrigsemployingthedirectimpactmethod
AT petermikula performanceofidenticalrockboltstestedonfourdynamictestingrigsemployingthedirectimpactmethod
AT greigknox performanceofidenticalrockboltstestedonfourdynamictestingrigsemployingthedirectimpactmethod
AT bradleydarlington performanceofidenticalrockboltstestedonfourdynamictestingrigsemployingthedirectimpactmethod
AT reneeroyer performanceofidenticalrockboltstestedonfourdynamictestingrigsemployingthedirectimpactmethod
AT andrzejpytlik performanceofidenticalrockboltstestedonfourdynamictestingrigsemployingthedirectimpactmethod
AT michaelhosp performanceofidenticalrockboltstestedonfourdynamictestingrigsemployingthedirectimpactmethod
_version_ 1721306313568288768