Policies and programs to facilitate access to targeted cancer therapies in Thailand.

<h4>Background</h4>Increasing access to clinically beneficial targeted cancer medicines is a challenge in every country due to their high cost. We describe the interplay of innovative policies and programs involving multiple stakeholders to facilitate access to these medicines in Thailan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rosarin Sruamsiri, Dennis Ross-Degnan, Christine Y Lu, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk, Anita K Wagner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119945
id doaj-0b0e4955693c4bdb838e62552de40c90
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0b0e4955693c4bdb838e62552de40c902021-03-04T08:28:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01103e011994510.1371/journal.pone.0119945Policies and programs to facilitate access to targeted cancer therapies in Thailand.Rosarin SruamsiriDennis Ross-DegnanChristine Y LuNathorn ChaiyakunaprukAnita K Wagner<h4>Background</h4>Increasing access to clinically beneficial targeted cancer medicines is a challenge in every country due to their high cost. We describe the interplay of innovative policies and programs involving multiple stakeholders to facilitate access to these medicines in Thailand, as well as the utilization of selected targeted therapies over time.<h4>Methods</h4>We selected two medicines on the 2013 Thai national list of essential medicines (NLEM) [letrozole and imatinib] and three unlisted medicines for the same indications [trastuzumab, nilotinib and dasatinib]. We created timelines of access policies and programs for these products based on scientific and grey literature. Using IMS Health sales data, we described the trajectories of sales volumes of the study medicines between January 2001 and December 2012. We compared estimated average numbers of patients treated before and after the implementation of policies and programs for each product.<h4>Results</h4>Different stakeholders implemented multiple interventions to increase access to the study medicines for different patient populations. During 2007-2009, the Thai Government created a special NLEM category with different coverage requirements for payers and issued compulsory licenses; payers negotiated prices with manufacturers and engaged in pooled procurement; pharmaceutical companies expanded patient assistance programs and lowered prices in different ways. Compared to before the interventions, estimated numbers of patients treated with each medicine increased significantly afterwards: for letrozole from 645 (95% CI 366-923) to 3683 (95% CI 2,748-4,618); for imatinib from 103 (95% CI 72-174) to 350 (95% CI 307-398); and for trastuzumab from 68 (95% CI 45-118) to 412 (95% CI 344-563).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Government, payers, and manufacturers implemented multi-pronged approaches to facilitate access to targeted cancer therapies for the Thai population, which differed by medicine. Routine monitoring is needed to assess clinical and economic impacts of these strategies in the health system.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119945
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rosarin Sruamsiri
Dennis Ross-Degnan
Christine Y Lu
Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
Anita K Wagner
spellingShingle Rosarin Sruamsiri
Dennis Ross-Degnan
Christine Y Lu
Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
Anita K Wagner
Policies and programs to facilitate access to targeted cancer therapies in Thailand.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Rosarin Sruamsiri
Dennis Ross-Degnan
Christine Y Lu
Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
Anita K Wagner
author_sort Rosarin Sruamsiri
title Policies and programs to facilitate access to targeted cancer therapies in Thailand.
title_short Policies and programs to facilitate access to targeted cancer therapies in Thailand.
title_full Policies and programs to facilitate access to targeted cancer therapies in Thailand.
title_fullStr Policies and programs to facilitate access to targeted cancer therapies in Thailand.
title_full_unstemmed Policies and programs to facilitate access to targeted cancer therapies in Thailand.
title_sort policies and programs to facilitate access to targeted cancer therapies in thailand.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description <h4>Background</h4>Increasing access to clinically beneficial targeted cancer medicines is a challenge in every country due to their high cost. We describe the interplay of innovative policies and programs involving multiple stakeholders to facilitate access to these medicines in Thailand, as well as the utilization of selected targeted therapies over time.<h4>Methods</h4>We selected two medicines on the 2013 Thai national list of essential medicines (NLEM) [letrozole and imatinib] and three unlisted medicines for the same indications [trastuzumab, nilotinib and dasatinib]. We created timelines of access policies and programs for these products based on scientific and grey literature. Using IMS Health sales data, we described the trajectories of sales volumes of the study medicines between January 2001 and December 2012. We compared estimated average numbers of patients treated before and after the implementation of policies and programs for each product.<h4>Results</h4>Different stakeholders implemented multiple interventions to increase access to the study medicines for different patient populations. During 2007-2009, the Thai Government created a special NLEM category with different coverage requirements for payers and issued compulsory licenses; payers negotiated prices with manufacturers and engaged in pooled procurement; pharmaceutical companies expanded patient assistance programs and lowered prices in different ways. Compared to before the interventions, estimated numbers of patients treated with each medicine increased significantly afterwards: for letrozole from 645 (95% CI 366-923) to 3683 (95% CI 2,748-4,618); for imatinib from 103 (95% CI 72-174) to 350 (95% CI 307-398); and for trastuzumab from 68 (95% CI 45-118) to 412 (95% CI 344-563).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Government, payers, and manufacturers implemented multi-pronged approaches to facilitate access to targeted cancer therapies for the Thai population, which differed by medicine. Routine monitoring is needed to assess clinical and economic impacts of these strategies in the health system.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119945
work_keys_str_mv AT rosarinsruamsiri policiesandprogramstofacilitateaccesstotargetedcancertherapiesinthailand
AT dennisrossdegnan policiesandprogramstofacilitateaccesstotargetedcancertherapiesinthailand
AT christineylu policiesandprogramstofacilitateaccesstotargetedcancertherapiesinthailand
AT nathornchaiyakunapruk policiesandprogramstofacilitateaccesstotargetedcancertherapiesinthailand
AT anitakwagner policiesandprogramstofacilitateaccesstotargetedcancertherapiesinthailand
_version_ 1714807868056666112