Conducting Systematic Outcome Assessment in Private Addictions Treatment Settings
Systematic outcome assessment is central to ascertaining the impact of treatment services and to informing future treatment initiatives. This project was designed to be conducted within the clinical operations of 4 private addictions treatment centers. A structured interview was used to assess patie...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2017-07-01
|
Series: | Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/1178221817719239 |
id |
doaj-0b0c79add8d3492cadfc6d5820110c4b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0b0c79add8d3492cadfc6d5820110c4b2021-04-02T12:52:06ZengSAGE PublishingSubstance Abuse: Research and Treatment1178-22182017-07-011110.1177/1178221817719239Conducting Systematic Outcome Assessment in Private Addictions Treatment SettingsGerard J Connors0Stephen A Maisto1Clare E Campbell2Brenda To3David Sack4Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USADepartment of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USADepartment of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USAElements Behavioral Health, Long Beach, CA, USAElements Behavioral Health, Long Beach, CA, USASystematic outcome assessment is central to ascertaining the impact of treatment services and to informing future treatment initiatives. This project was designed to be conducted within the clinical operations of 4 private addictions treatment centers. A structured interview was used to assess patients’ alcohol and other drug use and related variables (on treatment entry and at 1, 3, and 6 months following treatment discharge). The primary outcomes were percentage of days abstinent (PDA) from alcohol and drugs, PDA from alcohol, and PDA from other drugs. Collateral reports during follow-up also were gathered. A total of 280 patients (56% men) across the 4 programs participated. Percentage of days abstinent for each outcome increased significantly from baseline to the 1-month follow-up assessment, and this change was maintained at the 3- and 6-month follow-up assessments. Collateral reports mirrored the patient follow-up reports. Secondary outcomes of patient ratings of urges/cravings, depression, anxiety, and general life functioning all indicated significant improvement from baseline over the course of the follow-up. The results suggest the feasibility of conducting systematic outcome assessment in freestanding private addictions treatment environments.https://doi.org/10.1177/1178221817719239 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gerard J Connors Stephen A Maisto Clare E Campbell Brenda To David Sack |
spellingShingle |
Gerard J Connors Stephen A Maisto Clare E Campbell Brenda To David Sack Conducting Systematic Outcome Assessment in Private Addictions Treatment Settings Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment |
author_facet |
Gerard J Connors Stephen A Maisto Clare E Campbell Brenda To David Sack |
author_sort |
Gerard J Connors |
title |
Conducting Systematic Outcome Assessment in Private Addictions Treatment Settings |
title_short |
Conducting Systematic Outcome Assessment in Private Addictions Treatment Settings |
title_full |
Conducting Systematic Outcome Assessment in Private Addictions Treatment Settings |
title_fullStr |
Conducting Systematic Outcome Assessment in Private Addictions Treatment Settings |
title_full_unstemmed |
Conducting Systematic Outcome Assessment in Private Addictions Treatment Settings |
title_sort |
conducting systematic outcome assessment in private addictions treatment settings |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment |
issn |
1178-2218 |
publishDate |
2017-07-01 |
description |
Systematic outcome assessment is central to ascertaining the impact of treatment services and to informing future treatment initiatives. This project was designed to be conducted within the clinical operations of 4 private addictions treatment centers. A structured interview was used to assess patients’ alcohol and other drug use and related variables (on treatment entry and at 1, 3, and 6 months following treatment discharge). The primary outcomes were percentage of days abstinent (PDA) from alcohol and drugs, PDA from alcohol, and PDA from other drugs. Collateral reports during follow-up also were gathered. A total of 280 patients (56% men) across the 4 programs participated. Percentage of days abstinent for each outcome increased significantly from baseline to the 1-month follow-up assessment, and this change was maintained at the 3- and 6-month follow-up assessments. Collateral reports mirrored the patient follow-up reports. Secondary outcomes of patient ratings of urges/cravings, depression, anxiety, and general life functioning all indicated significant improvement from baseline over the course of the follow-up. The results suggest the feasibility of conducting systematic outcome assessment in freestanding private addictions treatment environments. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/1178221817719239 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gerardjconnors conductingsystematicoutcomeassessmentinprivateaddictionstreatmentsettings AT stephenamaisto conductingsystematicoutcomeassessmentinprivateaddictionstreatmentsettings AT clareecampbell conductingsystematicoutcomeassessmentinprivateaddictionstreatmentsettings AT brendato conductingsystematicoutcomeassessmentinprivateaddictionstreatmentsettings AT davidsack conductingsystematicoutcomeassessmentinprivateaddictionstreatmentsettings |
_version_ |
1721567269924896768 |