Conducting Systematic Outcome Assessment in Private Addictions Treatment Settings

Systematic outcome assessment is central to ascertaining the impact of treatment services and to informing future treatment initiatives. This project was designed to be conducted within the clinical operations of 4 private addictions treatment centers. A structured interview was used to assess patie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gerard J Connors, Stephen A Maisto, Clare E Campbell, Brenda To, David Sack
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-07-01
Series:Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1178221817719239
id doaj-0b0c79add8d3492cadfc6d5820110c4b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0b0c79add8d3492cadfc6d5820110c4b2021-04-02T12:52:06ZengSAGE PublishingSubstance Abuse: Research and Treatment1178-22182017-07-011110.1177/1178221817719239Conducting Systematic Outcome Assessment in Private Addictions Treatment SettingsGerard J Connors0Stephen A Maisto1Clare E Campbell2Brenda To3David Sack4Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USADepartment of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USADepartment of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USAElements Behavioral Health, Long Beach, CA, USAElements Behavioral Health, Long Beach, CA, USASystematic outcome assessment is central to ascertaining the impact of treatment services and to informing future treatment initiatives. This project was designed to be conducted within the clinical operations of 4 private addictions treatment centers. A structured interview was used to assess patients’ alcohol and other drug use and related variables (on treatment entry and at 1, 3, and 6 months following treatment discharge). The primary outcomes were percentage of days abstinent (PDA) from alcohol and drugs, PDA from alcohol, and PDA from other drugs. Collateral reports during follow-up also were gathered. A total of 280 patients (56% men) across the 4 programs participated. Percentage of days abstinent for each outcome increased significantly from baseline to the 1-month follow-up assessment, and this change was maintained at the 3- and 6-month follow-up assessments. Collateral reports mirrored the patient follow-up reports. Secondary outcomes of patient ratings of urges/cravings, depression, anxiety, and general life functioning all indicated significant improvement from baseline over the course of the follow-up. The results suggest the feasibility of conducting systematic outcome assessment in freestanding private addictions treatment environments.https://doi.org/10.1177/1178221817719239
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gerard J Connors
Stephen A Maisto
Clare E Campbell
Brenda To
David Sack
spellingShingle Gerard J Connors
Stephen A Maisto
Clare E Campbell
Brenda To
David Sack
Conducting Systematic Outcome Assessment in Private Addictions Treatment Settings
Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment
author_facet Gerard J Connors
Stephen A Maisto
Clare E Campbell
Brenda To
David Sack
author_sort Gerard J Connors
title Conducting Systematic Outcome Assessment in Private Addictions Treatment Settings
title_short Conducting Systematic Outcome Assessment in Private Addictions Treatment Settings
title_full Conducting Systematic Outcome Assessment in Private Addictions Treatment Settings
title_fullStr Conducting Systematic Outcome Assessment in Private Addictions Treatment Settings
title_full_unstemmed Conducting Systematic Outcome Assessment in Private Addictions Treatment Settings
title_sort conducting systematic outcome assessment in private addictions treatment settings
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Substance Abuse: Research and Treatment
issn 1178-2218
publishDate 2017-07-01
description Systematic outcome assessment is central to ascertaining the impact of treatment services and to informing future treatment initiatives. This project was designed to be conducted within the clinical operations of 4 private addictions treatment centers. A structured interview was used to assess patients’ alcohol and other drug use and related variables (on treatment entry and at 1, 3, and 6 months following treatment discharge). The primary outcomes were percentage of days abstinent (PDA) from alcohol and drugs, PDA from alcohol, and PDA from other drugs. Collateral reports during follow-up also were gathered. A total of 280 patients (56% men) across the 4 programs participated. Percentage of days abstinent for each outcome increased significantly from baseline to the 1-month follow-up assessment, and this change was maintained at the 3- and 6-month follow-up assessments. Collateral reports mirrored the patient follow-up reports. Secondary outcomes of patient ratings of urges/cravings, depression, anxiety, and general life functioning all indicated significant improvement from baseline over the course of the follow-up. The results suggest the feasibility of conducting systematic outcome assessment in freestanding private addictions treatment environments.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1178221817719239
work_keys_str_mv AT gerardjconnors conductingsystematicoutcomeassessmentinprivateaddictionstreatmentsettings
AT stephenamaisto conductingsystematicoutcomeassessmentinprivateaddictionstreatmentsettings
AT clareecampbell conductingsystematicoutcomeassessmentinprivateaddictionstreatmentsettings
AT brendato conductingsystematicoutcomeassessmentinprivateaddictionstreatmentsettings
AT davidsack conductingsystematicoutcomeassessmentinprivateaddictionstreatmentsettings
_version_ 1721567269924896768