OUTLAWING AMNESTY: THE RETURN OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE SCHEMES*

Abstract: This Article responds to an apparent gap in the scholarly literature which fails to merge the fields of human rights law and international criminal law—a step that would resolve the current debate as to whether any amnesty in transitional justice settings is lawful. More specifically, even...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lisa J. Laplante, University of Connecticut-School of Law, Estados Unidos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina 2012-11-01
Series:Espaço Jurídico
Online Access:http://editora.unoesc.edu.br/index.php/espacojuridico/article/view/1759
id doaj-0b0940189b214a84a77a0fd385a83288
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0b0940189b214a84a77a0fd385a832882020-11-24T21:47:22Zeng Universidade do Oeste de Santa CatarinaEspaço Jurídico1519-58992179-79432012-11-0100591161150OUTLAWING AMNESTY: THE RETURN OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE SCHEMES*Lisa J. Laplante, University of Connecticut-School of Law, Estados Unidos0University of Connecticut, School of LawAbstract: This Article responds to an apparent gap in the scholarly literature which fails to merge the fields of human rights law and international criminal law—a step that would resolve the current debate as to whether any amnesty in transitional justice settings is lawful. More specifically, even though both fields are a subset of transitional justice in general, the discipline of international criminal law still supports the theory of “qualified amnesties” in transitional justice schemes, while international human rights law now stands for the proposition that no amnesty is lawful in those settings. This Article brings attention to this new development through a discussion of the Barrios Altos case. This Article seeks to reveal how an international human rights decision can dramatically impact state practice, thus also contributing to a pending question in international human rights law as to whether such jurisprudence is effective in increasing human rights protections. The Article concludes by looking at the implications of this new legal development in regard to amnesties in order to encourage future research regarding the role of criminal justice in transitional justice schemes. Keywords: Amnesty in the Americas. Transitional Justice. Human Rights Violationshttp://editora.unoesc.edu.br/index.php/espacojuridico/article/view/1759
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lisa J. Laplante, University of Connecticut-School of Law, Estados Unidos
spellingShingle Lisa J. Laplante, University of Connecticut-School of Law, Estados Unidos
OUTLAWING AMNESTY: THE RETURN OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE SCHEMES*
Espaço Jurídico
author_facet Lisa J. Laplante, University of Connecticut-School of Law, Estados Unidos
author_sort Lisa J. Laplante, University of Connecticut-School of Law, Estados Unidos
title OUTLAWING AMNESTY: THE RETURN OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE SCHEMES*
title_short OUTLAWING AMNESTY: THE RETURN OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE SCHEMES*
title_full OUTLAWING AMNESTY: THE RETURN OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE SCHEMES*
title_fullStr OUTLAWING AMNESTY: THE RETURN OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE SCHEMES*
title_full_unstemmed OUTLAWING AMNESTY: THE RETURN OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE IN TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE SCHEMES*
title_sort outlawing amnesty: the return of criminal justice in transitional justice schemes*
publisher Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina
series Espaço Jurídico
issn 1519-5899
2179-7943
publishDate 2012-11-01
description Abstract: This Article responds to an apparent gap in the scholarly literature which fails to merge the fields of human rights law and international criminal law—a step that would resolve the current debate as to whether any amnesty in transitional justice settings is lawful. More specifically, even though both fields are a subset of transitional justice in general, the discipline of international criminal law still supports the theory of “qualified amnesties” in transitional justice schemes, while international human rights law now stands for the proposition that no amnesty is lawful in those settings. This Article brings attention to this new development through a discussion of the Barrios Altos case. This Article seeks to reveal how an international human rights decision can dramatically impact state practice, thus also contributing to a pending question in international human rights law as to whether such jurisprudence is effective in increasing human rights protections. The Article concludes by looking at the implications of this new legal development in regard to amnesties in order to encourage future research regarding the role of criminal justice in transitional justice schemes. Keywords: Amnesty in the Americas. Transitional Justice. Human Rights Violations
url http://editora.unoesc.edu.br/index.php/espacojuridico/article/view/1759
work_keys_str_mv AT lisajlaplanteuniversityofconnecticutschooloflawestadosunidos outlawingamnestythereturnofcriminaljusticeintransitionaljusticeschemes
_version_ 1725897491872743424