Analysis of adherence to HIV-positive quality of care indicators and their impact on service quality perceptions in patients: a Spanish cross-sectional study

• Main Authors: A. Gimeno-García, A. Franco-Moreno, C. Montero-Hernández, S. Arponen, E. García-Carrasco, B. Alejos, D. Corps-Fernández, E. Gaspar-García, P. Galindo-Jara, M. García-Navarro, D. Varillas-Delgado
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2020-06-01
• Series: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
• Subjects: HIV; Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; Quality indicators; Health care: patient satisfaction
• Online Access: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12955-020-01441-w

Abstract Background Since the identification of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, there have been significant advances in its diagnosis and treatment, but there have been few contributions to the area of care quality. In 2010, the Spanish AIDS Study Group (GeSIDA) published the document “Health quality indicators of GeSIDA for the care of people infected with HIV/AIDS” in which standards are proposed for the purpose of improving and standardizing the assistance provided to people infected with HIV. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the degree of compliance with these indicators and to analyse whether adherence to the standards improves patient perception of care quality in terms of their satisfaction with the health care they have received. Methods Compliance with GeSIDA indicators was analysed within a cohort of people living with HIV (PLHIV) in a hospital in the Madrid region. To evaluate patient perception, the External Consultation User Satisfaction Questionnaire (SUCE) was used, which is a tool that was previously validated in the Spanish population. Results A total of 334 patients were included. The level of adherence to the indicators was 74.46%. The score on the SUCE questionnaire was 9.04 out of 10 (CI 95%: 8.90–9.19). Of the 47 indicators assessed, only 4 were related to satisfaction with health care. Conclusions The levels of compliance with the indicators and patient satisfaction with health care were high. Adherence to quality indicators showed little relation to patient-reported satisfaction.