Landscape Valuation of Environmental Amenities throughoutthe Application of Direct and Indirect Methods

Landscape design, construction and management should no longer be the result of superficial approaches based exclusively on designers’ and planners’ ideas. This research starts with the assumption that the aesthetic component constitutes an essential attribute for better understanding and evaluating...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luís Loures, Ana Loures, José Nunes, Thomas Panagopoulos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-01-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/1/794
id doaj-0b08633400994858b89ac48fd0fe7abf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0b08633400994858b89ac48fd0fe7abf2020-11-24T22:17:13ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502015-01-017179481010.3390/su7010794su7010794Landscape Valuation of Environmental Amenities throughoutthe Application of Direct and Indirect MethodsLuís Loures0Ana Loures1José Nunes2Thomas Panagopoulos3Centre for Spatial and Organizational Dynamics (CIEO), Ed. 8 Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, PortugalInstituto Politécnico de Portalegre (IPP), Praça do Mun. Apartado 84, 7301-901 Portalegre, PortugalInstituto Politécnico de Portalegre (IPP), Praça do Mun. Apartado 84, 7301-901 Portalegre, PortugalCentre for Spatial and Organizational Dynamics (CIEO), Ed. 8 Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, PortugalLandscape design, construction and management should no longer be the result of superficial approaches based exclusively on designers’ and planners’ ideas. This research starts with the assumption that the aesthetic component constitutes an essential attribute for better understanding and evaluating landscapes. This study analyzes the aesthetic quality and economic valuation of the Lower Guadiana river landscape, through the application of direct and indirect landscape evaluation methods. In order to gauge not only experts’ opinion, it is supported by the application of public participation techniques about the opinion and perceptions of the site visitors/users. The present research considered the analysis of six landscape subunits regarding landscape quality, fragility and visual absorption capacity. The obtained results showed that there are significant differences between the perceptions of the general public and experts’ analysis. Touristic Complexes and Golf Courses had high visual quality, while Agricultural and Production Areas had high visual fragility. Moreover, the performed analysis made clear that the combined use of landscape assessment methods is suited to this type of study, since it enables quantifying the value of existence, management and maintenance of a particular environmental assets and/or services.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/1/794aesthetic analysislower guadianariverscapepublic participationeconomic valuation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Luís Loures
Ana Loures
José Nunes
Thomas Panagopoulos
spellingShingle Luís Loures
Ana Loures
José Nunes
Thomas Panagopoulos
Landscape Valuation of Environmental Amenities throughoutthe Application of Direct and Indirect Methods
Sustainability
aesthetic analysis
lower guadiana
riverscape
public participation
economic valuation
author_facet Luís Loures
Ana Loures
José Nunes
Thomas Panagopoulos
author_sort Luís Loures
title Landscape Valuation of Environmental Amenities throughoutthe Application of Direct and Indirect Methods
title_short Landscape Valuation of Environmental Amenities throughoutthe Application of Direct and Indirect Methods
title_full Landscape Valuation of Environmental Amenities throughoutthe Application of Direct and Indirect Methods
title_fullStr Landscape Valuation of Environmental Amenities throughoutthe Application of Direct and Indirect Methods
title_full_unstemmed Landscape Valuation of Environmental Amenities throughoutthe Application of Direct and Indirect Methods
title_sort landscape valuation of environmental amenities throughoutthe application of direct and indirect methods
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Landscape design, construction and management should no longer be the result of superficial approaches based exclusively on designers’ and planners’ ideas. This research starts with the assumption that the aesthetic component constitutes an essential attribute for better understanding and evaluating landscapes. This study analyzes the aesthetic quality and economic valuation of the Lower Guadiana river landscape, through the application of direct and indirect landscape evaluation methods. In order to gauge not only experts’ opinion, it is supported by the application of public participation techniques about the opinion and perceptions of the site visitors/users. The present research considered the analysis of six landscape subunits regarding landscape quality, fragility and visual absorption capacity. The obtained results showed that there are significant differences between the perceptions of the general public and experts’ analysis. Touristic Complexes and Golf Courses had high visual quality, while Agricultural and Production Areas had high visual fragility. Moreover, the performed analysis made clear that the combined use of landscape assessment methods is suited to this type of study, since it enables quantifying the value of existence, management and maintenance of a particular environmental assets and/or services.
topic aesthetic analysis
lower guadiana
riverscape
public participation
economic valuation
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/1/794
work_keys_str_mv AT luisloures landscapevaluationofenvironmentalamenitiesthroughouttheapplicationofdirectandindirectmethods
AT analoures landscapevaluationofenvironmentalamenitiesthroughouttheapplicationofdirectandindirectmethods
AT josenunes landscapevaluationofenvironmentalamenitiesthroughouttheapplicationofdirectandindirectmethods
AT thomaspanagopoulos landscapevaluationofenvironmentalamenitiesthroughouttheapplicationofdirectandindirectmethods
_version_ 1725785954562605056