Evaluation practices in the field of Food and Nutrition

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to characterize and analyze the different existing methods for the evaluation of food and nutrition programs and services in Brazil, through a systematic review of the literature focused on complete articles published in national indexed journals. We searched...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Max Felipe Vianna GASPARINI, Alessandro BIGONI, Maria Angélica Tavares de MEDEIROS, Juarez Pereira FURTADO
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas
Series:Revista de Nutrição
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-52732017000300391&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-0afc4575cc254d70b008e94669413dbf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0afc4575cc254d70b008e94669413dbf2020-11-25T00:41:08ZengPontifícia Universidade Católica de CampinasRevista de Nutrição1678-986530339140710.1590/1678-98652017000300011S1415-52732017000300391Evaluation practices in the field of Food and NutritionMax Felipe Vianna GASPARINIAlessandro BIGONIMaria Angélica Tavares de MEDEIROSJuarez Pereira FURTADOABSTRACT The objective of this study was to characterize and analyze the different existing methods for the evaluation of food and nutrition programs and services in Brazil, through a systematic review of the literature focused on complete articles published in national indexed journals. We searched the PubMed, MedLine and LILACS databases using the following search terms and Boolean operators: “evaluation and program”; “project”; “intervention”; “servisse”; “actions and nutrition”; “nutritional”. The research was restricted to articles written in Portuguese, English and Spanish and published between 2001 and 2015. Twenty-two studies were selected and the analysis indicates; most were carried out through quantitative approaches and external evaluations based on epidemiological theory; participatory evaluation strategies are still uncommon; Impact assessments and implementation were predominant; there is little diversity in terms of references to the theoretical framework in the field of evaluation of health care programs in the planning and execution of the evaluation processes analyzed. The results of this study indicate the need for a more comprehensive evaluation considering the complexity of the interventions evaluated using the theoretical-methodological apparatus available in the literature to understand the importance of the different perspectives of the agents involved in the evaluation processes.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-52732017000300391&lng=en&tlng=enAvaliação de programas e projetos de SaúdeNutrição em saúde públicaPolítica nutricional.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Max Felipe Vianna GASPARINI
Alessandro BIGONI
Maria Angélica Tavares de MEDEIROS
Juarez Pereira FURTADO
spellingShingle Max Felipe Vianna GASPARINI
Alessandro BIGONI
Maria Angélica Tavares de MEDEIROS
Juarez Pereira FURTADO
Evaluation practices in the field of Food and Nutrition
Revista de Nutrição
Avaliação de programas e projetos de Saúde
Nutrição em saúde pública
Política nutricional.
author_facet Max Felipe Vianna GASPARINI
Alessandro BIGONI
Maria Angélica Tavares de MEDEIROS
Juarez Pereira FURTADO
author_sort Max Felipe Vianna GASPARINI
title Evaluation practices in the field of Food and Nutrition
title_short Evaluation practices in the field of Food and Nutrition
title_full Evaluation practices in the field of Food and Nutrition
title_fullStr Evaluation practices in the field of Food and Nutrition
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation practices in the field of Food and Nutrition
title_sort evaluation practices in the field of food and nutrition
publisher Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas
series Revista de Nutrição
issn 1678-9865
description ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to characterize and analyze the different existing methods for the evaluation of food and nutrition programs and services in Brazil, through a systematic review of the literature focused on complete articles published in national indexed journals. We searched the PubMed, MedLine and LILACS databases using the following search terms and Boolean operators: “evaluation and program”; “project”; “intervention”; “servisse”; “actions and nutrition”; “nutritional”. The research was restricted to articles written in Portuguese, English and Spanish and published between 2001 and 2015. Twenty-two studies were selected and the analysis indicates; most were carried out through quantitative approaches and external evaluations based on epidemiological theory; participatory evaluation strategies are still uncommon; Impact assessments and implementation were predominant; there is little diversity in terms of references to the theoretical framework in the field of evaluation of health care programs in the planning and execution of the evaluation processes analyzed. The results of this study indicate the need for a more comprehensive evaluation considering the complexity of the interventions evaluated using the theoretical-methodological apparatus available in the literature to understand the importance of the different perspectives of the agents involved in the evaluation processes.
topic Avaliação de programas e projetos de Saúde
Nutrição em saúde pública
Política nutricional.
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-52732017000300391&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT maxfelipeviannagasparini evaluationpracticesinthefieldoffoodandnutrition
AT alessandrobigoni evaluationpracticesinthefieldoffoodandnutrition
AT mariaangelicatavaresdemedeiros evaluationpracticesinthefieldoffoodandnutrition
AT juarezpereirafurtado evaluationpracticesinthefieldoffoodandnutrition
_version_ 1725287102743052288