Deconstruction in Architecture – Continuous Translation through an Open Project
Jacques Derrida developed deconstruction as a way of thinking which constantly examines the nature and possibilities of meaning. The paper analyses spatial-economic, cultural and social context in which deconstructive discourse was translated into architectural discourse. Translation between these t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Singidunum University. Faculty of Media and Communications
2017-04-01
|
Series: | AM: Art + Media |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://fmkjournals.fmk.edu.rs/index.php/AM/article/view/170 |
id |
doaj-0af81fc6c50c4116bbdd388e2d28377a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0af81fc6c50c4116bbdd388e2d28377a2020-11-24T23:47:20ZengSingidunum University. Faculty of Media and CommunicationsAM: Art + Media2217-96662406-16542017-04-010129910710.25038/am.v0i12.170171Deconstruction in Architecture – Continuous Translation through an Open ProjectJovana Tošić0Information Technology School – ITS Comtrade, BelgradeJacques Derrida developed deconstruction as a way of thinking which constantly examines the nature and possibilities of meaning. The paper analyses spatial-economic, cultural and social context in which deconstructive discourse was translated into architectural discourse. Translation between these two discourses happens vice versa. Deconstructivism emphasizes the formal properties of architecture, like postmodernism, which is the subject of exploration by architects such as Coop Himmelblau, Frank Gehry, Eric Owen Moss, etc. According to some interpretations, the only solution for deconstruction in architectural work is incompleteness, an open project which represents never-ending deconstruction. There are different solutions for open projects, and the article highlights projects by architects mentioned above, which seems to manage to achieve continuous deconstruction in practice. Article received: December 23, 2016; Article accepted: January 18, 2017; Published online: April 20, 2017 Original scholarly paper How to cite this paper: Tošić, Jovana. "Deconstruction in Architecture – Continuous Translation through an Open Project." AM Journal of Art and Media Studies 20 (2017): 99-107. doi: 10.25038/am.v0i12.170http://fmkjournals.fmk.edu.rs/index.php/AM/article/view/170architectural discourse, deconstructive discourse, translation, incompleteness, open project |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jovana Tošić |
spellingShingle |
Jovana Tošić Deconstruction in Architecture – Continuous Translation through an Open Project AM: Art + Media architectural discourse, deconstructive discourse, translation, incompleteness, open project |
author_facet |
Jovana Tošić |
author_sort |
Jovana Tošić |
title |
Deconstruction in Architecture – Continuous Translation through an Open Project |
title_short |
Deconstruction in Architecture – Continuous Translation through an Open Project |
title_full |
Deconstruction in Architecture – Continuous Translation through an Open Project |
title_fullStr |
Deconstruction in Architecture – Continuous Translation through an Open Project |
title_full_unstemmed |
Deconstruction in Architecture – Continuous Translation through an Open Project |
title_sort |
deconstruction in architecture – continuous translation through an open project |
publisher |
Singidunum University. Faculty of Media and Communications |
series |
AM: Art + Media |
issn |
2217-9666 2406-1654 |
publishDate |
2017-04-01 |
description |
Jacques Derrida developed deconstruction as a way of thinking which constantly examines the nature and possibilities of meaning. The paper analyses spatial-economic, cultural and social context in which deconstructive discourse was translated into architectural discourse. Translation between these two discourses happens vice versa. Deconstructivism emphasizes the formal properties of architecture, like postmodernism, which is the subject of exploration by architects such as Coop Himmelblau, Frank Gehry, Eric Owen Moss, etc. According to some interpretations, the only solution for deconstruction in architectural work is incompleteness, an open project which represents never-ending deconstruction. There are different solutions for open projects, and the article highlights projects by architects mentioned above, which seems to manage to achieve continuous deconstruction in practice.
Article received: December 23, 2016; Article accepted: January 18, 2017; Published online: April 20, 2017
Original scholarly paper
How to cite this paper: Tošić, Jovana. "Deconstruction in Architecture – Continuous Translation through an Open Project." AM Journal of Art and Media Studies 20 (2017): 99-107. doi: 10.25038/am.v0i12.170 |
topic |
architectural discourse, deconstructive discourse, translation, incompleteness, open project |
url |
http://fmkjournals.fmk.edu.rs/index.php/AM/article/view/170 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jovanatosic deconstructioninarchitecturecontinuoustranslationthroughanopenproject |
_version_ |
1725490282486562816 |