Air sampling procedures to evaluate microbial contamination: a comparison between active and passive methods in operating theatres
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Since air can play a central role as a reservoir for microorganisms, in controlled environments such as operating theatres regular microbial monitoring is useful to measure air quality and identify critical situations. The aim of thi...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2012-08-01
|
Series: | BMC Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/594 |
id |
doaj-0af2ade1dcbd447d94ab92073633215f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0af2ade1dcbd447d94ab92073633215f2020-11-25T00:33:42ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582012-08-0112159410.1186/1471-2458-12-594Air sampling procedures to evaluate microbial contamination: a comparison between active and passive methods in operating theatresNapoli ChristianMarcotrigiano VincenzoMontagna Maria<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Since air can play a central role as a reservoir for microorganisms, in controlled environments such as operating theatres regular microbial monitoring is useful to measure air quality and identify critical situations. The aim of this study is to assess microbial contamination levels in operating theatres using both an active and a passive sampling method and then to assess if there is a correlation between the results of the two different sampling methods.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The study was performed in 32 turbulent air flow operating theatres of a University Hospital in Southern Italy. Active sampling was carried out using the Surface Air System and passive sampling with settle plates, in accordance with ISO 14698. The Total Viable Count (TVC) was evaluated <it>at rest</it> (in the morning before the beginning of surgical activity) and <it>in operational</it> (during surgery).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The mean TVC <it>at rest</it> was 12.4 CFU/m<sup>3</sup> and 722.5 CFU/m<sup>2</sup>/h for active and passive samplings respectively. The mean <it>in operational</it> TVC was 93.8 CFU/m<sup>3</sup> (SD = 52.69; range = 22-256) and 10496.5 CFU/m<sup>2</sup>/h (SD = 7460.5; range = 1415.5-25479.7) for active and passive samplings respectively. Statistical analysis confirmed that the two methods correlate in a comparable way with the quality of air.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>It is possible to conclude that both methods can be used for general monitoring of air contamination, such as routine surveillance programs. However, the choice must be made between one or the other to obtain specific information.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/594BioaerosolAir samplingOperating theatresSurveillance |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Napoli Christian Marcotrigiano Vincenzo Montagna Maria |
spellingShingle |
Napoli Christian Marcotrigiano Vincenzo Montagna Maria Air sampling procedures to evaluate microbial contamination: a comparison between active and passive methods in operating theatres BMC Public Health Bioaerosol Air sampling Operating theatres Surveillance |
author_facet |
Napoli Christian Marcotrigiano Vincenzo Montagna Maria |
author_sort |
Napoli Christian |
title |
Air sampling procedures to evaluate microbial contamination: a comparison between active and passive methods in operating theatres |
title_short |
Air sampling procedures to evaluate microbial contamination: a comparison between active and passive methods in operating theatres |
title_full |
Air sampling procedures to evaluate microbial contamination: a comparison between active and passive methods in operating theatres |
title_fullStr |
Air sampling procedures to evaluate microbial contamination: a comparison between active and passive methods in operating theatres |
title_full_unstemmed |
Air sampling procedures to evaluate microbial contamination: a comparison between active and passive methods in operating theatres |
title_sort |
air sampling procedures to evaluate microbial contamination: a comparison between active and passive methods in operating theatres |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Public Health |
issn |
1471-2458 |
publishDate |
2012-08-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Since air can play a central role as a reservoir for microorganisms, in controlled environments such as operating theatres regular microbial monitoring is useful to measure air quality and identify critical situations. The aim of this study is to assess microbial contamination levels in operating theatres using both an active and a passive sampling method and then to assess if there is a correlation between the results of the two different sampling methods.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The study was performed in 32 turbulent air flow operating theatres of a University Hospital in Southern Italy. Active sampling was carried out using the Surface Air System and passive sampling with settle plates, in accordance with ISO 14698. The Total Viable Count (TVC) was evaluated <it>at rest</it> (in the morning before the beginning of surgical activity) and <it>in operational</it> (during surgery).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The mean TVC <it>at rest</it> was 12.4 CFU/m<sup>3</sup> and 722.5 CFU/m<sup>2</sup>/h for active and passive samplings respectively. The mean <it>in operational</it> TVC was 93.8 CFU/m<sup>3</sup> (SD = 52.69; range = 22-256) and 10496.5 CFU/m<sup>2</sup>/h (SD = 7460.5; range = 1415.5-25479.7) for active and passive samplings respectively. Statistical analysis confirmed that the two methods correlate in a comparable way with the quality of air.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>It is possible to conclude that both methods can be used for general monitoring of air contamination, such as routine surveillance programs. However, the choice must be made between one or the other to obtain specific information.</p> |
topic |
Bioaerosol Air sampling Operating theatres Surveillance |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/594 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT napolichristian airsamplingprocedurestoevaluatemicrobialcontaminationacomparisonbetweenactiveandpassivemethodsinoperatingtheatres AT marcotrigianovincenzo airsamplingprocedurestoevaluatemicrobialcontaminationacomparisonbetweenactiveandpassivemethodsinoperatingtheatres AT montagnamaria airsamplingprocedurestoevaluatemicrobialcontaminationacomparisonbetweenactiveandpassivemethodsinoperatingtheatres |
_version_ |
1725315322473349120 |