Air sampling procedures to evaluate microbial contamination: a comparison between active and passive methods in operating theatres

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Since air can play a central role as a reservoir for microorganisms, in controlled environments such as operating theatres regular microbial monitoring is useful to measure air quality and identify critical situations. The aim of thi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Napoli Christian, Marcotrigiano Vincenzo, Montagna Maria
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-08-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/594
id doaj-0af2ade1dcbd447d94ab92073633215f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0af2ade1dcbd447d94ab92073633215f2020-11-25T00:33:42ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582012-08-0112159410.1186/1471-2458-12-594Air sampling procedures to evaluate microbial contamination: a comparison between active and passive methods in operating theatresNapoli ChristianMarcotrigiano VincenzoMontagna Maria<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Since air can play a central role as a reservoir for microorganisms, in controlled environments such as operating theatres regular microbial monitoring is useful to measure air quality and identify critical situations. The aim of this study is to assess microbial contamination levels in operating theatres using both an active and a passive sampling method and then to assess if there is a correlation between the results of the two different sampling methods.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The study was performed in 32 turbulent air flow operating theatres of a University Hospital in Southern Italy. Active sampling was carried out using the Surface Air System and passive sampling with settle plates, in accordance with ISO 14698. The Total Viable Count (TVC) was evaluated <it>at rest</it> (in the morning before the beginning of surgical activity) and <it>in operational</it> (during surgery).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The mean TVC <it>at rest</it> was 12.4 CFU/m<sup>3</sup> and 722.5 CFU/m<sup>2</sup>/h for active and passive samplings respectively. The mean <it>in operational</it> TVC was 93.8 CFU/m<sup>3</sup> (SD = 52.69; range = 22-256) and 10496.5 CFU/m<sup>2</sup>/h (SD = 7460.5; range = 1415.5-25479.7) for active and passive samplings respectively. Statistical analysis confirmed that the two methods correlate in a comparable way with the quality of air.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>It is possible to conclude that both methods can be used for general monitoring of air contamination, such as routine surveillance programs. However, the choice must be made between one or the other to obtain specific information.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/594BioaerosolAir samplingOperating theatresSurveillance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Napoli Christian
Marcotrigiano Vincenzo
Montagna Maria
spellingShingle Napoli Christian
Marcotrigiano Vincenzo
Montagna Maria
Air sampling procedures to evaluate microbial contamination: a comparison between active and passive methods in operating theatres
BMC Public Health
Bioaerosol
Air sampling
Operating theatres
Surveillance
author_facet Napoli Christian
Marcotrigiano Vincenzo
Montagna Maria
author_sort Napoli Christian
title Air sampling procedures to evaluate microbial contamination: a comparison between active and passive methods in operating theatres
title_short Air sampling procedures to evaluate microbial contamination: a comparison between active and passive methods in operating theatres
title_full Air sampling procedures to evaluate microbial contamination: a comparison between active and passive methods in operating theatres
title_fullStr Air sampling procedures to evaluate microbial contamination: a comparison between active and passive methods in operating theatres
title_full_unstemmed Air sampling procedures to evaluate microbial contamination: a comparison between active and passive methods in operating theatres
title_sort air sampling procedures to evaluate microbial contamination: a comparison between active and passive methods in operating theatres
publisher BMC
series BMC Public Health
issn 1471-2458
publishDate 2012-08-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Since air can play a central role as a reservoir for microorganisms, in controlled environments such as operating theatres regular microbial monitoring is useful to measure air quality and identify critical situations. The aim of this study is to assess microbial contamination levels in operating theatres using both an active and a passive sampling method and then to assess if there is a correlation between the results of the two different sampling methods.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The study was performed in 32 turbulent air flow operating theatres of a University Hospital in Southern Italy. Active sampling was carried out using the Surface Air System and passive sampling with settle plates, in accordance with ISO 14698. The Total Viable Count (TVC) was evaluated <it>at rest</it> (in the morning before the beginning of surgical activity) and <it>in operational</it> (during surgery).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The mean TVC <it>at rest</it> was 12.4 CFU/m<sup>3</sup> and 722.5 CFU/m<sup>2</sup>/h for active and passive samplings respectively. The mean <it>in operational</it> TVC was 93.8 CFU/m<sup>3</sup> (SD = 52.69; range = 22-256) and 10496.5 CFU/m<sup>2</sup>/h (SD = 7460.5; range = 1415.5-25479.7) for active and passive samplings respectively. Statistical analysis confirmed that the two methods correlate in a comparable way with the quality of air.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>It is possible to conclude that both methods can be used for general monitoring of air contamination, such as routine surveillance programs. However, the choice must be made between one or the other to obtain specific information.</p>
topic Bioaerosol
Air sampling
Operating theatres
Surveillance
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/594
work_keys_str_mv AT napolichristian airsamplingprocedurestoevaluatemicrobialcontaminationacomparisonbetweenactiveandpassivemethodsinoperatingtheatres
AT marcotrigianovincenzo airsamplingprocedurestoevaluatemicrobialcontaminationacomparisonbetweenactiveandpassivemethodsinoperatingtheatres
AT montagnamaria airsamplingprocedurestoevaluatemicrobialcontaminationacomparisonbetweenactiveandpassivemethodsinoperatingtheatres
_version_ 1725315322473349120