Early positivity signals changes in an abstract linguistic pattern.

The extraction of abstract structures from speech (or from gestures in the case of sign languages) has been claimed to be a fundamental mechanism for language acquisition. In the present study we registered the neural responses that are triggered when a violation of an abstract, token-independent ru...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Júlia Monte-Ordoño, Juan M Toro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5498064?pdf=render
id doaj-0aeb76185fd64a0a91c47643bdecd8e8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0aeb76185fd64a0a91c47643bdecd8e82020-11-24T21:48:14ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01127e018072710.1371/journal.pone.0180727Early positivity signals changes in an abstract linguistic pattern.Júlia Monte-OrdoñoJuan M ToroThe extraction of abstract structures from speech (or from gestures in the case of sign languages) has been claimed to be a fundamental mechanism for language acquisition. In the present study we registered the neural responses that are triggered when a violation of an abstract, token-independent rule is detected. We registered ERPs while presenting participants with trisyllabic CVCVCV nonsense words in an oddball paradigm. Standard stimuli followed an ABB rule (where A and B are different syllables). Importantly, to distinguish neural responses triggered by changes in surface information from responses triggered by changes in the underlying abstract structure, we used two types of deviant stimuli. Phoneme deviants differed from standards only in their phonemes. Rule deviants differed from standards in both their phonemes and their composing rule. We observed a significant positivity as early as 300 ms after the presentation of deviant stimuli that violated the abstract rule (Rule deviants). The amplitude of this neural response was correlated with participants' performance in a behavioral rule learning test. Differences in electrophysiological responses observed between learners and non-learners suggest that individual differences in an abstract rule learning task might be related to how listeners select relevant sources of information.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5498064?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Júlia Monte-Ordoño
Juan M Toro
spellingShingle Júlia Monte-Ordoño
Juan M Toro
Early positivity signals changes in an abstract linguistic pattern.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Júlia Monte-Ordoño
Juan M Toro
author_sort Júlia Monte-Ordoño
title Early positivity signals changes in an abstract linguistic pattern.
title_short Early positivity signals changes in an abstract linguistic pattern.
title_full Early positivity signals changes in an abstract linguistic pattern.
title_fullStr Early positivity signals changes in an abstract linguistic pattern.
title_full_unstemmed Early positivity signals changes in an abstract linguistic pattern.
title_sort early positivity signals changes in an abstract linguistic pattern.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description The extraction of abstract structures from speech (or from gestures in the case of sign languages) has been claimed to be a fundamental mechanism for language acquisition. In the present study we registered the neural responses that are triggered when a violation of an abstract, token-independent rule is detected. We registered ERPs while presenting participants with trisyllabic CVCVCV nonsense words in an oddball paradigm. Standard stimuli followed an ABB rule (where A and B are different syllables). Importantly, to distinguish neural responses triggered by changes in surface information from responses triggered by changes in the underlying abstract structure, we used two types of deviant stimuli. Phoneme deviants differed from standards only in their phonemes. Rule deviants differed from standards in both their phonemes and their composing rule. We observed a significant positivity as early as 300 ms after the presentation of deviant stimuli that violated the abstract rule (Rule deviants). The amplitude of this neural response was correlated with participants' performance in a behavioral rule learning test. Differences in electrophysiological responses observed between learners and non-learners suggest that individual differences in an abstract rule learning task might be related to how listeners select relevant sources of information.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5498064?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT juliamonteordono earlypositivitysignalschangesinanabstractlinguisticpattern
AT juanmtoro earlypositivitysignalschangesinanabstractlinguisticpattern
_version_ 1725893388918587392