Achieving lively, creative and successful university environments

With the advent of the knowledge era, academia has begun to play new roles in society. As a result, requirements for the design of universities may also change. Milieus of lively and flourishing urban life that foster encounters and unforeseen collaborations within academia – as well as between acad...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jan Amcoff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-09-01
Series:Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1838192
id doaj-0ae3d3c5c63440279b8e6eae931af4da
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0ae3d3c5c63440279b8e6eae931af4da2020-12-07T18:06:37ZengTaylor & Francis GroupNordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy2002-03172020-09-016317919210.1080/20020317.2020.18381921838192Achieving lively, creative and successful university environmentsJan Amcoff0Uppsala UniversityWith the advent of the knowledge era, academia has begun to play new roles in society. As a result, requirements for the design of universities may also change. Milieus of lively and flourishing urban life that foster encounters and unforeseen collaborations within academia – as well as between academia and society at large – have been called for. In this research, a GIS analysis of Swedish register data shows that such mixed environments are limited to the university facilities situated within city centres. However, both new and abandoned locations are more mixed than average. Based on a literature review, we argue that university planners need a clear priority ranking of their objectives, as different objectives may call for different kinds of design. Moreover, the review reveals that other environmental qualities have also been ascribed importance to success. In general, the existing literature provides limited guidance to designers, due to a lack of consensus and because the actual effects of specific measures are less researched than stated perceptions. Thus, so far, the contemporary direction in university design has limited expressions in Sweden, has unclear – and potentially conflicting – objectives and is based on insufficient empirical knowledge.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1838192university planninguniversity designuniversity environments
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jan Amcoff
spellingShingle Jan Amcoff
Achieving lively, creative and successful university environments
Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy
university planning
university design
university environments
author_facet Jan Amcoff
author_sort Jan Amcoff
title Achieving lively, creative and successful university environments
title_short Achieving lively, creative and successful university environments
title_full Achieving lively, creative and successful university environments
title_fullStr Achieving lively, creative and successful university environments
title_full_unstemmed Achieving lively, creative and successful university environments
title_sort achieving lively, creative and successful university environments
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy
issn 2002-0317
publishDate 2020-09-01
description With the advent of the knowledge era, academia has begun to play new roles in society. As a result, requirements for the design of universities may also change. Milieus of lively and flourishing urban life that foster encounters and unforeseen collaborations within academia – as well as between academia and society at large – have been called for. In this research, a GIS analysis of Swedish register data shows that such mixed environments are limited to the university facilities situated within city centres. However, both new and abandoned locations are more mixed than average. Based on a literature review, we argue that university planners need a clear priority ranking of their objectives, as different objectives may call for different kinds of design. Moreover, the review reveals that other environmental qualities have also been ascribed importance to success. In general, the existing literature provides limited guidance to designers, due to a lack of consensus and because the actual effects of specific measures are less researched than stated perceptions. Thus, so far, the contemporary direction in university design has limited expressions in Sweden, has unclear – and potentially conflicting – objectives and is based on insufficient empirical knowledge.
topic university planning
university design
university environments
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1838192
work_keys_str_mv AT janamcoff achievinglivelycreativeandsuccessfuluniversityenvironments
_version_ 1724397337299648512