Atmospheric inverse modeling with known physical bounds: an example from trace gas emissions
Many inverse problems in the atmospheric sciences involve parameters with known physical constraints. Examples include nonnegativity (e.g., emissions of some urban air pollutants) or upward limits implied by reaction or solubility constants. However, probabilistic inverse modeling approaches based o...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2014-02-01
|
Series: | Geoscientific Model Development |
Online Access: | http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/7/303/2014/gmd-7-303-2014.pdf |
id |
doaj-0ad7a63bdc544e3ab4134cfeca5e3c40 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0ad7a63bdc544e3ab4134cfeca5e3c402020-11-24T23:59:39ZengCopernicus PublicationsGeoscientific Model Development1991-959X1991-96032014-02-017130331510.5194/gmd-7-303-2014Atmospheric inverse modeling with known physical bounds: an example from trace gas emissionsS. M. Miller0A. M. Michalak1P. J. Levi2Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USADepartment of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA, USADepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USAMany inverse problems in the atmospheric sciences involve parameters with known physical constraints. Examples include nonnegativity (e.g., emissions of some urban air pollutants) or upward limits implied by reaction or solubility constants. However, probabilistic inverse modeling approaches based on Gaussian assumptions cannot incorporate such bounds and thus often produce unrealistic results. The atmospheric literature lacks consensus on the best means to overcome this problem, and existing atmospheric studies rely on a limited number of the possible methods with little examination of the relative merits of each. <br><br> This paper investigates the applicability of several approaches to bounded inverse problems. A common method of data transformations is found to unrealistically skew estimates for the examined example application. The method of Lagrange multipliers and two Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods yield more realistic and accurate results. In general, the examined MCMC approaches produce the most realistic result but can require substantial computational time. Lagrange multipliers offer an appealing option for large, computationally intensive problems when exact uncertainty bounds are less central to the analysis. A synthetic data inversion of US anthropogenic methane emissions illustrates the strengths and weaknesses of each approach.http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/7/303/2014/gmd-7-303-2014.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
S. M. Miller A. M. Michalak P. J. Levi |
spellingShingle |
S. M. Miller A. M. Michalak P. J. Levi Atmospheric inverse modeling with known physical bounds: an example from trace gas emissions Geoscientific Model Development |
author_facet |
S. M. Miller A. M. Michalak P. J. Levi |
author_sort |
S. M. Miller |
title |
Atmospheric inverse modeling with known physical bounds: an example from trace gas emissions |
title_short |
Atmospheric inverse modeling with known physical bounds: an example from trace gas emissions |
title_full |
Atmospheric inverse modeling with known physical bounds: an example from trace gas emissions |
title_fullStr |
Atmospheric inverse modeling with known physical bounds: an example from trace gas emissions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Atmospheric inverse modeling with known physical bounds: an example from trace gas emissions |
title_sort |
atmospheric inverse modeling with known physical bounds: an example from trace gas emissions |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Geoscientific Model Development |
issn |
1991-959X 1991-9603 |
publishDate |
2014-02-01 |
description |
Many inverse problems in the atmospheric sciences involve parameters with
known physical constraints. Examples include nonnegativity (e.g., emissions
of some urban air pollutants) or upward limits implied by reaction or
solubility constants. However, probabilistic inverse modeling approaches
based on Gaussian assumptions cannot incorporate such bounds and thus often
produce unrealistic results. The atmospheric literature lacks consensus on
the best means to overcome this problem, and existing atmospheric studies
rely on a limited number of the possible methods with little examination of
the relative merits of each.
<br><br>
This paper investigates the applicability of several approaches to
bounded inverse problems. A common method of data transformations is found to
unrealistically skew estimates for the examined example
application. The method of Lagrange multipliers and two Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods
yield more realistic and accurate results. In general, the examined
MCMC approaches produce the most realistic result but can require
substantial computational time. Lagrange multipliers offer an
appealing option for large, computationally intensive problems
when exact uncertainty bounds are less central to the
analysis. A synthetic data inversion of US anthropogenic methane
emissions illustrates the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. |
url |
http://www.geosci-model-dev.net/7/303/2014/gmd-7-303-2014.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT smmiller atmosphericinversemodelingwithknownphysicalboundsanexamplefromtracegasemissions AT ammichalak atmosphericinversemodelingwithknownphysicalboundsanexamplefromtracegasemissions AT pjlevi atmosphericinversemodelingwithknownphysicalboundsanexamplefromtracegasemissions |
_version_ |
1725446886601523200 |