LCCO2 of coal co-firing with imported torrefied woody biomass in Japan

In response to Japan’s increase on coal dependence, co-firing of woody biomass in a coal power plant has been considered as the most feasible sustainable alternative. We propose torrefaction as an effective method to improve the quality of biomass fuel. To measure how much CO2 can be avoided by util...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Omura Kenta, Hadi Pandyaswargo Andante, Hiroshi Onoda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187403001
id doaj-0ad1fb82048546f0ad01f16cd9096a06
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0ad1fb82048546f0ad01f16cd9096a062021-04-02T12:05:49ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422018-01-01740300110.1051/e3sconf/20187403001e3sconf_icsolca2018_03001LCCO2 of coal co-firing with imported torrefied woody biomass in JapanOmura KentaHadi Pandyaswargo AndanteHiroshi OnodaIn response to Japan’s increase on coal dependence, co-firing of woody biomass in a coal power plant has been considered as the most feasible sustainable alternative. We propose torrefaction as an effective method to improve the quality of biomass fuel. To measure how much CO2 can be avoided by utilizing torrefied fuel, Life Cycle CO2 (LCCO2) of woody biomass co-firing in the Japanese coal power plant was conducted in this study. As a comparative analysis in the LCCO2, scenarios constructed included the use of woody biomass in the form of chip, pellet, and torrefied fuel. Due to the unavailability of large quantity domestic feedstocks in Japan, Indonesia was chosen as the origin of the imported woody biomass in the simulated scenarios. The results showed that significant CO2 reduction could be achieved especially in the co-firing that includes torrefied fuel. In the case where 30cal% of torrefied fuel or 5cal% of pellets were used for co-firing in a 50 MW capacity coal power plant, 95,000 t of CO2 could be avoided annually compared to using 100% coal.https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187403001
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Omura Kenta
Hadi Pandyaswargo Andante
Hiroshi Onoda
spellingShingle Omura Kenta
Hadi Pandyaswargo Andante
Hiroshi Onoda
LCCO2 of coal co-firing with imported torrefied woody biomass in Japan
E3S Web of Conferences
author_facet Omura Kenta
Hadi Pandyaswargo Andante
Hiroshi Onoda
author_sort Omura Kenta
title LCCO2 of coal co-firing with imported torrefied woody biomass in Japan
title_short LCCO2 of coal co-firing with imported torrefied woody biomass in Japan
title_full LCCO2 of coal co-firing with imported torrefied woody biomass in Japan
title_fullStr LCCO2 of coal co-firing with imported torrefied woody biomass in Japan
title_full_unstemmed LCCO2 of coal co-firing with imported torrefied woody biomass in Japan
title_sort lcco2 of coal co-firing with imported torrefied woody biomass in japan
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2018-01-01
description In response to Japan’s increase on coal dependence, co-firing of woody biomass in a coal power plant has been considered as the most feasible sustainable alternative. We propose torrefaction as an effective method to improve the quality of biomass fuel. To measure how much CO2 can be avoided by utilizing torrefied fuel, Life Cycle CO2 (LCCO2) of woody biomass co-firing in the Japanese coal power plant was conducted in this study. As a comparative analysis in the LCCO2, scenarios constructed included the use of woody biomass in the form of chip, pellet, and torrefied fuel. Due to the unavailability of large quantity domestic feedstocks in Japan, Indonesia was chosen as the origin of the imported woody biomass in the simulated scenarios. The results showed that significant CO2 reduction could be achieved especially in the co-firing that includes torrefied fuel. In the case where 30cal% of torrefied fuel or 5cal% of pellets were used for co-firing in a 50 MW capacity coal power plant, 95,000 t of CO2 could be avoided annually compared to using 100% coal.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187403001
work_keys_str_mv AT omurakenta lcco2ofcoalcofiringwithimportedtorrefiedwoodybiomassinjapan
AT hadipandyaswargoandante lcco2ofcoalcofiringwithimportedtorrefiedwoodybiomassinjapan
AT hiroshionoda lcco2ofcoalcofiringwithimportedtorrefiedwoodybiomassinjapan
_version_ 1721570115904864256