The Strategic Impact of Corporate Responsibility and Criminal Networks on Value Co-Creation

This article is motivated by the increasing concern about the ever-declining security of pharmaceutical products due to the abundance of counterfeit network actors. We argue that if networks are effective mechanisms for criminal organizations to infiltrate into any value chain, then networks should...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Zettinig, Frederick Ahen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Carleton University 2011-02-01
Series:Technology Innovation Management Review
Online Access:http://timreview.ca/sites/default/files/Issue_PDF/march11_osbr.pdf
id doaj-0aac224d68a946ca9dcbba8e532be8a6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0aac224d68a946ca9dcbba8e532be8a62020-11-24T21:08:08ZengCarleton UniversityTechnology Innovation Management Review1927-03212011-02-01March 2011The Strategic Impact of Corporate Responsibility and Criminal Networks on Value Co-CreationPeter ZettinigFrederick AhenThis article is motivated by the increasing concern about the ever-declining security of pharmaceutical products due to the abundance of counterfeit network actors. We argue that if networks are effective mechanisms for criminal organizations to infiltrate into any value chain, then networks should also work for responsible businesses in their quests to counter this phenomenon of value destruction, which is ultimately detrimental to the value co-creation process. Thus, this article demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the strategic impact of corporate responsibility of actors in networks on value co-creation. The current discourse on value co-creation in business networks is structured in such a way that it precludes its inherent corporate responsibility component even though they are not mutually exclusive. Moreover, research on value co-creation aimed at the proactive and responsible defence of a network substance via value co-protection has been mostly scant. We propose a model of value-optimization through value co-protection and ethical responsibility. This way of theorizing has several implications for both policy making and managerial decision making in the pharmaceutical industry and beyond. http://timreview.ca/sites/default/files/Issue_PDF/march11_osbr.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter Zettinig
Frederick Ahen
spellingShingle Peter Zettinig
Frederick Ahen
The Strategic Impact of Corporate Responsibility and Criminal Networks on Value Co-Creation
Technology Innovation Management Review
author_facet Peter Zettinig
Frederick Ahen
author_sort Peter Zettinig
title The Strategic Impact of Corporate Responsibility and Criminal Networks on Value Co-Creation
title_short The Strategic Impact of Corporate Responsibility and Criminal Networks on Value Co-Creation
title_full The Strategic Impact of Corporate Responsibility and Criminal Networks on Value Co-Creation
title_fullStr The Strategic Impact of Corporate Responsibility and Criminal Networks on Value Co-Creation
title_full_unstemmed The Strategic Impact of Corporate Responsibility and Criminal Networks on Value Co-Creation
title_sort strategic impact of corporate responsibility and criminal networks on value co-creation
publisher Carleton University
series Technology Innovation Management Review
issn 1927-0321
publishDate 2011-02-01
description This article is motivated by the increasing concern about the ever-declining security of pharmaceutical products due to the abundance of counterfeit network actors. We argue that if networks are effective mechanisms for criminal organizations to infiltrate into any value chain, then networks should also work for responsible businesses in their quests to counter this phenomenon of value destruction, which is ultimately detrimental to the value co-creation process. Thus, this article demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the strategic impact of corporate responsibility of actors in networks on value co-creation. The current discourse on value co-creation in business networks is structured in such a way that it precludes its inherent corporate responsibility component even though they are not mutually exclusive. Moreover, research on value co-creation aimed at the proactive and responsible defence of a network substance via value co-protection has been mostly scant. We propose a model of value-optimization through value co-protection and ethical responsibility. This way of theorizing has several implications for both policy making and managerial decision making in the pharmaceutical industry and beyond.
url http://timreview.ca/sites/default/files/Issue_PDF/march11_osbr.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT peterzettinig thestrategicimpactofcorporateresponsibilityandcriminalnetworksonvaluecocreation
AT frederickahen thestrategicimpactofcorporateresponsibilityandcriminalnetworksonvaluecocreation
AT peterzettinig strategicimpactofcorporateresponsibilityandcriminalnetworksonvaluecocreation
AT frederickahen strategicimpactofcorporateresponsibilityandcriminalnetworksonvaluecocreation
_version_ 1716760709991235584