SOME AGRICULTURAL AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF ENERGY SAVING PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES OF MAIZE

The performance parameters, energetic characteristics and cost factors of direct drilling were evaluated by longterm trials carried out in Osztopán and Gödöllő regions. The effect of direct drilling, disking, ploughing, and soil loosening combined with disking and ploughing on the soil conditions, y...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: K TAKÁCS-GYÖRGY, K GECSE
Format: Article
Language:Bulgarian
Published: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture 2002-05-01
Series:Journal of Central European Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jcea.agr.hr/articles/25_SOME_AGRICULTURAL_AND_ECONOMIC_ASPECTS_OF_ENERGY_SAVING_PRODUCTION_TECHNOLOGIES_OF_MAIZE_en.pdf
id doaj-0aa480a9e585403aac623bfdac53bc06
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0aa480a9e585403aac623bfdac53bc062020-11-24T21:08:08ZbulUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of AgricultureJournal of Central European Agriculture1332-90492002-05-0123183190SOME AGRICULTURAL AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF ENERGY SAVING PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES OF MAIZEK TAKÁCS-GYÖRGYK GECSEThe performance parameters, energetic characteristics and cost factors of direct drilling were evaluated by longterm trials carried out in Osztopán and Gödöllő regions. The effect of direct drilling, disking, ploughing, and soil loosening combined with disking and ploughing on the soil conditions, yields and cost factors was evaluated and based on the examination results. The economic comparisons were done by gross margin analyses of various technologies. Reducing the number of field applications is limited by the risk of soil compactions and weed infestations. From an economic part of view cost saving aspects of the various cultivation methods mentioned above cannot be justified in comparison with the ploughing methods. The lowest gross margin value was 61.79 EUR t-1, direct drilling and the highest was 67.34 EUR t-1, with ploughing but it was due to the great difference between the yield as well (6.89 and 4.03 t.ha-1). The results we achieved during our research are valid only in the given conditions, they could be recalculated and complemented under other soil and agro-ecological conditions. Our purpose was to emphasise the necessity of economical calculations before making decisions on changing technology. Our suggestion is: combined application of the traditional and energy saving methods, regarding the local conditions as well.http://jcea.agr.hr/articles/25_SOME_AGRICULTURAL_AND_ECONOMIC_ASPECTS_OF_ENERGY_SAVING_PRODUCTION_TECHNOLOGIES_OF_MAIZE_en.pdfmaizeenergy savingdirect drillinggross margin analysis
collection DOAJ
language Bulgarian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author K TAKÁCS-GYÖRGY
K GECSE
spellingShingle K TAKÁCS-GYÖRGY
K GECSE
SOME AGRICULTURAL AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF ENERGY SAVING PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES OF MAIZE
Journal of Central European Agriculture
maize
energy saving
direct drilling
gross margin analysis
author_facet K TAKÁCS-GYÖRGY
K GECSE
author_sort K TAKÁCS-GYÖRGY
title SOME AGRICULTURAL AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF ENERGY SAVING PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES OF MAIZE
title_short SOME AGRICULTURAL AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF ENERGY SAVING PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES OF MAIZE
title_full SOME AGRICULTURAL AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF ENERGY SAVING PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES OF MAIZE
title_fullStr SOME AGRICULTURAL AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF ENERGY SAVING PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES OF MAIZE
title_full_unstemmed SOME AGRICULTURAL AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF ENERGY SAVING PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES OF MAIZE
title_sort some agricultural and economic aspects of energy saving production technologies of maize
publisher University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture
series Journal of Central European Agriculture
issn 1332-9049
publishDate 2002-05-01
description The performance parameters, energetic characteristics and cost factors of direct drilling were evaluated by longterm trials carried out in Osztopán and Gödöllő regions. The effect of direct drilling, disking, ploughing, and soil loosening combined with disking and ploughing on the soil conditions, yields and cost factors was evaluated and based on the examination results. The economic comparisons were done by gross margin analyses of various technologies. Reducing the number of field applications is limited by the risk of soil compactions and weed infestations. From an economic part of view cost saving aspects of the various cultivation methods mentioned above cannot be justified in comparison with the ploughing methods. The lowest gross margin value was 61.79 EUR t-1, direct drilling and the highest was 67.34 EUR t-1, with ploughing but it was due to the great difference between the yield as well (6.89 and 4.03 t.ha-1). The results we achieved during our research are valid only in the given conditions, they could be recalculated and complemented under other soil and agro-ecological conditions. Our purpose was to emphasise the necessity of economical calculations before making decisions on changing technology. Our suggestion is: combined application of the traditional and energy saving methods, regarding the local conditions as well.
topic maize
energy saving
direct drilling
gross margin analysis
url http://jcea.agr.hr/articles/25_SOME_AGRICULTURAL_AND_ECONOMIC_ASPECTS_OF_ENERGY_SAVING_PRODUCTION_TECHNOLOGIES_OF_MAIZE_en.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ktakacsgyorgy someagriculturalandeconomicaspectsofenergysavingproductiontechnologiesofmaize
AT kgecse someagriculturalandeconomicaspectsofenergysavingproductiontechnologiesofmaize
_version_ 1716760707903520768