Stress among Emergency Health Care Workers on Nuclear or Radiation Disaster: A Preliminary State Survey

• Main Authors: Jean-Baptiste Bouillon-Minois, Vincent Roux, Bruno Pereira, Mara Flannery, Carole Pelissier, Céline Occelli, Jeannot Schmidt, Valentin Navel, Frédéric Dutheil
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
• Series: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
• Subjects: disaster; emergency medicine; nuclear; radiation; prevention; public health
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8384
• ISSN: 1661-7827; 1660-4601

Background: The nuclear or radiation disaster risk within the French Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes state is low (but not absent) due to its proximity to four Nuclear Power Generation Centers and two regional cancer control centers. This study aims to compare subjective stress ratings for emergency health care workers regarding nuclear and radiation disasters between two locations: at work versus at home. Materials and Methods: We distributed an anonymous online questionnaire via RedCap^® to all emergency health care workers who could be involved in patient care after a nuclear or radiation disaster. It comprised 18 questions divided into three parts—theoretical knowledge and practical assessment, stress assessment, and sociodemographic criteria. Results: We analyzed 107 responses. There was a significant 11-point increase in stress levels between work and home regarding nuclear or radiation disaster risks (<i>p</i> = 0.01). Less than 25% of emergency health care workers surveyed benefited from annual training. Conclusion: The stress levels of emergency health care workers regarding nuclear or radiation disaster were higher at work than at home and increased without annual training. It is important to increase knowledge about these protocols and to mandate yearly training for all workers potentially involved in these disasters.