Discrepancies in self-reported financial conflicts of interest disclosures by physicians: a systematic review

Background There is a high prevalence of financial conflicts of interest (COI) between physicians and industry.Objectives To conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis examining the completeness of self-reported financial COI disclosures by physicians, and identify factors associated with non-di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cameron Taheri, Xinglin Li, Andrew C L Lam, Sam Taheri, Nancy F Olivieri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2021-04-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/4/e045306.full
id doaj-0a760f4de30f4b578afb1c92b2d4ca05
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0a760f4de30f4b578afb1c92b2d4ca052021-07-23T15:01:22ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552021-04-0111410.1136/bmjopen-2020-045306Discrepancies in self-reported financial conflicts of interest disclosures by physicians: a systematic reviewCameron Taheri0Xinglin Li1Andrew C L Lam2Sam Taheri3Nancy F Olivieri4Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaFaculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaToronto General Hospital Research Institute, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaBackground There is a high prevalence of financial conflicts of interest (COI) between physicians and industry.Objectives To conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis examining the completeness of self-reported financial COI disclosures by physicians, and identify factors associated with non-disclosure.Data sources MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO were searched for eligible studies up to April 2020 and supplemented with material identified in the references and citing articles.Data extraction and synthesis Data were independently abstracted by two authors. Data synthesis was performed via systematic review of eligible studies and random-effects meta-analysis.Main outcomes and measures The proportion of discrepancies between physician self-reported disclosures and objective payment data was the main outcome. The proportion of discrepant funds and factors associated with non-disclosure were also examined.Results 40 studies were included. The pooled proportion of COI discrepancies at the article level was 81% (range: 54%–98%; 95% CI 72% to 89%), 79% at the payment level (range: 71%–89%; 95% CI 67% to 89%), 93% at the authorship level (range: 71%–100%; 95% CI 79% to 100%) and 66% at the author level (range: 8%–99%; 95% CI 48% to 78%). The proportion of funds discrepant was 33% (range: 2%–77%; 95% CI 12% to 58%). There was high heterogeneity between studies across all five analyses (I2=94%–99%). Most undisclosed COI were related to food and beverage, or travel and lodging. While the most common explanation for failure to disclose was perceived irrelevance, a median of 45% of non-disclosed payments were directly or indirectly related to the work. A smaller monetary amount was the most common factor associated with nondisclosure.Conclusions Physician self-reports of financial COI are highly discrepant with objective data sources reporting payments from industry. Stronger policies are required to reduce reliance on physician self-reporting of financial COI and address non-compliance.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/4/e045306.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cameron Taheri
Xinglin Li
Andrew C L Lam
Sam Taheri
Nancy F Olivieri
spellingShingle Cameron Taheri
Xinglin Li
Andrew C L Lam
Sam Taheri
Nancy F Olivieri
Discrepancies in self-reported financial conflicts of interest disclosures by physicians: a systematic review
BMJ Open
author_facet Cameron Taheri
Xinglin Li
Andrew C L Lam
Sam Taheri
Nancy F Olivieri
author_sort Cameron Taheri
title Discrepancies in self-reported financial conflicts of interest disclosures by physicians: a systematic review
title_short Discrepancies in self-reported financial conflicts of interest disclosures by physicians: a systematic review
title_full Discrepancies in self-reported financial conflicts of interest disclosures by physicians: a systematic review
title_fullStr Discrepancies in self-reported financial conflicts of interest disclosures by physicians: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancies in self-reported financial conflicts of interest disclosures by physicians: a systematic review
title_sort discrepancies in self-reported financial conflicts of interest disclosures by physicians: a systematic review
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Background There is a high prevalence of financial conflicts of interest (COI) between physicians and industry.Objectives To conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis examining the completeness of self-reported financial COI disclosures by physicians, and identify factors associated with non-disclosure.Data sources MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO were searched for eligible studies up to April 2020 and supplemented with material identified in the references and citing articles.Data extraction and synthesis Data were independently abstracted by two authors. Data synthesis was performed via systematic review of eligible studies and random-effects meta-analysis.Main outcomes and measures The proportion of discrepancies between physician self-reported disclosures and objective payment data was the main outcome. The proportion of discrepant funds and factors associated with non-disclosure were also examined.Results 40 studies were included. The pooled proportion of COI discrepancies at the article level was 81% (range: 54%–98%; 95% CI 72% to 89%), 79% at the payment level (range: 71%–89%; 95% CI 67% to 89%), 93% at the authorship level (range: 71%–100%; 95% CI 79% to 100%) and 66% at the author level (range: 8%–99%; 95% CI 48% to 78%). The proportion of funds discrepant was 33% (range: 2%–77%; 95% CI 12% to 58%). There was high heterogeneity between studies across all five analyses (I2=94%–99%). Most undisclosed COI were related to food and beverage, or travel and lodging. While the most common explanation for failure to disclose was perceived irrelevance, a median of 45% of non-disclosed payments were directly or indirectly related to the work. A smaller monetary amount was the most common factor associated with nondisclosure.Conclusions Physician self-reports of financial COI are highly discrepant with objective data sources reporting payments from industry. Stronger policies are required to reduce reliance on physician self-reporting of financial COI and address non-compliance.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/4/e045306.full
work_keys_str_mv AT camerontaheri discrepanciesinselfreportedfinancialconflictsofinterestdisclosuresbyphysiciansasystematicreview
AT xinglinli discrepanciesinselfreportedfinancialconflictsofinterestdisclosuresbyphysiciansasystematicreview
AT andrewcllam discrepanciesinselfreportedfinancialconflictsofinterestdisclosuresbyphysiciansasystematicreview
AT samtaheri discrepanciesinselfreportedfinancialconflictsofinterestdisclosuresbyphysiciansasystematicreview
AT nancyfolivieri discrepanciesinselfreportedfinancialconflictsofinterestdisclosuresbyphysiciansasystematicreview
_version_ 1721285254860242944