Curiosa melancolía: spleen y tradición clásica según William Stukeley
In the early 18th century, the spleen was a curious object. It was not only an organ the function of which had baffled both ancient and modern authors, but it was also the name and the alleged seat of a type of melancholy many contemporaries believed it was an epidemic disease in England. This arti...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Portuguese |
Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
2019-08-01
|
Series: | Figura |
Online Access: | https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/figura/article/view/9951 |
id |
doaj-0a7030c46804484ba8bc900140e96eb9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0a7030c46804484ba8bc900140e96eb92021-06-22T16:12:10ZporUniversidade Estadual de CampinasFigura2317-46252019-08-016210.20396/figura.v6i2.9951Curiosa melancolía: spleen y tradición clásica según William StukeleyAndrés Gattinoni0Universidad Nacional de San Martín In the early 18th century, the spleen was a curious object. It was not only an organ the function of which had baffled both ancient and modern authors, but it was also the name and the alleged seat of a type of melancholy many contemporaries believed it was an epidemic disease in England. This article analyses a lecture on the spleen published in 1723 by the Lincolnshire physician and antiquarian William Stukeley. Placing it in the context of the quarrel between the ancients and the moderns, the paper traces the role that the classical tradition had in Stukeley’s endeavour. It argues that his selective reading of the classics sought to recover a prisca sapientiawhich favoured a theory of the spleen and its place in the microcosm with relevant theological implications. Furthermore, the ancients provided Stukeley with arguments and lessons to fight the modern spleen epidemic. https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/figura/article/view/9951 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Portuguese |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andrés Gattinoni |
spellingShingle |
Andrés Gattinoni Curiosa melancolía: spleen y tradición clásica según William Stukeley Figura |
author_facet |
Andrés Gattinoni |
author_sort |
Andrés Gattinoni |
title |
Curiosa melancolía: spleen y tradición clásica según William Stukeley |
title_short |
Curiosa melancolía: spleen y tradición clásica según William Stukeley |
title_full |
Curiosa melancolía: spleen y tradición clásica según William Stukeley |
title_fullStr |
Curiosa melancolía: spleen y tradición clásica según William Stukeley |
title_full_unstemmed |
Curiosa melancolía: spleen y tradición clásica según William Stukeley |
title_sort |
curiosa melancolía: spleen y tradición clásica según william stukeley |
publisher |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
series |
Figura |
issn |
2317-4625 |
publishDate |
2019-08-01 |
description |
In the early 18th century, the spleen was a curious object. It was not only an organ the function of which had baffled both ancient and modern authors, but it was also the name and the alleged seat of a type of melancholy many contemporaries believed it was an epidemic disease in England. This article analyses a lecture on the spleen published in 1723 by the Lincolnshire physician and antiquarian William Stukeley. Placing it in the context of the quarrel between the ancients and the moderns, the paper traces the role that the classical tradition had in Stukeley’s endeavour. It argues that his selective reading of the classics sought to recover a prisca sapientiawhich favoured a theory of the spleen and its place in the microcosm with relevant theological implications. Furthermore, the ancients provided Stukeley with arguments and lessons to fight the modern spleen epidemic.
|
url |
https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/figura/article/view/9951 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andresgattinoni curiosamelancoliaspleenytradicionclasicasegunwilliamstukeley |
_version_ |
1721363006028251136 |