Differences in the Clinical Outcome of Osteomyelitis by Treating Specialty: Orthopedics or Infectology.

Osteomyelitis is a heterogeneous infection with regard to etiology and treatment, and currently no single management protocol exists. Management of the condition is typically an interdisciplinary approach between orthopedics and infectious disease; however, the orthopedist is often the person who ma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carolina Arias Arias, Maria Carolina Tamayo Betancur, Miguel Alejandro Pinzón, Doris Cardona Arango, Cesar Antonio Capataz Taffur, Edgar Correa Prada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4683069?pdf=render
id doaj-0a635160ba0143c7bfd66e9fed671712
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0a635160ba0143c7bfd66e9fed6717122020-11-25T02:31:41ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-011012e014473610.1371/journal.pone.0144736Differences in the Clinical Outcome of Osteomyelitis by Treating Specialty: Orthopedics or Infectology.Carolina Arias AriasMaria Carolina Tamayo BetancurMiguel Alejandro PinzónDoris Cardona ArangoCesar Antonio Capataz TaffurEdgar Correa PradaOsteomyelitis is a heterogeneous infection with regard to etiology and treatment, and currently no single management protocol exists. Management of the condition is typically an interdisciplinary approach between orthopedics and infectious disease; however, the orthopedist is often the person who manages treatment. The aim of the study was to determine differences in the outcome of osteomyelitis according to its treating specialty and to identify factors associated with the recurrence of the disease. An ambispective cohort study of 129 patients with osteomyelitis was conducted and the proportions for qualitative variables and central tendency and dispersion measures for quantitative variables were calculated; the latter were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. A bivariate analysis was conducted with measures of association based on the chi square test and crude relative risk. A logistic regression model was applied and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, including the model of relevant clinical variables that fit the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. We found that 70% of patients were treated either by orthopedics or infectious disease. Patients who were treated by an orthopedist alone presented a greater risk of relapse or reinfection (RR = 4.6; 95% CI 2.3;8.9). Risk factors of osteomyelitis recurrence as determined in the regression model included the following: age of 57 years or older (RR = 1.3; 95% 0.3;5.2), long bones (RR = 1.9; 95% CI 0.5;7.1), fracture (RR = 5.0; 95% CI 0.4;51.4), monotherapy (RR = 3.0; 95% CI 0.6;14.5), receiving less than 4 weeks of antibiotics (RR = 1.5; 95% CI 0.2;10.1), inadequate treatment (RR = 3.1; 95% CI 0.4;20.1), and receiving orthopedics treatment (RR = 5.5; 95% CI 1.6;18.2). Most patients evaluated jointly by orthopedics and infectious disease received adequate treatment for osteomyelitis and had fewer relapses.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4683069?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carolina Arias Arias
Maria Carolina Tamayo Betancur
Miguel Alejandro Pinzón
Doris Cardona Arango
Cesar Antonio Capataz Taffur
Edgar Correa Prada
spellingShingle Carolina Arias Arias
Maria Carolina Tamayo Betancur
Miguel Alejandro Pinzón
Doris Cardona Arango
Cesar Antonio Capataz Taffur
Edgar Correa Prada
Differences in the Clinical Outcome of Osteomyelitis by Treating Specialty: Orthopedics or Infectology.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Carolina Arias Arias
Maria Carolina Tamayo Betancur
Miguel Alejandro Pinzón
Doris Cardona Arango
Cesar Antonio Capataz Taffur
Edgar Correa Prada
author_sort Carolina Arias Arias
title Differences in the Clinical Outcome of Osteomyelitis by Treating Specialty: Orthopedics or Infectology.
title_short Differences in the Clinical Outcome of Osteomyelitis by Treating Specialty: Orthopedics or Infectology.
title_full Differences in the Clinical Outcome of Osteomyelitis by Treating Specialty: Orthopedics or Infectology.
title_fullStr Differences in the Clinical Outcome of Osteomyelitis by Treating Specialty: Orthopedics or Infectology.
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the Clinical Outcome of Osteomyelitis by Treating Specialty: Orthopedics or Infectology.
title_sort differences in the clinical outcome of osteomyelitis by treating specialty: orthopedics or infectology.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Osteomyelitis is a heterogeneous infection with regard to etiology and treatment, and currently no single management protocol exists. Management of the condition is typically an interdisciplinary approach between orthopedics and infectious disease; however, the orthopedist is often the person who manages treatment. The aim of the study was to determine differences in the outcome of osteomyelitis according to its treating specialty and to identify factors associated with the recurrence of the disease. An ambispective cohort study of 129 patients with osteomyelitis was conducted and the proportions for qualitative variables and central tendency and dispersion measures for quantitative variables were calculated; the latter were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. A bivariate analysis was conducted with measures of association based on the chi square test and crude relative risk. A logistic regression model was applied and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, including the model of relevant clinical variables that fit the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. We found that 70% of patients were treated either by orthopedics or infectious disease. Patients who were treated by an orthopedist alone presented a greater risk of relapse or reinfection (RR = 4.6; 95% CI 2.3;8.9). Risk factors of osteomyelitis recurrence as determined in the regression model included the following: age of 57 years or older (RR = 1.3; 95% 0.3;5.2), long bones (RR = 1.9; 95% CI 0.5;7.1), fracture (RR = 5.0; 95% CI 0.4;51.4), monotherapy (RR = 3.0; 95% CI 0.6;14.5), receiving less than 4 weeks of antibiotics (RR = 1.5; 95% CI 0.2;10.1), inadequate treatment (RR = 3.1; 95% CI 0.4;20.1), and receiving orthopedics treatment (RR = 5.5; 95% CI 1.6;18.2). Most patients evaluated jointly by orthopedics and infectious disease received adequate treatment for osteomyelitis and had fewer relapses.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4683069?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT carolinaariasarias differencesintheclinicaloutcomeofosteomyelitisbytreatingspecialtyorthopedicsorinfectology
AT mariacarolinatamayobetancur differencesintheclinicaloutcomeofosteomyelitisbytreatingspecialtyorthopedicsorinfectology
AT miguelalejandropinzon differencesintheclinicaloutcomeofosteomyelitisbytreatingspecialtyorthopedicsorinfectology
AT doriscardonaarango differencesintheclinicaloutcomeofosteomyelitisbytreatingspecialtyorthopedicsorinfectology
AT cesarantoniocapataztaffur differencesintheclinicaloutcomeofosteomyelitisbytreatingspecialtyorthopedicsorinfectology
AT edgarcorreaprada differencesintheclinicaloutcomeofosteomyelitisbytreatingspecialtyorthopedicsorinfectology
_version_ 1724822733005520896