Non-religious Christians
Scholars who recently rejected secularisation theses on the grounds that they were insufficiently defined or contextualised now seem to be accepting with unseemly, uncritical haste, the new, in vogue notion of the post-secular. Scholars seem tempted to drop the term ‘post-secular’ into their papers...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Donner Institute
2012-01-01
|
Series: | Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journal.fi/scripta/article/view/67407 |
id |
doaj-0a5d5f4666234692b4cf7c13d6ac984b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0a5d5f4666234692b4cf7c13d6ac984b2020-11-24T22:25:44ZengDonner InstituteScripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis0582-32262343-49372012-01-012410.30674/scripta.67407Non-religious ChristiansAbby Day0University of KentScholars who recently rejected secularisation theses on the grounds that they were insufficiently defined or contextualised now seem to be accepting with unseemly, uncritical haste, the new, in vogue notion of the post-secular. Scholars seem tempted to drop the term ‘post-secular’ into their papers and presentations as if it is a generally accepted and understood term. It is not and nor, as this paper will argue, is it plausible unless applied to a limited and specific range of phenomena. Far from disappearing, religion is often used publicly as a marker of group identity. This is not a return to religion, or a resurgence in spirituality, but a fluctuating form of contextualised religious identity. Christian nominalists may not believe in God or Jesus, at least if belief is understood as ‘faith’. It would be incorrect, however, to dismiss them as ‘unbelievers’, or their nominalist beliefs as not having essential or substantive reality. They believe in many things, usually related to ‘belonging’. By closely examining people’s sense of Christian ‘belonging’, we find other more subtle, interwoven ‘belongings’ related to, for example, history, nation, morality, gender, and ‘culture’.https://journal.fi/scripta/article/view/67407PostsecularismChristianityImplicit religionSecularization (Sociology)SecularismBelief and doubt |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Abby Day |
spellingShingle |
Abby Day Non-religious Christians Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis Postsecularism Christianity Implicit religion Secularization (Sociology) Secularism Belief and doubt |
author_facet |
Abby Day |
author_sort |
Abby Day |
title |
Non-religious Christians |
title_short |
Non-religious Christians |
title_full |
Non-religious Christians |
title_fullStr |
Non-religious Christians |
title_full_unstemmed |
Non-religious Christians |
title_sort |
non-religious christians |
publisher |
Donner Institute |
series |
Scripta Instituti Donneriani Aboensis |
issn |
0582-3226 2343-4937 |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
Scholars who recently rejected secularisation theses on the grounds that they were insufficiently defined or contextualised now seem to be accepting with unseemly, uncritical haste, the new, in vogue notion of the post-secular. Scholars seem tempted to drop the term ‘post-secular’ into their papers and presentations as if it is a generally accepted and understood term. It is not and nor, as this paper will argue, is it plausible unless applied to a limited and specific range of phenomena. Far from disappearing, religion is often used publicly as a marker of group identity. This is not a return to religion, or a resurgence in spirituality, but a fluctuating form of contextualised religious identity. Christian nominalists may not believe in God or Jesus, at least if belief is understood as ‘faith’. It would be incorrect, however, to dismiss them as ‘unbelievers’, or their nominalist beliefs as not having essential or substantive reality. They believe in many things, usually related to ‘belonging’. By closely examining people’s sense of Christian ‘belonging’, we find other more subtle, interwoven ‘belongings’ related to, for example, history, nation, morality, gender, and ‘culture’. |
topic |
Postsecularism Christianity Implicit religion Secularization (Sociology) Secularism Belief and doubt |
url |
https://journal.fi/scripta/article/view/67407 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT abbyday nonreligiouschristians |
_version_ |
1725756692567687168 |