Does the use of patient decision aids lead to cost savings? a systematic review

Objectives To update a previous systematic review to determine if patient decision aid (PDA) interventions generate savings in healthcare settings, and if so, from which perspective (ie, patient, organisation providing care, society).Design Systematic review.Data sources MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, W...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paul J Barr, Ciaran O'Neill, Heather B Blunt, Grainne E Crealey, Pamela J Bagley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/11/e036834.full
id doaj-0a562005594e40439eb18d0b8f480ef6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0a562005594e40439eb18d0b8f480ef62021-06-25T12:35:10ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-11-01101110.1136/bmjopen-2020-036834Does the use of patient decision aids lead to cost savings? a systematic reviewPaul J Barr0Ciaran O'Neill1Heather B Blunt2Grainne E Crealey3Pamela J Bagley4The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USACentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Belfast, UKDartmouth College Biomedical Libraries, Hanover, New Hampshire, USAClinical Costing Solutions, Belfast, UKDartmouth College Biomedical Libraries, Hanover, New Hampshire, USAObjectives To update a previous systematic review to determine if patient decision aid (PDA) interventions generate savings in healthcare settings, and if so, from which perspective (ie, patient, organisation providing care, society).Design Systematic review.Data sources MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Campbell Collaboration Library, EconLit, Business Source Complete, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination: NHS Economic Evaluations Database (NHS EED), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) from 15 March 2013 to 25 January 2019. The references of studies that met the eligibility criteria and any publications related to conference abstracts or registered clinical trials were reviewed to increase the sensitivity of the search.Eligibility criteria Full and partial economic evaluations with an experimental, quasi-experimental or randomised controlled design were included. The intervention had to satisfy the pre-determined minimum conditions necessary to be defined as a PDA, and (for full evaluations) provide details on the comparator used.Data extraction and synthesis All study outcomes and economic data were extracted. The reporting and quality of the economic analyses were independently assessed by two health economists.Results Of 5066 studies, 22 studies were included, including the 8 studies from the previous review. Twelve studies reported cost-savings (range=US$10 to US$81 156; US dollars in 2020), primarily from the organisational or health system perspective, and 10 studies did not. However, due to the quality of the economic analyses, and the related issues with the interpretative validity of results it would be inappropriate to say that PDAs will generate savings, from any perspective.Conclusions It is unclear whether PDAs will generate savings. Greater consensus on what constitutes a PDA and the need to compare them against usual care over a sufficient time horizon to allow valid assessment of costs and outcomes is required.PROSPERO registration number CRD42019118457.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/11/e036834.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paul J Barr
Ciaran O'Neill
Heather B Blunt
Grainne E Crealey
Pamela J Bagley
spellingShingle Paul J Barr
Ciaran O'Neill
Heather B Blunt
Grainne E Crealey
Pamela J Bagley
Does the use of patient decision aids lead to cost savings? a systematic review
BMJ Open
author_facet Paul J Barr
Ciaran O'Neill
Heather B Blunt
Grainne E Crealey
Pamela J Bagley
author_sort Paul J Barr
title Does the use of patient decision aids lead to cost savings? a systematic review
title_short Does the use of patient decision aids lead to cost savings? a systematic review
title_full Does the use of patient decision aids lead to cost savings? a systematic review
title_fullStr Does the use of patient decision aids lead to cost savings? a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Does the use of patient decision aids lead to cost savings? a systematic review
title_sort does the use of patient decision aids lead to cost savings? a systematic review
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Objectives To update a previous systematic review to determine if patient decision aid (PDA) interventions generate savings in healthcare settings, and if so, from which perspective (ie, patient, organisation providing care, society).Design Systematic review.Data sources MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, Campbell Collaboration Library, EconLit, Business Source Complete, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination: NHS Economic Evaluations Database (NHS EED), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) from 15 March 2013 to 25 January 2019. The references of studies that met the eligibility criteria and any publications related to conference abstracts or registered clinical trials were reviewed to increase the sensitivity of the search.Eligibility criteria Full and partial economic evaluations with an experimental, quasi-experimental or randomised controlled design were included. The intervention had to satisfy the pre-determined minimum conditions necessary to be defined as a PDA, and (for full evaluations) provide details on the comparator used.Data extraction and synthesis All study outcomes and economic data were extracted. The reporting and quality of the economic analyses were independently assessed by two health economists.Results Of 5066 studies, 22 studies were included, including the 8 studies from the previous review. Twelve studies reported cost-savings (range=US$10 to US$81 156; US dollars in 2020), primarily from the organisational or health system perspective, and 10 studies did not. However, due to the quality of the economic analyses, and the related issues with the interpretative validity of results it would be inappropriate to say that PDAs will generate savings, from any perspective.Conclusions It is unclear whether PDAs will generate savings. Greater consensus on what constitutes a PDA and the need to compare them against usual care over a sufficient time horizon to allow valid assessment of costs and outcomes is required.PROSPERO registration number CRD42019118457.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/11/e036834.full
work_keys_str_mv AT pauljbarr doestheuseofpatientdecisionaidsleadtocostsavingsasystematicreview
AT ciaranoneill doestheuseofpatientdecisionaidsleadtocostsavingsasystematicreview
AT heatherbblunt doestheuseofpatientdecisionaidsleadtocostsavingsasystematicreview
AT grainneecrealey doestheuseofpatientdecisionaidsleadtocostsavingsasystematicreview
AT pamelajbagley doestheuseofpatientdecisionaidsleadtocostsavingsasystematicreview
_version_ 1721359750589841408