Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Central Sleep Apnea: Five-Year Safety and Efficacy Outcomes
Maria Rosa Costanzo,1 Shahrokh Javaheri,2,3 Piotr Ponikowski,4 Olaf Oldenburg,5 Ralph Augostini,3 Lee R Goldberg,6 Christoph Stellbrink,7 Henrik Fox,8 Alan R Schwartz,6 Sanjaya Gupta,9 Scott McKane,10 Timothy E Meyer,10 William T Abraham3 for the remedē®System Pivotal Trial Study Group1Advoc...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Nature and Science of Sleep |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.dovepress.com/transvenous-phrenic-nerve-stimulation-for-treatment-of-central-sleep-a-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-NSS |
id |
doaj-0a467c8072874356af8b63c49844d0f8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0a467c8072874356af8b63c49844d0f82021-04-29T19:52:48ZengDove Medical PressNature and Science of Sleep1179-16082021-04-01Volume 1351552664357Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Central Sleep Apnea: Five-Year Safety and Efficacy OutcomesCostanzo MRJavaheri SPonikowski POldenburg OAugostini RGoldberg LRStellbrink CFox HSchwartz ARGupta SMcKane SMeyer TEAbraham WTMaria Rosa Costanzo,1 Shahrokh Javaheri,2,3 Piotr Ponikowski,4 Olaf Oldenburg,5 Ralph Augostini,3 Lee R Goldberg,6 Christoph Stellbrink,7 Henrik Fox,8 Alan R Schwartz,6 Sanjaya Gupta,9 Scott McKane,10 Timothy E Meyer,10 William T Abraham3 for the remedē®System Pivotal Trial Study Group1Advocate Heart Institute, Naperville, IL, USA; 2Bethesda North Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA; 3The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; 4Department of Heart Diseases, Medical University, Military Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland; 5Ludgerus-Kliniken Münster, Clemens Hospital, Münster, Germany; 6University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 7Bielefeld Medical Center, Bielefeld, Germany; 8Clinic for General and Interventional Cardiology Angiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany; 9University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Saint Luke’s Mid-America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO, USA; 10Respicardia, Inc., Minnetonka, MN, USACorrespondence: Maria Rosa CostanzoAdvocate Heart Institute, Naperville, IL, 60566, USAEmail mariarosa.costanzo@aah.orgBackground: The remedē System Pivotal Trial was a prospective, multi-center, randomized trial demonstrating transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) therapy is safe and effectively treats central sleep apnea (CSA) and improves sleep architecture and daytime sleepiness. Subsequently, the remedē System was approved by FDA in 2017. As a condition of approval, the Post Approval Study (PAS) collected clinical evidence regarding long-term safety and effectiveness in adults with moderate to severe CSA through five years post implant.Methods: Patients remaining in the Pivotal Trial at the time of FDA approval were invited to enroll in the PAS and consented to undergo sleep studies (scored by a central laboratory), complete the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) questionnaire to assess daytime sleepiness, and safety assessment. All subjects (treatment and former control group) receiving active therapy were pooled; data from both trials were combined for analysis.Results: Fifty-three of the original 151 Pivotal Trial patients consented to participate in the PAS and 52 completed the 5-year visit. Following TPNS therapy, the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), central-apnea index (CAI), arousal index, oxygen desaturation index, and sleep architecture showed sustained improvements. Comparing 5 years to baseline, AHI and CAI decreased significantly (AHI baseline median 46 events/hour vs 17 at 5 years; CAI baseline median 23 events/hour vs 1 at 5 years), though residual hypopneas were present. In parallel, the arousal index, oxygen desaturation index and sleep architecture improved. The ESS improved by a statistically significant median reduction of 3 points at 5 years. Serious adverse events related to implant procedure, device or delivered therapy were reported by 14% of patients which include 16 (9%) patients who underwent a pulse generator reposition or lead revision (primarily in the first year). None of the events caused long-term harm. No unanticipated adverse device effects or related deaths occurred through 5 years.Conclusion: Long-term TPNS safely improves CSA, sleep architecture and daytime sleepiness through 5 years post implant.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01816776.Keywords: central sleep apnea, phrenic nerve stimulationhttps://www.dovepress.com/transvenous-phrenic-nerve-stimulation-for-treatment-of-central-sleep-a-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-NSScentral sleep apneaphrenic nerve stimulation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Costanzo MR Javaheri S Ponikowski P Oldenburg O Augostini R Goldberg LR Stellbrink C Fox H Schwartz AR Gupta S McKane S Meyer TE Abraham WT |
spellingShingle |
Costanzo MR Javaheri S Ponikowski P Oldenburg O Augostini R Goldberg LR Stellbrink C Fox H Schwartz AR Gupta S McKane S Meyer TE Abraham WT Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Central Sleep Apnea: Five-Year Safety and Efficacy Outcomes Nature and Science of Sleep central sleep apnea phrenic nerve stimulation |
author_facet |
Costanzo MR Javaheri S Ponikowski P Oldenburg O Augostini R Goldberg LR Stellbrink C Fox H Schwartz AR Gupta S McKane S Meyer TE Abraham WT |
author_sort |
Costanzo MR |
title |
Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Central Sleep Apnea: Five-Year Safety and Efficacy Outcomes |
title_short |
Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Central Sleep Apnea: Five-Year Safety and Efficacy Outcomes |
title_full |
Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Central Sleep Apnea: Five-Year Safety and Efficacy Outcomes |
title_fullStr |
Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Central Sleep Apnea: Five-Year Safety and Efficacy Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Central Sleep Apnea: Five-Year Safety and Efficacy Outcomes |
title_sort |
transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation for treatment of central sleep apnea: five-year safety and efficacy outcomes |
publisher |
Dove Medical Press |
series |
Nature and Science of Sleep |
issn |
1179-1608 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
Maria Rosa Costanzo,1 Shahrokh Javaheri,2,3 Piotr Ponikowski,4 Olaf Oldenburg,5 Ralph Augostini,3 Lee R Goldberg,6 Christoph Stellbrink,7 Henrik Fox,8 Alan R Schwartz,6 Sanjaya Gupta,9 Scott McKane,10 Timothy E Meyer,10 William T Abraham3 for the remedē®System Pivotal Trial Study Group1Advocate Heart Institute, Naperville, IL, USA; 2Bethesda North Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA; 3The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; 4Department of Heart Diseases, Medical University, Military Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland; 5Ludgerus-Kliniken Münster, Clemens Hospital, Münster, Germany; 6University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 7Bielefeld Medical Center, Bielefeld, Germany; 8Clinic for General and Interventional Cardiology Angiology, Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany; 9University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Saint Luke’s Mid-America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO, USA; 10Respicardia, Inc., Minnetonka, MN, USACorrespondence: Maria Rosa CostanzoAdvocate Heart Institute, Naperville, IL, 60566, USAEmail mariarosa.costanzo@aah.orgBackground: The remedē System Pivotal Trial was a prospective, multi-center, randomized trial demonstrating transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) therapy is safe and effectively treats central sleep apnea (CSA) and improves sleep architecture and daytime sleepiness. Subsequently, the remedē System was approved by FDA in 2017. As a condition of approval, the Post Approval Study (PAS) collected clinical evidence regarding long-term safety and effectiveness in adults with moderate to severe CSA through five years post implant.Methods: Patients remaining in the Pivotal Trial at the time of FDA approval were invited to enroll in the PAS and consented to undergo sleep studies (scored by a central laboratory), complete the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) questionnaire to assess daytime sleepiness, and safety assessment. All subjects (treatment and former control group) receiving active therapy were pooled; data from both trials were combined for analysis.Results: Fifty-three of the original 151 Pivotal Trial patients consented to participate in the PAS and 52 completed the 5-year visit. Following TPNS therapy, the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), central-apnea index (CAI), arousal index, oxygen desaturation index, and sleep architecture showed sustained improvements. Comparing 5 years to baseline, AHI and CAI decreased significantly (AHI baseline median 46 events/hour vs 17 at 5 years; CAI baseline median 23 events/hour vs 1 at 5 years), though residual hypopneas were present. In parallel, the arousal index, oxygen desaturation index and sleep architecture improved. The ESS improved by a statistically significant median reduction of 3 points at 5 years. Serious adverse events related to implant procedure, device or delivered therapy were reported by 14% of patients which include 16 (9%) patients who underwent a pulse generator reposition or lead revision (primarily in the first year). None of the events caused long-term harm. No unanticipated adverse device effects or related deaths occurred through 5 years.Conclusion: Long-term TPNS safely improves CSA, sleep architecture and daytime sleepiness through 5 years post implant.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01816776.Keywords: central sleep apnea, phrenic nerve stimulation |
topic |
central sleep apnea phrenic nerve stimulation |
url |
https://www.dovepress.com/transvenous-phrenic-nerve-stimulation-for-treatment-of-central-sleep-a-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-NSS |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT costanzomr transvenousphrenicnervestimulationfortreatmentofcentralsleepapneafiveyearsafetyandefficacyoutcomes AT javaheris transvenousphrenicnervestimulationfortreatmentofcentralsleepapneafiveyearsafetyandefficacyoutcomes AT ponikowskip transvenousphrenicnervestimulationfortreatmentofcentralsleepapneafiveyearsafetyandefficacyoutcomes AT oldenburgo transvenousphrenicnervestimulationfortreatmentofcentralsleepapneafiveyearsafetyandefficacyoutcomes AT augostinir transvenousphrenicnervestimulationfortreatmentofcentralsleepapneafiveyearsafetyandefficacyoutcomes AT goldberglr transvenousphrenicnervestimulationfortreatmentofcentralsleepapneafiveyearsafetyandefficacyoutcomes AT stellbrinkc transvenousphrenicnervestimulationfortreatmentofcentralsleepapneafiveyearsafetyandefficacyoutcomes AT foxh transvenousphrenicnervestimulationfortreatmentofcentralsleepapneafiveyearsafetyandefficacyoutcomes AT schwartzar transvenousphrenicnervestimulationfortreatmentofcentralsleepapneafiveyearsafetyandefficacyoutcomes AT guptas transvenousphrenicnervestimulationfortreatmentofcentralsleepapneafiveyearsafetyandefficacyoutcomes AT mckanes transvenousphrenicnervestimulationfortreatmentofcentralsleepapneafiveyearsafetyandefficacyoutcomes AT meyerte transvenousphrenicnervestimulationfortreatmentofcentralsleepapneafiveyearsafetyandefficacyoutcomes AT abrahamwt transvenousphrenicnervestimulationfortreatmentofcentralsleepapneafiveyearsafetyandefficacyoutcomes |
_version_ |
1721500275204685824 |