Comparative cytogenetics of two of the smallest Amazonian fishes: Fluviphylax simplex Costa, 1996 and Fluviphylax zonatus Costa, 1996 (Cyprinodontiformes, Poeciliidae)

The genus Fluviphylax Whitley, 1965 is comprized of five valid species (F. pygmaeus Myers et Carvalho, 1955, F. zonatus, F. simplex, F. obscurus Costa, 1996, and F. palikur Costa et Le Bail, 1999), which are endemic to the Amazon region. These fishes are the smallest known South American vertebrates...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eduardo Souza, Leila Ribeiro, E Feldberg, Izeni Farias, Tomas Hrbek, Maria Gross
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2011-12-01
Series:Comparative Cytogenetics
Online Access:http://compcytogen.pensoft.net/lib/ajax_srv/article_elements_srv.php?action=download_pdf&item_id=1738
id doaj-0a23c1ca65d04963a9c5251f55b803bf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0a23c1ca65d04963a9c5251f55b803bf2020-11-25T00:35:01ZengPensoft PublishersComparative Cytogenetics1993-07711993-078X2011-12-015541142210.3897/compcytogen.v5i5.15621738Comparative cytogenetics of two of the smallest Amazonian fishes: Fluviphylax simplex Costa, 1996 and Fluviphylax zonatus Costa, 1996 (Cyprinodontiformes, Poeciliidae)Eduardo SouzaLeila RibeiroE FeldbergIzeni FariasTomas HrbekMaria GrossThe genus Fluviphylax Whitley, 1965 is comprized of five valid species (F. pygmaeus Myers et Carvalho, 1955, F. zonatus, F. simplex, F. obscurus Costa, 1996, and F. palikur Costa et Le Bail, 1999), which are endemic to the Amazon region. These fishes are the smallest known South American vertebrates and among the smallest know vertebrates on Earth. All species but the type F. pygmaeus have been described in late 1990’s, and much remains unknown about the biology, taxonomy and systematics of this group of fishes. The aims of the present study were to establish the diploid and haploid number of F. zonatus and F. simplex, and to find species-specific markers for the discrimination of taxa. The diploid number for both species was 48 chromosomes, with no sex chromosome heteromorphism. Fluviphylax zonatus exhibited the karyotypic formula 4m+8sm+22st+14a and FN=82, and F. simplex exhibited 4m+16sm+18st+10a and FN=86. The determination of the total mean length of the chromosomes and their grouping into five size classes demonstrated different chromosome composition of the two species. This difference was further supported by the distribution of constitutive heterochromatin. The meiotic analysis revealed 24 bivalents in both species, but F. zonatus exhibited chromosomes with late pairing of the telomeric portions in the pachytene. These data reveal that cytogenetic characterization is useful and important for the discrimination of these species. Our study further indicates that this method could be employed in the analysis of other species of small fishes that are difficult to distinguish using traditional morphological traits or are morphologically cryptic.http://compcytogen.pensoft.net/lib/ajax_srv/article_elements_srv.php?action=download_pdf&item_id=1738
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eduardo Souza
Leila Ribeiro
E Feldberg
Izeni Farias
Tomas Hrbek
Maria Gross
spellingShingle Eduardo Souza
Leila Ribeiro
E Feldberg
Izeni Farias
Tomas Hrbek
Maria Gross
Comparative cytogenetics of two of the smallest Amazonian fishes: Fluviphylax simplex Costa, 1996 and Fluviphylax zonatus Costa, 1996 (Cyprinodontiformes, Poeciliidae)
Comparative Cytogenetics
author_facet Eduardo Souza
Leila Ribeiro
E Feldberg
Izeni Farias
Tomas Hrbek
Maria Gross
author_sort Eduardo Souza
title Comparative cytogenetics of two of the smallest Amazonian fishes: Fluviphylax simplex Costa, 1996 and Fluviphylax zonatus Costa, 1996 (Cyprinodontiformes, Poeciliidae)
title_short Comparative cytogenetics of two of the smallest Amazonian fishes: Fluviphylax simplex Costa, 1996 and Fluviphylax zonatus Costa, 1996 (Cyprinodontiformes, Poeciliidae)
title_full Comparative cytogenetics of two of the smallest Amazonian fishes: Fluviphylax simplex Costa, 1996 and Fluviphylax zonatus Costa, 1996 (Cyprinodontiformes, Poeciliidae)
title_fullStr Comparative cytogenetics of two of the smallest Amazonian fishes: Fluviphylax simplex Costa, 1996 and Fluviphylax zonatus Costa, 1996 (Cyprinodontiformes, Poeciliidae)
title_full_unstemmed Comparative cytogenetics of two of the smallest Amazonian fishes: Fluviphylax simplex Costa, 1996 and Fluviphylax zonatus Costa, 1996 (Cyprinodontiformes, Poeciliidae)
title_sort comparative cytogenetics of two of the smallest amazonian fishes: fluviphylax simplex costa, 1996 and fluviphylax zonatus costa, 1996 (cyprinodontiformes, poeciliidae)
publisher Pensoft Publishers
series Comparative Cytogenetics
issn 1993-0771
1993-078X
publishDate 2011-12-01
description The genus Fluviphylax Whitley, 1965 is comprized of five valid species (F. pygmaeus Myers et Carvalho, 1955, F. zonatus, F. simplex, F. obscurus Costa, 1996, and F. palikur Costa et Le Bail, 1999), which are endemic to the Amazon region. These fishes are the smallest known South American vertebrates and among the smallest know vertebrates on Earth. All species but the type F. pygmaeus have been described in late 1990’s, and much remains unknown about the biology, taxonomy and systematics of this group of fishes. The aims of the present study were to establish the diploid and haploid number of F. zonatus and F. simplex, and to find species-specific markers for the discrimination of taxa. The diploid number for both species was 48 chromosomes, with no sex chromosome heteromorphism. Fluviphylax zonatus exhibited the karyotypic formula 4m+8sm+22st+14a and FN=82, and F. simplex exhibited 4m+16sm+18st+10a and FN=86. The determination of the total mean length of the chromosomes and their grouping into five size classes demonstrated different chromosome composition of the two species. This difference was further supported by the distribution of constitutive heterochromatin. The meiotic analysis revealed 24 bivalents in both species, but F. zonatus exhibited chromosomes with late pairing of the telomeric portions in the pachytene. These data reveal that cytogenetic characterization is useful and important for the discrimination of these species. Our study further indicates that this method could be employed in the analysis of other species of small fishes that are difficult to distinguish using traditional morphological traits or are morphologically cryptic.
url http://compcytogen.pensoft.net/lib/ajax_srv/article_elements_srv.php?action=download_pdf&item_id=1738
work_keys_str_mv AT eduardosouza comparativecytogeneticsoftwoofthesmallestamazonianfishesfluviphylaxsimplexcosta1996andfluviphylaxzonatuscosta1996cyprinodontiformespoeciliidae
AT leilaribeiro comparativecytogeneticsoftwoofthesmallestamazonianfishesfluviphylaxsimplexcosta1996andfluviphylaxzonatuscosta1996cyprinodontiformespoeciliidae
AT efeldberg comparativecytogeneticsoftwoofthesmallestamazonianfishesfluviphylaxsimplexcosta1996andfluviphylaxzonatuscosta1996cyprinodontiformespoeciliidae
AT izenifarias comparativecytogeneticsoftwoofthesmallestamazonianfishesfluviphylaxsimplexcosta1996andfluviphylaxzonatuscosta1996cyprinodontiformespoeciliidae
AT tomashrbek comparativecytogeneticsoftwoofthesmallestamazonianfishesfluviphylaxsimplexcosta1996andfluviphylaxzonatuscosta1996cyprinodontiformespoeciliidae
AT mariagross comparativecytogeneticsoftwoofthesmallestamazonianfishesfluviphylaxsimplexcosta1996andfluviphylaxzonatuscosta1996cyprinodontiformespoeciliidae
_version_ 1725310818584625152