Monitor units are not predictive of neutron dose for high-energy IMRT

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Due to the substantial increase in beam-on time of high energy intensity-modulated radiotherapy (>10 MV) techniques to deliver the same target dose compared to conventional treatment techniques, an increased dose of scatter radiat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hälg Roger A, Besserer Jürgen, Boschung Markus, Mayer Sabine, Schneider Uwe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-08-01
Series:Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.ro-journal.com/content/7/1/138
Description
Summary:<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Due to the substantial increase in beam-on time of high energy intensity-modulated radiotherapy (>10 MV) techniques to deliver the same target dose compared to conventional treatment techniques, an increased dose of scatter radiation, including neutrons, is delivered to the patient. As a consequence, an increase in second malignancies may be expected in the future with the application of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. It is commonly assumed that the neutron dose equivalent scales with the number of monitor units.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Measurements of neutron dose equivalent were performed for an open and an intensity-modulated field at four positions: inside and outside of the treatment field at 0.2 cm and 15 cm depth, respectively.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>It was shown that the neutron dose equivalent, which a patient receives during an intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment, does not scale with the ratio of applied monitor units relative to an open field irradiation. Outside the treatment volume at larger depth 35% less neutron dose equivalent is delivered than expected.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The predicted increase of second cancer induction rates from intensity-modulated treatment techniques can be overestimated when the neutron dose is simply scaled with monitor units.</p>
ISSN:1748-717X