The normalization of tension in US-Iran relations from the perspective of ontological security

• Main Authors: farideh amani, Abas mokarami, mohhamad sotode
• Format: Article
• Language: fas
• Published: Qom Islamic Azad University 2019-08-01
• Series: سپهر سیاست
• Subjects: iran-us relations; international system; ontological security; identity; conflict
• Online Access: http://se.journal.qom-iau.ac.ir/article_667451_48a186d3b3d1ce431e341892d7b36222.pdf
• ISSN: 2538-5674; 2538-5674

Relations between Iran and the United States have undergone tensions and divergences after the Islamic Revolution in Iran. So that perspective of both countries regarding international issues is in contrast with each other. Although each of these two countries, at some points, tried to talk about a number of issues that guaranteed their security and mutual benefits, but many factors interrupted it and prevented detente in bilateral relations between the two countries. Bilateral relations have been established between the two countries. Accordingly, the question is why, despite the direct and indirect contacts and negotiations between the two countries, Iran and the United States have not yet established their bilateral official relations?<strong>.</strong>Based on the theory of ontological security, it is assumed that the hostility of Iran and the United States due to basic conflict has become common for both countries, and none of these two countries want to unsettle these normal relations and endanger its ontological security by establishing official relations.The findings of this study indicate that, given the continuous lack of official relations and lasting hostility between the parties for many decades and also giving identification basic disputes, ontological security has become very important to them. This paper uses a descriptive analytical method to advance its hypothesis.