DIMENSIONS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY OF SPORT GOVERNING BODIES OF GHANA: DEVELOPMENT OF A SCALE

Based on the McKinsey Capacity Assessment Grid (McKinsey Company,2001), we generated79 items to represent 14 dimensionsof organizationalcapacity of national sport governing bodies in Ghana. The respondents (n = 226)from the regional branches of 22 national sport governing bodies...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher Essilfie, Packianathan Chelladurai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Social Sciences Research Society 2016-07-01
Series:International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies
Online Access:http://www.sobiad.org/eJOURNALS/journal_IJSS/arhieves/IJSS2016_2/Paper18_Essilfie_Chelladurai.pdf
id doaj-0a0979e3dd7f4f75a5f93f892a444811
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0a0979e3dd7f4f75a5f93f892a4448112020-11-24T22:40:00ZengSocial Sciences Research SocietyInternational Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies1309-80631309-80632016-07-01822016080203DIMENSIONS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY OF SPORT GOVERNING BODIES OF GHANA: DEVELOPMENT OF A SCALEChristopher EssilfiePackianathan ChelladuraiBased on the McKinsey Capacity Assessment Grid (McKinsey Company,2001), we generated79 items to represent 14 dimensionsof organizationalcapacity of national sport governing bodies in Ghana. The respondents (n = 226)from the regional branches of 22 national sport governing bodies in Ghana scoredtheir level of agreement on a seven-point scale with each of the 79 items. Thoseitems that did not correlate well with the total for the respective subscale andthose subscales with reliability estimates lower than .6 were eliminated. Further,each subscale was subjected to factor analysis extracting only one factor. The toploading four items were retained to represent the subscale. The resulting 48 itemsrepresenting 12 dimensions of organizational capacity were subjected toconfirmatory factor analysis. As the fit indices did not meet with acceptablestandards, we resorted to item parceling creating two parcels of two items each torepresent a factor. The CFA of the parceled items showed that the fit indices wereacceptable ( #967;2/df =382.971/177 = 2.164 (p lower than 0.001); RMSEA = .072 (.062-.082);TLI = .93; CFI = .952).If the stability of the subscale structure of this instrumentcould be confirmed with a new data set from another national context, the scalewould be a valuable tool to evaluate the organizational capacity of national sportgoverning bodies around the world.http://www.sobiad.org/eJOURNALS/journal_IJSS/arhieves/IJSS2016_2/Paper18_Essilfie_Chelladurai.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christopher Essilfie
Packianathan Chelladurai
spellingShingle Christopher Essilfie
Packianathan Chelladurai
DIMENSIONS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY OF SPORT GOVERNING BODIES OF GHANA: DEVELOPMENT OF A SCALE
International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies
author_facet Christopher Essilfie
Packianathan Chelladurai
author_sort Christopher Essilfie
title DIMENSIONS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY OF SPORT GOVERNING BODIES OF GHANA: DEVELOPMENT OF A SCALE
title_short DIMENSIONS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY OF SPORT GOVERNING BODIES OF GHANA: DEVELOPMENT OF A SCALE
title_full DIMENSIONS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY OF SPORT GOVERNING BODIES OF GHANA: DEVELOPMENT OF A SCALE
title_fullStr DIMENSIONS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY OF SPORT GOVERNING BODIES OF GHANA: DEVELOPMENT OF A SCALE
title_full_unstemmed DIMENSIONS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY OF SPORT GOVERNING BODIES OF GHANA: DEVELOPMENT OF A SCALE
title_sort dimensions of organizational capacity of sport governing bodies of ghana: development of a scale
publisher Social Sciences Research Society
series International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies
issn 1309-8063
1309-8063
publishDate 2016-07-01
description Based on the McKinsey Capacity Assessment Grid (McKinsey Company,2001), we generated79 items to represent 14 dimensionsof organizationalcapacity of national sport governing bodies in Ghana. The respondents (n = 226)from the regional branches of 22 national sport governing bodies in Ghana scoredtheir level of agreement on a seven-point scale with each of the 79 items. Thoseitems that did not correlate well with the total for the respective subscale andthose subscales with reliability estimates lower than .6 were eliminated. Further,each subscale was subjected to factor analysis extracting only one factor. The toploading four items were retained to represent the subscale. The resulting 48 itemsrepresenting 12 dimensions of organizational capacity were subjected toconfirmatory factor analysis. As the fit indices did not meet with acceptablestandards, we resorted to item parceling creating two parcels of two items each torepresent a factor. The CFA of the parceled items showed that the fit indices wereacceptable ( #967;2/df =382.971/177 = 2.164 (p lower than 0.001); RMSEA = .072 (.062-.082);TLI = .93; CFI = .952).If the stability of the subscale structure of this instrumentcould be confirmed with a new data set from another national context, the scalewould be a valuable tool to evaluate the organizational capacity of national sportgoverning bodies around the world.
url http://www.sobiad.org/eJOURNALS/journal_IJSS/arhieves/IJSS2016_2/Paper18_Essilfie_Chelladurai.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT christopheressilfie dimensionsoforganizationalcapacityofsportgoverningbodiesofghanadevelopmentofascale
AT packianathanchelladurai dimensionsoforganizationalcapacityofsportgoverningbodiesofghanadevelopmentofascale
_version_ 1725706399115116544