Comparison of beam technique and 5.5 centimeter rule for determing site of TMS stimulation for major depressive disorder
Main Authors: | J. Halper, C. Yagi, A. Manevitz, K. Nishimoto, A. Onishi |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2016-09-01
|
Series: | Brain Stimulation |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X16301486 |
Similar Items
-
Is There Role For TMS Delivered At Intesities At Or Below 100% Resting Motor Threshold (RMT)?
by: James Halper, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01) -
Reliability of targeting methods in TMS for depression: Beam F3 vs. 5.5 cm
by: Nicholas T. Trapp, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01) -
Treatment of Fibromyalgia (FM) with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS): Two Case Reports, Literature Review and Implications for Further Studies
by: James Halper, MD, et al.
Published: (2014-09-01) -
Review of 200 Patients (7,000 treatments) Clinical Outcomes of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)Therapy performed in a Naturalistic Clinical Setting using the Brainsway™ (H coil) and Neurostar™ Stimulators: A BioPsychoSocial Integrated Clinical Care Approach
by: Alan Manevitz, MD, et al.
Published: (2015-09-01) -
TMS Treatment of Two Cases of Schizo-Obsessive Disorder (SC-OD), Literature Review and Implications for Treatment and Pathophysiology of SC-OD
by: James Halper, MD, et al.
Published: (2015-09-01)