Repetita iuvant? Nota sul concetto di “esposizione ripetuta” in estetica

Why do we make the aesthetic judgements and have the aesthetic preferences that we do? How and to what extent does repeated exposure to a certain aesthetic object influence our appreciation and taste for it? The present paper aims at reflecting on the role played by repetition in enhancing people�...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mariagrazia Portera
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Università degli Studi di Milano 2018-07-01
Series:Itinera
Online Access:https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/itinera/article/view/10507
id doaj-09da90de75a64abf929d2b59ec8f3e8d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-09da90de75a64abf929d2b59ec8f3e8d2020-11-25T03:33:49ZengUniversità degli Studi di MilanoItinera2039-92512018-07-011510.13130/2039-9251/10507Repetita iuvant? Nota sul concetto di “esposizione ripetuta” in esteticaMariagrazia Portera0Università degli Studi di FirenzeWhy do we make the aesthetic judgements and have the aesthetic preferences that we do? How and to what extent does repeated exposure to a certain aesthetic object influence our appreciation and taste for it? The present paper aims at reflecting on the role played by repetition in enhancing people's appreciation and attitudes towards an aesthetic stimulus (either a work of art or a natural object or event). Almost forty years ago the Polish-born psychologist Robert Zajonc famously championed the so-called "mere-exposure effect" hypothesis (Zajonc 1968), according to which repeated exposure of an individual to a stimulus is a sufficient condition for the enhancement of his/her attitude toward it. When applied to the aesthetic case, however, Zajonc's theory produces inconsistent evidence. Is repetition useful or, more precisely, is it true that "the more we repeat, the more we like"? Repetita iuvant? https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/itinera/article/view/10507
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mariagrazia Portera
spellingShingle Mariagrazia Portera
Repetita iuvant? Nota sul concetto di “esposizione ripetuta” in estetica
Itinera
author_facet Mariagrazia Portera
author_sort Mariagrazia Portera
title Repetita iuvant? Nota sul concetto di “esposizione ripetuta” in estetica
title_short Repetita iuvant? Nota sul concetto di “esposizione ripetuta” in estetica
title_full Repetita iuvant? Nota sul concetto di “esposizione ripetuta” in estetica
title_fullStr Repetita iuvant? Nota sul concetto di “esposizione ripetuta” in estetica
title_full_unstemmed Repetita iuvant? Nota sul concetto di “esposizione ripetuta” in estetica
title_sort repetita iuvant? nota sul concetto di “esposizione ripetuta” in estetica
publisher Università degli Studi di Milano
series Itinera
issn 2039-9251
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Why do we make the aesthetic judgements and have the aesthetic preferences that we do? How and to what extent does repeated exposure to a certain aesthetic object influence our appreciation and taste for it? The present paper aims at reflecting on the role played by repetition in enhancing people's appreciation and attitudes towards an aesthetic stimulus (either a work of art or a natural object or event). Almost forty years ago the Polish-born psychologist Robert Zajonc famously championed the so-called "mere-exposure effect" hypothesis (Zajonc 1968), according to which repeated exposure of an individual to a stimulus is a sufficient condition for the enhancement of his/her attitude toward it. When applied to the aesthetic case, however, Zajonc's theory produces inconsistent evidence. Is repetition useful or, more precisely, is it true that "the more we repeat, the more we like"? Repetita iuvant?
url https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/itinera/article/view/10507
work_keys_str_mv AT mariagraziaportera repetitaiuvantnotasulconcettodiesposizioneripetutainestetica
_version_ 1724561475385688064