Evaluation of 19 cases of inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injections
<b>Background: </b> Inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injection is a serious iatrogenic complication. <b> Aim:</b> To study risk factors, management, and visual outcome of inadvertent globe perforation during periocular injection, in cases referred to a tertiar...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2007-01-01
|
Series: | Indian Journal of Ophthalmology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2007;volume=55;issue=2;spage=103;epage=107;aulast=Gadkari |
id |
doaj-09cf761150424c19a16cdccab02b68bb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-09cf761150424c19a16cdccab02b68bb2020-11-24T23:13:26ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47382007-01-01552103107Evaluation of 19 cases of inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injectionsGadkari Salil<b>Background: </b> Inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injection is a serious iatrogenic complication. <b> Aim:</b> To study risk factors, management, and visual outcome of inadvertent globe perforation during periocular injection, in cases referred to a tertiary eye care center. <b> Design and Setting:</b> Retrospective study at a tertiary referral center with a single investigator. <b> Materials and Methods:</b> Nineteen consecutive cases with a clinical diagnosis of globe perforation were studied (1998-2004). Clinical setting, risk factors, clinical presentation, management, and visual outcome were analyzed. <b> Results:</b> Retrobulbar injections 6 (32%), peribulbar injections 10 (53%), and subconjunctival injections 3 (16%) were responsible for inadvertent globe perforation. Anesthetists accounted for 6 (32%) injections and 13 (69%) were referred from high volume community settings. Anesthetists identified the mishap on the table in 17% (1 out of 6) of cases and the ophthalmologists in 69% (9 out of 13) myopia was present in 10 (53%). Breaks were located inferotemporally in nine eyes. Four underwent laser and cryopexy, 14 (74%) underwent vitreous surgery. Visual acuity greater than 20/200 was achieved in 12 patients. <b> Conclusion: </b> Myopia was found to be a significant risk factor. Inferotemporal breaks were common. Anesthetists were more likely to miss this complication when it occurred. In this series, intervention salvaged vision in a significant number of eyes.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2007;volume=55;issue=2;spage=103;epage=107;aulast=GadkariGlobe perforationinadvertent intraocular injectionperiocular injection. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gadkari Salil |
spellingShingle |
Gadkari Salil Evaluation of 19 cases of inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injections Indian Journal of Ophthalmology Globe perforation inadvertent intraocular injection periocular injection. |
author_facet |
Gadkari Salil |
author_sort |
Gadkari Salil |
title |
Evaluation of 19 cases of inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injections |
title_short |
Evaluation of 19 cases of inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injections |
title_full |
Evaluation of 19 cases of inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injections |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of 19 cases of inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injections |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of 19 cases of inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injections |
title_sort |
evaluation of 19 cases of inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injections |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology |
issn |
0301-4738 |
publishDate |
2007-01-01 |
description |
<b>Background: </b> Inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injection is a serious iatrogenic complication. <b> Aim:</b> To study risk factors, management, and visual outcome of inadvertent globe perforation during periocular injection, in cases referred to a tertiary eye care center. <b> Design and Setting:</b> Retrospective study at a tertiary referral center with a single investigator. <b> Materials and Methods:</b> Nineteen consecutive cases with a clinical diagnosis of globe perforation were studied (1998-2004). Clinical setting, risk factors, clinical presentation, management, and visual outcome were analyzed. <b> Results:</b> Retrobulbar injections 6 (32%), peribulbar injections 10 (53%), and subconjunctival injections 3 (16%) were responsible for inadvertent globe perforation. Anesthetists accounted for 6 (32%) injections and 13 (69%) were referred from high volume community settings. Anesthetists identified the mishap on the table in 17% (1 out of 6) of cases and the ophthalmologists in 69% (9 out of 13) myopia was present in 10 (53%). Breaks were located inferotemporally in nine eyes. Four underwent laser and cryopexy, 14 (74%) underwent vitreous surgery. Visual acuity greater than 20/200 was achieved in 12 patients. <b> Conclusion: </b> Myopia was found to be a significant risk factor. Inferotemporal breaks were common. Anesthetists were more likely to miss this complication when it occurred. In this series, intervention salvaged vision in a significant number of eyes. |
topic |
Globe perforation inadvertent intraocular injection periocular injection. |
url |
http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2007;volume=55;issue=2;spage=103;epage=107;aulast=Gadkari |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gadkarisalil evaluationof19casesofinadvertentglobeperforationduetoperiocularinjections |
_version_ |
1725598348971343872 |