Evaluation of 19 cases of inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injections

<b>Background: </b> Inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injection is a serious iatrogenic complication. <b> Aim:</b> To study risk factors, management, and visual outcome of inadvertent globe perforation during periocular injection, in cases referred to a tertiar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gadkari Salil
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2007-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2007;volume=55;issue=2;spage=103;epage=107;aulast=Gadkari
id doaj-09cf761150424c19a16cdccab02b68bb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-09cf761150424c19a16cdccab02b68bb2020-11-24T23:13:26ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47382007-01-01552103107Evaluation of 19 cases of inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injectionsGadkari Salil<b>Background: </b> Inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injection is a serious iatrogenic complication. <b> Aim:</b> To study risk factors, management, and visual outcome of inadvertent globe perforation during periocular injection, in cases referred to a tertiary eye care center. <b> Design and Setting:</b> Retrospective study at a tertiary referral center with a single investigator. <b> Materials and Methods:</b> Nineteen consecutive cases with a clinical diagnosis of globe perforation were studied (1998-2004). Clinical setting, risk factors, clinical presentation, management, and visual outcome were analyzed. <b> Results:</b> Retrobulbar injections 6 (32&#x0025;), peribulbar injections 10 (53&#x0025;), and subconjunctival injections 3 (16&#x0025;) were responsible for inadvertent globe perforation. Anesthetists accounted for 6 (32&#x0025;) injections and 13 (69&#x0025;) were referred from high volume community settings. Anesthetists identified the mishap on the table in 17&#x0025; (1 out of 6) of cases and the ophthalmologists in 69&#x0025; (9 out of 13) myopia was present in 10 (53&#x0025;). Breaks were located inferotemporally in nine eyes. Four underwent laser and cryopexy, 14 (74&#x0025;) underwent vitreous surgery. Visual acuity greater than 20/200 was achieved in 12 patients. <b> Conclusion: </b> Myopia was found to be a significant risk factor. Inferotemporal breaks were common. Anesthetists were more likely to miss this complication when it occurred. In this series, intervention salvaged vision in a significant number of eyes.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2007;volume=55;issue=2;spage=103;epage=107;aulast=GadkariGlobe perforationinadvertent intraocular injectionperiocular injection.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gadkari Salil
spellingShingle Gadkari Salil
Evaluation of 19 cases of inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injections
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Globe perforation
inadvertent intraocular injection
periocular injection.
author_facet Gadkari Salil
author_sort Gadkari Salil
title Evaluation of 19 cases of inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injections
title_short Evaluation of 19 cases of inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injections
title_full Evaluation of 19 cases of inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injections
title_fullStr Evaluation of 19 cases of inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injections
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of 19 cases of inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injections
title_sort evaluation of 19 cases of inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injections
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 0301-4738
publishDate 2007-01-01
description <b>Background: </b> Inadvertent globe perforation due to periocular injection is a serious iatrogenic complication. <b> Aim:</b> To study risk factors, management, and visual outcome of inadvertent globe perforation during periocular injection, in cases referred to a tertiary eye care center. <b> Design and Setting:</b> Retrospective study at a tertiary referral center with a single investigator. <b> Materials and Methods:</b> Nineteen consecutive cases with a clinical diagnosis of globe perforation were studied (1998-2004). Clinical setting, risk factors, clinical presentation, management, and visual outcome were analyzed. <b> Results:</b> Retrobulbar injections 6 (32&#x0025;), peribulbar injections 10 (53&#x0025;), and subconjunctival injections 3 (16&#x0025;) were responsible for inadvertent globe perforation. Anesthetists accounted for 6 (32&#x0025;) injections and 13 (69&#x0025;) were referred from high volume community settings. Anesthetists identified the mishap on the table in 17&#x0025; (1 out of 6) of cases and the ophthalmologists in 69&#x0025; (9 out of 13) myopia was present in 10 (53&#x0025;). Breaks were located inferotemporally in nine eyes. Four underwent laser and cryopexy, 14 (74&#x0025;) underwent vitreous surgery. Visual acuity greater than 20/200 was achieved in 12 patients. <b> Conclusion: </b> Myopia was found to be a significant risk factor. Inferotemporal breaks were common. Anesthetists were more likely to miss this complication when it occurred. In this series, intervention salvaged vision in a significant number of eyes.
topic Globe perforation
inadvertent intraocular injection
periocular injection.
url http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2007;volume=55;issue=2;spage=103;epage=107;aulast=Gadkari
work_keys_str_mv AT gadkarisalil evaluationof19casesofinadvertentglobeperforationduetoperiocularinjections
_version_ 1725598348971343872