Social and economic factors of the natural risk increasing: estimation of the Russian regions

This study is an attempt to assess quantitatively social and economic factors that determine vulnerability of Russian regions to natural risk, to trace the space differences of the considered factors, and to group the regions by their similarity. In order to indicate the regional differences in soci...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: E. Petrova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2004-01-01
Series:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/4/243/2004/nhess-4-243-2004.pdf
id doaj-09ccece7f5ba46969c22d4e7c4c4fff3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-09ccece7f5ba46969c22d4e7c4c4fff32020-11-24T21:29:44ZengCopernicus PublicationsNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences1561-86331684-99812004-01-0142243248Social and economic factors of the natural risk increasing: estimation of the Russian regionsE. PetrovaThis study is an attempt to assess quantitatively social and economic factors that determine vulnerability of Russian regions to natural risk, to trace the space differences of the considered factors, and to group the regions by their similarity. In order to indicate the regional differences in social and economic development, equipment condition, dangerous substances accumulation, and social trouble four the most suitable parameters were estimated, including the per capita production of Gross Regional Product (GRP), capital consumption, volume of total toxic waste, and crime rate. Increase of the first parameter causes vulnerability reducing, the increase of the last three causes its increasing. Using multidimensional cluster analysis five types of regions were found for Russia according to similarity of the considered parameters. These types are characterized with higher value of a single (rarely two) chosen parameter, which seems to be sufficient enough to affect natural risks increasing in these regions in near future. Only few regions belonging to the fifth type proved to have rather high value of GRP and relatively low values of the other parameters. The negative correlation was found between a number of natural disasters (ND) and the per capita GRP in case when some parameters reached anomalously high value. The distinctions between regions by prevailing different parameters, which result in natural risk increasing, help risk management to find directions where to focus on.http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/4/243/2004/nhess-4-243-2004.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author E. Petrova
spellingShingle E. Petrova
Social and economic factors of the natural risk increasing: estimation of the Russian regions
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
author_facet E. Petrova
author_sort E. Petrova
title Social and economic factors of the natural risk increasing: estimation of the Russian regions
title_short Social and economic factors of the natural risk increasing: estimation of the Russian regions
title_full Social and economic factors of the natural risk increasing: estimation of the Russian regions
title_fullStr Social and economic factors of the natural risk increasing: estimation of the Russian regions
title_full_unstemmed Social and economic factors of the natural risk increasing: estimation of the Russian regions
title_sort social and economic factors of the natural risk increasing: estimation of the russian regions
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
issn 1561-8633
1684-9981
publishDate 2004-01-01
description This study is an attempt to assess quantitatively social and economic factors that determine vulnerability of Russian regions to natural risk, to trace the space differences of the considered factors, and to group the regions by their similarity. In order to indicate the regional differences in social and economic development, equipment condition, dangerous substances accumulation, and social trouble four the most suitable parameters were estimated, including the per capita production of Gross Regional Product (GRP), capital consumption, volume of total toxic waste, and crime rate. Increase of the first parameter causes vulnerability reducing, the increase of the last three causes its increasing. Using multidimensional cluster analysis five types of regions were found for Russia according to similarity of the considered parameters. These types are characterized with higher value of a single (rarely two) chosen parameter, which seems to be sufficient enough to affect natural risks increasing in these regions in near future. Only few regions belonging to the fifth type proved to have rather high value of GRP and relatively low values of the other parameters. The negative correlation was found between a number of natural disasters (ND) and the per capita GRP in case when some parameters reached anomalously high value. The distinctions between regions by prevailing different parameters, which result in natural risk increasing, help risk management to find directions where to focus on.
url http://www.nat-hazards-earth-syst-sci.net/4/243/2004/nhess-4-243-2004.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT epetrova socialandeconomicfactorsofthenaturalriskincreasingestimationoftherussianregions
_version_ 1725965892771119104