A simulation approach to assessing sampling strategies for insect pests: an example with the balsam gall midge.

Estimation of pest density is a basic requirement for integrated pest management in agriculture and forestry, and efficiency in density estimation is a common goal. Sequential sampling techniques promise efficient sampling, but their application can involve cumbersome mathematics and/or intensive wa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R Drew Carleton, Stephen B Heard, Peter J Silk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24376556/?tool=EBI
id doaj-09ba3115f1054c8f9d01bffe4cd0cbff
record_format Article
spelling doaj-09ba3115f1054c8f9d01bffe4cd0cbff2021-03-03T20:17:51ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01812e8261810.1371/journal.pone.0082618A simulation approach to assessing sampling strategies for insect pests: an example with the balsam gall midge.R Drew CarletonStephen B HeardPeter J SilkEstimation of pest density is a basic requirement for integrated pest management in agriculture and forestry, and efficiency in density estimation is a common goal. Sequential sampling techniques promise efficient sampling, but their application can involve cumbersome mathematics and/or intensive warm-up sampling when pests have complex within- or between-site distributions. We provide tools for assessing the efficiency of sequential sampling and of alternative, simpler sampling plans, using computer simulation with "pre-sampling" data. We illustrate our approach using data for balsam gall midge (Paradiplosis tumifex) attack in Christmas tree farms. Paradiplosis tumifex proved recalcitrant to sequential sampling techniques. Midge distributions could not be fit by a common negative binomial distribution across sites. Local parameterization, using warm-up samples to estimate the clumping parameter k for each site, performed poorly: k estimates were unreliable even for samples of n ∼ 100 trees. These methods were further confounded by significant within-site spatial autocorrelation. Much simpler sampling schemes, involving random or belt-transect sampling to preset sample sizes, were effective and efficient for P. tumifex. Sampling via belt transects (through the longest dimension of a stand) was the most efficient, with sample means converging on true mean density for sample sizes of n ∼ 25-40 trees. Pre-sampling and simulation techniques provide a simple method for assessing sampling strategies for estimating insect infestation. We suspect that many pests will resemble P. tumifex in challenging the assumptions of sequential sampling methods. Our software will allow practitioners to optimize sampling strategies before they are brought to real-world applications, while potentially avoiding the need for the cumbersome calculations required for sequential sampling methods.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24376556/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author R Drew Carleton
Stephen B Heard
Peter J Silk
spellingShingle R Drew Carleton
Stephen B Heard
Peter J Silk
A simulation approach to assessing sampling strategies for insect pests: an example with the balsam gall midge.
PLoS ONE
author_facet R Drew Carleton
Stephen B Heard
Peter J Silk
author_sort R Drew Carleton
title A simulation approach to assessing sampling strategies for insect pests: an example with the balsam gall midge.
title_short A simulation approach to assessing sampling strategies for insect pests: an example with the balsam gall midge.
title_full A simulation approach to assessing sampling strategies for insect pests: an example with the balsam gall midge.
title_fullStr A simulation approach to assessing sampling strategies for insect pests: an example with the balsam gall midge.
title_full_unstemmed A simulation approach to assessing sampling strategies for insect pests: an example with the balsam gall midge.
title_sort simulation approach to assessing sampling strategies for insect pests: an example with the balsam gall midge.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Estimation of pest density is a basic requirement for integrated pest management in agriculture and forestry, and efficiency in density estimation is a common goal. Sequential sampling techniques promise efficient sampling, but their application can involve cumbersome mathematics and/or intensive warm-up sampling when pests have complex within- or between-site distributions. We provide tools for assessing the efficiency of sequential sampling and of alternative, simpler sampling plans, using computer simulation with "pre-sampling" data. We illustrate our approach using data for balsam gall midge (Paradiplosis tumifex) attack in Christmas tree farms. Paradiplosis tumifex proved recalcitrant to sequential sampling techniques. Midge distributions could not be fit by a common negative binomial distribution across sites. Local parameterization, using warm-up samples to estimate the clumping parameter k for each site, performed poorly: k estimates were unreliable even for samples of n ∼ 100 trees. These methods were further confounded by significant within-site spatial autocorrelation. Much simpler sampling schemes, involving random or belt-transect sampling to preset sample sizes, were effective and efficient for P. tumifex. Sampling via belt transects (through the longest dimension of a stand) was the most efficient, with sample means converging on true mean density for sample sizes of n ∼ 25-40 trees. Pre-sampling and simulation techniques provide a simple method for assessing sampling strategies for estimating insect infestation. We suspect that many pests will resemble P. tumifex in challenging the assumptions of sequential sampling methods. Our software will allow practitioners to optimize sampling strategies before they are brought to real-world applications, while potentially avoiding the need for the cumbersome calculations required for sequential sampling methods.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24376556/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT rdrewcarleton asimulationapproachtoassessingsamplingstrategiesforinsectpestsanexamplewiththebalsamgallmidge
AT stephenbheard asimulationapproachtoassessingsamplingstrategiesforinsectpestsanexamplewiththebalsamgallmidge
AT peterjsilk asimulationapproachtoassessingsamplingstrategiesforinsectpestsanexamplewiththebalsamgallmidge
AT rdrewcarleton simulationapproachtoassessingsamplingstrategiesforinsectpestsanexamplewiththebalsamgallmidge
AT stephenbheard simulationapproachtoassessingsamplingstrategiesforinsectpestsanexamplewiththebalsamgallmidge
AT peterjsilk simulationapproachtoassessingsamplingstrategiesforinsectpestsanexamplewiththebalsamgallmidge
_version_ 1714823060601700352