Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Network Meta-Analysis
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common vaginal dysbiosis in women of reproductive age. However, the cure rate for BV varies considerably and many women experience a relapse after the initial treatment. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical cure rates (CCRs) in randomized controlled...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Antibiotics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/10/8/978 |
id |
doaj-09a76eb3588d4126a6aac495dac972b7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-09a76eb3588d4126a6aac495dac972b72021-08-26T13:28:10ZengMDPI AGAntibiotics2079-63822021-08-011097897810.3390/antibiotics10080978Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Network Meta-AnalysisAlison Muñoz-Barreno0Fausto Cabezas-Mera1Eduardo Tejera2António Machado3Instituto de Microbiología, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales (COCIBA), Campus Cumbayá, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Diego de Robles y Vía Interoceánica, Quito 170901, EcuadorInstituto de Microbiología, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales (COCIBA), Campus Cumbayá, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Diego de Robles y Vía Interoceánica, Quito 170901, EcuadorGrupo de Bioquimioinformática, Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Agropecuarias Aplicadas, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito 170125, EcuadorInstituto de Microbiología, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales (COCIBA), Campus Cumbayá, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Diego de Robles y Vía Interoceánica, Quito 170901, EcuadorBacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common vaginal dysbiosis in women of reproductive age. However, the cure rate for BV varies considerably and many women experience a relapse after the initial treatment. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical cure rates (CCRs) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) through different therapies and administration routes. This meta-analysis included a final set of 25 eligible studies with a total of 57 RCTs and compared the effectiveness of BV treatments among non-pregnant and pregnant women. The initial range of CCRs varied greatly from 46.75% to 96.20% and the final pooled CCR was 75.5% (CI: 69.4–80.8) using the random model. The heterogeneity indices were Q = 418.91, I2 = 94.27%, and τ = 0.7498 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). No publication bias was observed according to Funnel plot symmetry and Egger’s linear regression test (<i>p</i> = 0.1097). To evaluate different variables, sub-group analysis, meta-regressions, and network meta-analysis were also realized. The highest P-scores in CCR were obtained by: (1) a combined therapy with local probiotic treatment and application of antibiotics by both administration route (oral clindamycin and local 5-nitroimidazole; P-score = 0.92); (2) a combined therapy with oral administration of 5-nitroimidazole and probiotic treatment (P-score = 0.82); (3) and a combined therapy with local administration of 5-nitroimidazole and oral probiotic treatment (P-score = 0.68). A clear-cut decision of the best BV treatment was not possible due to the heterogeneity of outcomes reported in the trials, indicating the necessity for a better characterization of RCTs. Finally, combined therapies suggested the reduction of the optimal concentration of antibiotics, and double phase treatments of antibiotics indicated an increment of CCRs in BV.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/10/8/978bacterial vaginosisantibioticsprobioticscombined therapiesrandomized controlled trialsmeta-analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alison Muñoz-Barreno Fausto Cabezas-Mera Eduardo Tejera António Machado |
spellingShingle |
Alison Muñoz-Barreno Fausto Cabezas-Mera Eduardo Tejera António Machado Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Network Meta-Analysis Antibiotics bacterial vaginosis antibiotics probiotics combined therapies randomized controlled trials meta-analysis |
author_facet |
Alison Muñoz-Barreno Fausto Cabezas-Mera Eduardo Tejera António Machado |
author_sort |
Alison Muñoz-Barreno |
title |
Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Network Meta-Analysis |
title_short |
Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Network Meta-Analysis |
title_full |
Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Network Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Network Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Network Meta-Analysis |
title_sort |
comparative effectiveness of treatments for bacterial vaginosis: a network meta-analysis |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Antibiotics |
issn |
2079-6382 |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common vaginal dysbiosis in women of reproductive age. However, the cure rate for BV varies considerably and many women experience a relapse after the initial treatment. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical cure rates (CCRs) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) through different therapies and administration routes. This meta-analysis included a final set of 25 eligible studies with a total of 57 RCTs and compared the effectiveness of BV treatments among non-pregnant and pregnant women. The initial range of CCRs varied greatly from 46.75% to 96.20% and the final pooled CCR was 75.5% (CI: 69.4–80.8) using the random model. The heterogeneity indices were Q = 418.91, I2 = 94.27%, and τ = 0.7498 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). No publication bias was observed according to Funnel plot symmetry and Egger’s linear regression test (<i>p</i> = 0.1097). To evaluate different variables, sub-group analysis, meta-regressions, and network meta-analysis were also realized. The highest P-scores in CCR were obtained by: (1) a combined therapy with local probiotic treatment and application of antibiotics by both administration route (oral clindamycin and local 5-nitroimidazole; P-score = 0.92); (2) a combined therapy with oral administration of 5-nitroimidazole and probiotic treatment (P-score = 0.82); (3) and a combined therapy with local administration of 5-nitroimidazole and oral probiotic treatment (P-score = 0.68). A clear-cut decision of the best BV treatment was not possible due to the heterogeneity of outcomes reported in the trials, indicating the necessity for a better characterization of RCTs. Finally, combined therapies suggested the reduction of the optimal concentration of antibiotics, and double phase treatments of antibiotics indicated an increment of CCRs in BV. |
topic |
bacterial vaginosis antibiotics probiotics combined therapies randomized controlled trials meta-analysis |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/10/8/978 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alisonmunozbarreno comparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforbacterialvaginosisanetworkmetaanalysis AT faustocabezasmera comparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforbacterialvaginosisanetworkmetaanalysis AT eduardotejera comparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforbacterialvaginosisanetworkmetaanalysis AT antoniomachado comparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforbacterialvaginosisanetworkmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1721195213222838272 |