Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Network Meta-Analysis

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common vaginal dysbiosis in women of reproductive age. However, the cure rate for BV varies considerably and many women experience a relapse after the initial treatment. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical cure rates (CCRs) in randomized controlled...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alison Muñoz-Barreno, Fausto Cabezas-Mera, Eduardo Tejera, António Machado
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Antibiotics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/10/8/978
id doaj-09a76eb3588d4126a6aac495dac972b7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-09a76eb3588d4126a6aac495dac972b72021-08-26T13:28:10ZengMDPI AGAntibiotics2079-63822021-08-011097897810.3390/antibiotics10080978Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Network Meta-AnalysisAlison Muñoz-Barreno0Fausto Cabezas-Mera1Eduardo Tejera2António Machado3Instituto de Microbiología, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales (COCIBA), Campus Cumbayá, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Diego de Robles y Vía Interoceánica, Quito 170901, EcuadorInstituto de Microbiología, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales (COCIBA), Campus Cumbayá, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Diego de Robles y Vía Interoceánica, Quito 170901, EcuadorGrupo de Bioquimioinformática, Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Agropecuarias Aplicadas, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito 170125, EcuadorInstituto de Microbiología, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales (COCIBA), Campus Cumbayá, Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Diego de Robles y Vía Interoceánica, Quito 170901, EcuadorBacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common vaginal dysbiosis in women of reproductive age. However, the cure rate for BV varies considerably and many women experience a relapse after the initial treatment. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical cure rates (CCRs) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) through different therapies and administration routes. This meta-analysis included a final set of 25 eligible studies with a total of 57 RCTs and compared the effectiveness of BV treatments among non-pregnant and pregnant women. The initial range of CCRs varied greatly from 46.75% to 96.20% and the final pooled CCR was 75.5% (CI: 69.4–80.8) using the random model. The heterogeneity indices were Q = 418.91, I2 = 94.27%, and τ = 0.7498 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). No publication bias was observed according to Funnel plot symmetry and Egger’s linear regression test (<i>p</i> = 0.1097). To evaluate different variables, sub-group analysis, meta-regressions, and network meta-analysis were also realized. The highest P-scores in CCR were obtained by: (1) a combined therapy with local probiotic treatment and application of antibiotics by both administration route (oral clindamycin and local 5-nitroimidazole; P-score = 0.92); (2) a combined therapy with oral administration of 5-nitroimidazole and probiotic treatment (P-score = 0.82); (3) and a combined therapy with local administration of 5-nitroimidazole and oral probiotic treatment (P-score = 0.68). A clear-cut decision of the best BV treatment was not possible due to the heterogeneity of outcomes reported in the trials, indicating the necessity for a better characterization of RCTs. Finally, combined therapies suggested the reduction of the optimal concentration of antibiotics, and double phase treatments of antibiotics indicated an increment of CCRs in BV.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/10/8/978bacterial vaginosisantibioticsprobioticscombined therapiesrandomized controlled trialsmeta-analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alison Muñoz-Barreno
Fausto Cabezas-Mera
Eduardo Tejera
António Machado
spellingShingle Alison Muñoz-Barreno
Fausto Cabezas-Mera
Eduardo Tejera
António Machado
Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Network Meta-Analysis
Antibiotics
bacterial vaginosis
antibiotics
probiotics
combined therapies
randomized controlled trials
meta-analysis
author_facet Alison Muñoz-Barreno
Fausto Cabezas-Mera
Eduardo Tejera
António Machado
author_sort Alison Muñoz-Barreno
title Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparative effectiveness of treatments for bacterial vaginosis: a network meta-analysis
publisher MDPI AG
series Antibiotics
issn 2079-6382
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common vaginal dysbiosis in women of reproductive age. However, the cure rate for BV varies considerably and many women experience a relapse after the initial treatment. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical cure rates (CCRs) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) through different therapies and administration routes. This meta-analysis included a final set of 25 eligible studies with a total of 57 RCTs and compared the effectiveness of BV treatments among non-pregnant and pregnant women. The initial range of CCRs varied greatly from 46.75% to 96.20% and the final pooled CCR was 75.5% (CI: 69.4–80.8) using the random model. The heterogeneity indices were Q = 418.91, I2 = 94.27%, and τ = 0.7498 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). No publication bias was observed according to Funnel plot symmetry and Egger’s linear regression test (<i>p</i> = 0.1097). To evaluate different variables, sub-group analysis, meta-regressions, and network meta-analysis were also realized. The highest P-scores in CCR were obtained by: (1) a combined therapy with local probiotic treatment and application of antibiotics by both administration route (oral clindamycin and local 5-nitroimidazole; P-score = 0.92); (2) a combined therapy with oral administration of 5-nitroimidazole and probiotic treatment (P-score = 0.82); (3) and a combined therapy with local administration of 5-nitroimidazole and oral probiotic treatment (P-score = 0.68). A clear-cut decision of the best BV treatment was not possible due to the heterogeneity of outcomes reported in the trials, indicating the necessity for a better characterization of RCTs. Finally, combined therapies suggested the reduction of the optimal concentration of antibiotics, and double phase treatments of antibiotics indicated an increment of CCRs in BV.
topic bacterial vaginosis
antibiotics
probiotics
combined therapies
randomized controlled trials
meta-analysis
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/10/8/978
work_keys_str_mv AT alisonmunozbarreno comparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforbacterialvaginosisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT faustocabezasmera comparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforbacterialvaginosisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT eduardotejera comparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforbacterialvaginosisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT antoniomachado comparativeeffectivenessoftreatmentsforbacterialvaginosisanetworkmetaanalysis
_version_ 1721195213222838272