Reporting and methodologic evaluation of meta-analyses published in the anesthesia literature according to AMSTAR and PRISMA checklists: a preliminary study
BackgroundThere have been few recent reports on the methodological quality of meta-analysis, despite the enormous number of studies using meta-analytic techniques in the field of anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quality of meta-analyses and systematic reviews according to th...
Main Authors: | Jae Hoon Oh, Woo Jong Shin, Suin Park, Jae Soon Chung |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
2017-08-01
|
Series: | Korean Journal of Anesthesiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-70-446.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Quality evaluation of Systematic Reviews (PRISMA, AMSTAR-2) of platelet rich plasma as a method of tissue regeneration in odontology.
by: Carolina Garcés, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01) -
Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR
by: Svjetlana Dosenovic, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01) -
Evaluation of the reliability, usability, and applicability of AMSTAR, AMSTAR 2, and ROBIS: protocol for a descriptive analytic study
by: Allison Gates, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01) -
A Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-Analysis Studies in Dance Therapy Using AMSTAR and AMSTAR 2
by: Hye-Ryeon Kim, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS)
by: Patrick Sequeira-Byron, et al.
Published: (2011-10-01)