Countering violent extremism in Indonesia: priorities, practice and the role of civil society

Indonesia has experimented with initiatives aimed at countering violent extremism (CVE) since the wave of arrests following the first Bali bombing attack in 2002. Initial efforts involved police attempting to develop relationships of trust with terrorists in custody. Today, a broader range of strate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cameron Sumpter
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Daniel Koehler 2017-06-01
Series:Journal for Deradicalization
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/view/103
id doaj-09a1851b698a47e79b64ff36db39631f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-09a1851b698a47e79b64ff36db39631f2020-11-25T00:28:37ZdeuDaniel KoehlerJournal for Deradicalization2363-98492363-98492017-06-01Summer11112147Countering violent extremism in Indonesia: priorities, practice and the role of civil societyCameron Sumpter0S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS)Indonesia has experimented with initiatives aimed at countering violent extremism (CVE) since the wave of arrests following the first Bali bombing attack in 2002. Initial efforts involved police attempting to develop relationships of trust with terrorists in custody. Today, a broader range of strategies are employed, from promoting peace among youth and thwarting the allure of extremist narratives, to managing prisoners and assisting former terrorists reintegrate with society. The lead government body since 2010 has been the national counterterrorism agency, Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Terorisme (BNPT), which is tasked with coordinating stakeholders in Indonesia’s struggle with domestic terrorism. But managing the divergent and sometimes competing interests of Indonesia’s large state institutions has not been straightforward, and effective collaboration between relevant state agencies remains an obstacle to the success of CVE initiatives. Where government has fallen short, civil society organisations (CSOs) often fill the gaps, and a number of dedicated practitioners now have invaluable experience, local contacts, and the specific knowledge required for countering extremism in the Indonesian context. CSOs also possess greater levels of trust among the communities they engage than security-centric state agencies could possibly hope to achieve. Yet instead of exploiting these civil society resources, the BNPT has largely preferred an independent (and top-down) approach to CVE initiatives, collaborating if and when assistance is required. The Indonesian government should make better use of the unique legitimacy and expertise of civil society organisations. http://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/view/103IndonesiaCountering Violent ExremismCivil Society
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cameron Sumpter
spellingShingle Cameron Sumpter
Countering violent extremism in Indonesia: priorities, practice and the role of civil society
Journal for Deradicalization
Indonesia
Countering Violent Exremism
Civil Society
author_facet Cameron Sumpter
author_sort Cameron Sumpter
title Countering violent extremism in Indonesia: priorities, practice and the role of civil society
title_short Countering violent extremism in Indonesia: priorities, practice and the role of civil society
title_full Countering violent extremism in Indonesia: priorities, practice and the role of civil society
title_fullStr Countering violent extremism in Indonesia: priorities, practice and the role of civil society
title_full_unstemmed Countering violent extremism in Indonesia: priorities, practice and the role of civil society
title_sort countering violent extremism in indonesia: priorities, practice and the role of civil society
publisher Daniel Koehler
series Journal for Deradicalization
issn 2363-9849
2363-9849
publishDate 2017-06-01
description Indonesia has experimented with initiatives aimed at countering violent extremism (CVE) since the wave of arrests following the first Bali bombing attack in 2002. Initial efforts involved police attempting to develop relationships of trust with terrorists in custody. Today, a broader range of strategies are employed, from promoting peace among youth and thwarting the allure of extremist narratives, to managing prisoners and assisting former terrorists reintegrate with society. The lead government body since 2010 has been the national counterterrorism agency, Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Terorisme (BNPT), which is tasked with coordinating stakeholders in Indonesia’s struggle with domestic terrorism. But managing the divergent and sometimes competing interests of Indonesia’s large state institutions has not been straightforward, and effective collaboration between relevant state agencies remains an obstacle to the success of CVE initiatives. Where government has fallen short, civil society organisations (CSOs) often fill the gaps, and a number of dedicated practitioners now have invaluable experience, local contacts, and the specific knowledge required for countering extremism in the Indonesian context. CSOs also possess greater levels of trust among the communities they engage than security-centric state agencies could possibly hope to achieve. Yet instead of exploiting these civil society resources, the BNPT has largely preferred an independent (and top-down) approach to CVE initiatives, collaborating if and when assistance is required. The Indonesian government should make better use of the unique legitimacy and expertise of civil society organisations.
topic Indonesia
Countering Violent Exremism
Civil Society
url http://journals.sfu.ca/jd/index.php/jd/article/view/103
work_keys_str_mv AT cameronsumpter counteringviolentextremisminindonesiaprioritiespracticeandtheroleofcivilsociety
_version_ 1725335206174392320