O Caso Nissan: superação da antinomia liderança versus burocracia?

This article presents the results of a study about the Nissan’s succession process, which happened after the transference of shareholding control from the Japanese company to the French Renault and that appointed Brazilian executive Carlos Ghosn as Nissan’s CEO. Having personal characteristics which...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Lins, Milka Alves Correia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing - ESPM 2008-03-01
Series:Internext: Revista Eletrônica de Negócios Internacionais
Subjects:
Online Access:https://internext.espm.br/internext/article/view/66
id doaj-099b1f35ce964d61bc37a3201d19abe6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-099b1f35ce964d61bc37a3201d19abe62020-11-25T03:19:29ZengEscola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing - ESPMInternext: Revista Eletrônica de Negócios Internacionais1980-48652008-03-0131729110.18568/1980-4865.3172-9164O Caso Nissan: superação da antinomia liderança versus burocracia?Daniel Lins0Milka Alves Correia1UFPE/DCA/PROPAD - Recife - PEUFPE/DCA/PROPAD - Recife - PEThis article presents the results of a study about the Nissan’s succession process, which happened after the transference of shareholding control from the Japanese company to the French Renault and that appointed Brazilian executive Carlos Ghosn as Nissan’s CEO. Having personal characteristics which distinguish him as a charismatic leader, the Brazilian executive had the challenger of rescuing Nissan from a nearly bankrupt. For characterization and analysis of the Brazilian executive and Nissan, it was applied the analytical model multidimensional-reflexivo of Alves (2003), which is founded on Max Weber’s typology ofsocial action and ideal types of domination. Comparing Carlos Ghosn´s management with his predecessor, the Japanese Y. Kume, it was possible to conclude, based on the analytical instrument used, that the antinomy between leadership and bureaucracy happens in ideal types theory, however, in practice, these two concepts can be visualized as non–opposed.https://internext.espm.br/internext/article/view/66modelo analíticomultidimensionalidadeanálise organizacionalanalytical modelideal typesmultidimensionalityorganizational analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel Lins
Milka Alves Correia
spellingShingle Daniel Lins
Milka Alves Correia
O Caso Nissan: superação da antinomia liderança versus burocracia?
Internext: Revista Eletrônica de Negócios Internacionais
modelo analítico
multidimensionalidade
análise organizacional
analytical model
ideal types
multidimensionality
organizational analysis
author_facet Daniel Lins
Milka Alves Correia
author_sort Daniel Lins
title O Caso Nissan: superação da antinomia liderança versus burocracia?
title_short O Caso Nissan: superação da antinomia liderança versus burocracia?
title_full O Caso Nissan: superação da antinomia liderança versus burocracia?
title_fullStr O Caso Nissan: superação da antinomia liderança versus burocracia?
title_full_unstemmed O Caso Nissan: superação da antinomia liderança versus burocracia?
title_sort o caso nissan: superação da antinomia liderança versus burocracia?
publisher Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing - ESPM
series Internext: Revista Eletrônica de Negócios Internacionais
issn 1980-4865
publishDate 2008-03-01
description This article presents the results of a study about the Nissan’s succession process, which happened after the transference of shareholding control from the Japanese company to the French Renault and that appointed Brazilian executive Carlos Ghosn as Nissan’s CEO. Having personal characteristics which distinguish him as a charismatic leader, the Brazilian executive had the challenger of rescuing Nissan from a nearly bankrupt. For characterization and analysis of the Brazilian executive and Nissan, it was applied the analytical model multidimensional-reflexivo of Alves (2003), which is founded on Max Weber’s typology ofsocial action and ideal types of domination. Comparing Carlos Ghosn´s management with his predecessor, the Japanese Y. Kume, it was possible to conclude, based on the analytical instrument used, that the antinomy between leadership and bureaucracy happens in ideal types theory, however, in practice, these two concepts can be visualized as non–opposed.
topic modelo analítico
multidimensionalidade
análise organizacional
analytical model
ideal types
multidimensionality
organizational analysis
url https://internext.espm.br/internext/article/view/66
work_keys_str_mv AT daniellins ocasonissansuperacaodaantinomialiderancaversusburocracia
AT milkaalvescorreia ocasonissansuperacaodaantinomialiderancaversusburocracia
_version_ 1724622087701659648