Six Sigma performance of quality indicators in total testing process of point-of-care glucose measurement: A two-year review

Objectives: The error rate in the total testing process (TTP) of point-of-care (POC) glucose measurement remains high although a total quality management system has been applied. Quality indicators (QIs) in the TTP of glucose meter were established via risk assessment. Their two-year Six Sigma value...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne Vincent, Donnah Pocius, Yun Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-05-01
Series:Practical Laboratory Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551721000159
id doaj-099ad3b5c4cb494894f249f9575ea1a9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-099ad3b5c4cb494894f249f9575ea1a92021-05-22T04:37:37ZengElsevierPractical Laboratory Medicine2352-55172021-05-0125e00215Six Sigma performance of quality indicators in total testing process of point-of-care glucose measurement: A two-year reviewAnne Vincent0Donnah Pocius1Yun Huang2Kingston General Hospital, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, CanadaKingston General Hospital, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, CanadaKingston General Hospital, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, Canada; Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen’s University, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, Canada; Corresponding author. Kingston General Hospital, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, Canada, K7L 2V7.Objectives: The error rate in the total testing process (TTP) of point-of-care (POC) glucose measurement remains high although a total quality management system has been applied. Quality indicators (QIs) in the TTP of glucose meter were established via risk assessment. Their two-year Six Sigma values were reviewed for quality improvement. Design: The TTP of POC glucose measurement was mapped to identify risks in key steps. The risks were assessed for their frequency and severity of impact on patient safety. Whenever possible, measurable data from the data management system and other sources was collected to establish QIs for risk monitoring. Average Six Sigma value of each QI in the last two years was calculated for acceptance and for determining corrective action. Results: 29 risks were identified in eight key steps of the TTP. Eight QIs were established for monitoring six risks and three QIs for two accepted risks were established for improving operator testing skill. The QIs had a good coverage to key steps. Two, five and four QIs showed Six Sigma values <3, 3-4 and >4 respectively. Six Sigma values of two QIs related to quality control (QC) testing were improved by using meters with accurate QC sample loading. Conclusions: The establishment of QIs for glucose measurement by risk assessment with measurable data from the data management system and on Six sigma scale was effective, efficient, and manageable. Most of QIs’ Six Sigma values were between 3 and 5, which could be improved by using upgraded meters.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551721000159Point-of-care testingGlucose meterQuality indicatorRisk assessmentSix sigma
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anne Vincent
Donnah Pocius
Yun Huang
spellingShingle Anne Vincent
Donnah Pocius
Yun Huang
Six Sigma performance of quality indicators in total testing process of point-of-care glucose measurement: A two-year review
Practical Laboratory Medicine
Point-of-care testing
Glucose meter
Quality indicator
Risk assessment
Six sigma
author_facet Anne Vincent
Donnah Pocius
Yun Huang
author_sort Anne Vincent
title Six Sigma performance of quality indicators in total testing process of point-of-care glucose measurement: A two-year review
title_short Six Sigma performance of quality indicators in total testing process of point-of-care glucose measurement: A two-year review
title_full Six Sigma performance of quality indicators in total testing process of point-of-care glucose measurement: A two-year review
title_fullStr Six Sigma performance of quality indicators in total testing process of point-of-care glucose measurement: A two-year review
title_full_unstemmed Six Sigma performance of quality indicators in total testing process of point-of-care glucose measurement: A two-year review
title_sort six sigma performance of quality indicators in total testing process of point-of-care glucose measurement: a two-year review
publisher Elsevier
series Practical Laboratory Medicine
issn 2352-5517
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Objectives: The error rate in the total testing process (TTP) of point-of-care (POC) glucose measurement remains high although a total quality management system has been applied. Quality indicators (QIs) in the TTP of glucose meter were established via risk assessment. Their two-year Six Sigma values were reviewed for quality improvement. Design: The TTP of POC glucose measurement was mapped to identify risks in key steps. The risks were assessed for their frequency and severity of impact on patient safety. Whenever possible, measurable data from the data management system and other sources was collected to establish QIs for risk monitoring. Average Six Sigma value of each QI in the last two years was calculated for acceptance and for determining corrective action. Results: 29 risks were identified in eight key steps of the TTP. Eight QIs were established for monitoring six risks and three QIs for two accepted risks were established for improving operator testing skill. The QIs had a good coverage to key steps. Two, five and four QIs showed Six Sigma values <3, 3-4 and >4 respectively. Six Sigma values of two QIs related to quality control (QC) testing were improved by using meters with accurate QC sample loading. Conclusions: The establishment of QIs for glucose measurement by risk assessment with measurable data from the data management system and on Six sigma scale was effective, efficient, and manageable. Most of QIs’ Six Sigma values were between 3 and 5, which could be improved by using upgraded meters.
topic Point-of-care testing
Glucose meter
Quality indicator
Risk assessment
Six sigma
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551721000159
work_keys_str_mv AT annevincent sixsigmaperformanceofqualityindicatorsintotaltestingprocessofpointofcareglucosemeasurementatwoyearreview
AT donnahpocius sixsigmaperformanceofqualityindicatorsintotaltestingprocessofpointofcareglucosemeasurementatwoyearreview
AT yunhuang sixsigmaperformanceofqualityindicatorsintotaltestingprocessofpointofcareglucosemeasurementatwoyearreview
_version_ 1721430716671066112