Comparison of sedative effects of oral midazolam/chloral hydrate and midazolam/promethazine in pediatric dentistry

Background. The aim of this investigation was to compare the sedative effects of oral midazolam/chloral hydrate and midazolam/promethazine combinations on fearful children needing dental treatment. Methods. This crossover double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 30 children aged 2‒6 years, who h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Majid Mehran, Ghassem Ansari, Mojtaba Vahid Golpayegani, Shahnaz Shayeghi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2018-09-01
Series:Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects
Subjects:
Online Access:http://joddd.tbzmed.ac.ir/PDF/joddd-12-221.pdf
id doaj-098c95744030471ab8a0a266185798e8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-098c95744030471ab8a0a266185798e82020-11-24T22:03:21ZengTabriz University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects2008-210X2008-21182018-09-0112322122610.15171/joddd.2018.034joddd-21073Comparison of sedative effects of oral midazolam/chloral hydrate and midazolam/promethazine in pediatric dentistryMajid MehranGhassem AnsariMojtaba Vahid GolpayeganiShahnaz ShayeghiBackground. The aim of this investigation was to compare the sedative effects of oral midazolam/chloral hydrate and midazolam/promethazine combinations on fearful children needing dental treatment. Methods. This crossover double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 30 children aged 2‒6 years, who had at least two similar teeth needing pulp treatment. Standard vital signs were recorded before and after premedication. Wilson sedation scale was used to judge the level of sedation. Cases were divided into two groups based on the sequence of medication received. This was to overcome the sequence effect. Group I received oral midazolam (0.4 mg/kg/chloral hydrate (50 mg/kg) at the first visit while they received midazolam (0.4 mg/kg)/promethazine (5 mg/kg) in their second visit. Group II received the premedication in the opposite sequence. The operator and child were blinded to the medication administered. Sedative efficacy of the two combinations were assessed and judged by two independent pediatric dentists based on the Wilson scale. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and paired t-test. Results. Only 10% of children who received chloral hydrate with midazolam exhibited high improvement in their behavior while 53% showed reasonable positive changes and 12% had no change or even deterioration of behavior. The difference between the effect of the two combination drugs was statistically significant (P<0.05) in favor of the chloral hydrate group. Conclusion. The results showed a significant difference in the sedation level induced between the two groups. Midazolam/chloral hydrate combination more effectively improved the co-operation for dental treatment.http://joddd.tbzmed.ac.ir/PDF/joddd-12-221.pdfChildchloral hydratedental sedationmidazolampromethazine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Majid Mehran
Ghassem Ansari
Mojtaba Vahid Golpayegani
Shahnaz Shayeghi
spellingShingle Majid Mehran
Ghassem Ansari
Mojtaba Vahid Golpayegani
Shahnaz Shayeghi
Comparison of sedative effects of oral midazolam/chloral hydrate and midazolam/promethazine in pediatric dentistry
Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects
Child
chloral hydrate
dental sedation
midazolam
promethazine
author_facet Majid Mehran
Ghassem Ansari
Mojtaba Vahid Golpayegani
Shahnaz Shayeghi
author_sort Majid Mehran
title Comparison of sedative effects of oral midazolam/chloral hydrate and midazolam/promethazine in pediatric dentistry
title_short Comparison of sedative effects of oral midazolam/chloral hydrate and midazolam/promethazine in pediatric dentistry
title_full Comparison of sedative effects of oral midazolam/chloral hydrate and midazolam/promethazine in pediatric dentistry
title_fullStr Comparison of sedative effects of oral midazolam/chloral hydrate and midazolam/promethazine in pediatric dentistry
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of sedative effects of oral midazolam/chloral hydrate and midazolam/promethazine in pediatric dentistry
title_sort comparison of sedative effects of oral midazolam/chloral hydrate and midazolam/promethazine in pediatric dentistry
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
series Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects
issn 2008-210X
2008-2118
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Background. The aim of this investigation was to compare the sedative effects of oral midazolam/chloral hydrate and midazolam/promethazine combinations on fearful children needing dental treatment. Methods. This crossover double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 30 children aged 2‒6 years, who had at least two similar teeth needing pulp treatment. Standard vital signs were recorded before and after premedication. Wilson sedation scale was used to judge the level of sedation. Cases were divided into two groups based on the sequence of medication received. This was to overcome the sequence effect. Group I received oral midazolam (0.4 mg/kg/chloral hydrate (50 mg/kg) at the first visit while they received midazolam (0.4 mg/kg)/promethazine (5 mg/kg) in their second visit. Group II received the premedication in the opposite sequence. The operator and child were blinded to the medication administered. Sedative efficacy of the two combinations were assessed and judged by two independent pediatric dentists based on the Wilson scale. Data were analyzed with ANOVA and paired t-test. Results. Only 10% of children who received chloral hydrate with midazolam exhibited high improvement in their behavior while 53% showed reasonable positive changes and 12% had no change or even deterioration of behavior. The difference between the effect of the two combination drugs was statistically significant (P<0.05) in favor of the chloral hydrate group. Conclusion. The results showed a significant difference in the sedation level induced between the two groups. Midazolam/chloral hydrate combination more effectively improved the co-operation for dental treatment.
topic Child
chloral hydrate
dental sedation
midazolam
promethazine
url http://joddd.tbzmed.ac.ir/PDF/joddd-12-221.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT majidmehran comparisonofsedativeeffectsoforalmidazolamchloralhydrateandmidazolampromethazineinpediatricdentistry
AT ghassemansari comparisonofsedativeeffectsoforalmidazolamchloralhydrateandmidazolampromethazineinpediatricdentistry
AT mojtabavahidgolpayegani comparisonofsedativeeffectsoforalmidazolamchloralhydrateandmidazolampromethazineinpediatricdentistry
AT shahnazshayeghi comparisonofsedativeeffectsoforalmidazolamchloralhydrateandmidazolampromethazineinpediatricdentistry
_version_ 1725831843856515072